Development and evaluation of a training program for pediatric residents on physical activity interventions

Physical activity (PA) provides numerous health benefits; however, PA levels decline as children age. Primary care-based physical activity interventions (PAI) are moderately effective in increasing youth PA levels. Medical organizations recommend that physicians provide PAI; however, physician PAI rates are low. There are several barriers to PAI, including physicians' lack of PAI knowledge and skills. PAI medical education is severely limited. Therefore, there is a need to develop and evaluate medical education PAI curricula. The primary purpose of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a PAI curriculum for pediatric residents; focusing on pre to posttest changes in residents' PAI knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KAB). The secondary purpose was to determine residents' perceptions of the instructional strategies. An embedded mixed methods design was used, with qualitative data embedded in quantitative data. Participants (n = 13) were administered the KAB Assessment before and after the program and a Participant Feedback form after the program. Additionally, instructor field notes and focus group responses were collected. A paired t test showed a significant pretest to posttest increase in PAI knowledge scores. A MANOVA indicated a significant increase in positive PAI attitudes. Follow-up univariate analyses showed significant effects and near significant effects for the attitudes constructs of perceived knowledge and feasibility, respectively. Paired t tests showed a significant increase only for the PAI behavior of PA prescription. However, participants reported higher rates of PAI behaviors than in previous literature. Most useful, least useful, and alternative instructional strategies were considered; along with limitations, strengths, and future directions for this PAI curriculum study

On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine.

Following our call to join in the discussion over the suitability of implementing a reporting checklist for bio-nano papers, the community responds

Publisher Correction: On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper