Quantitative PCR Is Faster, More Objective, and More Reliable Than Immunohistochemistry for the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Gastrointestinal Disease in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease relies on the presence of GI symptoms and detection of CMV, mainly by immunohistochemistry (IHC), in GI biopsy specimens. Thus, in a symptomatic patient, a positive CMV-IHC result is accepted as a diagnosis of CMV disease. However, a positive CMV-PCR in GI tissue is considered "possible" CMV disease. Therefore, it would be very useful if, in practice, both techniques showed equal sensitivity and reliability. This is because PCR has many practical advantages over IHC for detecting CMV. The aim of this study was to compare quantitative PCR with IHC for the diagnosis of GI CMV disease. A total of 186 endoscopic GI biopsy specimens from 123 patients with GI symptoms after an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT; 2004-2017) were analyzed by IHC and PCR on 113 paraffin-embedded and 73 fresh samples. The results were then compared. Of the patients with macroscopic lesions in the mucosa and CMV-IHC-positive biopsy specimens (eg, "proven" CMV disease, n = 28), all but 1 were CMV-PCR positive. Of the patients without macroscopic lesions in the mucosa and CMV-IHC-positive biopsy specimens (eg, probable CMV disease, n = 4), only 1 was CMV-PCR positive. Eight patients had CMV-IHC-negative/CMV-PCR-positive gut biopsy specimens. These cases fall within the current definition of possible CMV disease. In 6 of these 8 cases (75%), the viral load in GI tissue was very high (>10,000 copies/µg). Taken together, the results from the proven and probable cases revealed that CMV-PCR shows the same sensitivity (100%), specificity (98%), and positive (93%) and negative predictive value (100%) as CMV-IHC. Detection of CMV in fresh GI mucosa by quantitative PCR is as useful as IHC for the diagnosis of GI CMV disease. The results show that quantitative PCR has the same sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive value as IHC

Quantitative PCR Is Faster, More Objective, and More Reliable Than Immunohistochemistry for the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Gastrointestinal Disease in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease relies on the presence of GI symptoms and detection of CMV, mainly by immunohistochemistry (IHC), in GI biopsy specimens. Thus, in a symptomatic patient, a positive CMV-IHC result is accepted as a diagnosis of CMV disease. However, a positive CMV-PCR in GI tissue is considered "possible" CMV disease. Therefore, it would be very useful if, in practice, both techniques showed equal sensitivity and reliability. This is because PCR has many practical advantages over IHC for detecting CMV. The aim of this study was to compare quantitative PCR with IHC for the diagnosis of GI CMV disease. A total of 186 endoscopic GI biopsy specimens from 123 patients with GI symptoms after an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT; 2004-2017) were analyzed by IHC and PCR on 113 paraffin-embedded and 73 fresh samples. The results were then compared. Of the patients with macroscopic lesions in the mucosa and CMV-IHC-positive biopsy specimens (eg, "proven" CMV disease, n = 28), all but 1 were CMV-PCR positive. Of the patients without macroscopic lesions in the mucosa and CMV-IHC-positive biopsy specimens (eg, probable CMV disease, n = 4), only 1 was CMV-PCR positive. Eight patients had CMV-IHC-negative/CMV-PCR-positive gut biopsy specimens. These cases fall within the current definition of possible CMV disease. In 6 of these 8 cases (75%), the viral load in GI tissue was very high (>10,000 copies/µg). Taken together, the results from the proven and probable cases revealed that CMV-PCR shows the same sensitivity (100%), specificity (98%), and positive (93%) and negative predictive value (100%) as CMV-IHC. Detection of CMV in fresh GI mucosa by quantitative PCR is as useful as IHC for the diagnosis of GI CMV disease. The results show that quantitative PCR has the same sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive value as IHC

Genotyping-By-Sequencing diversity analysis of international Vanilla collections uncovers hidden diversity and enables plant improvement

Genomics-based diversity analysis of natural vanilla populations is important in order to guide conservation efforts and genetic improvement through plant breeding. Vanilla is a cultivated, undomesticated spice that originated in Mesoamerica prior to spreading globally through vegetative cuttings. Vanilla extract from the commercial species, mainly V. planifolia and V. × tahitensis, is used around the world as an ingredient in foods, beverages, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. The global reliance on descendants of a few foundational clones in commercial production has resulted in an industry at heightened risk of catastrophic failure due to extremely narrow genetic diversity. Conversely, national and institutional collections including those near the center of cultivation contain previously undiscovered diversity that could bolster the genetic improvement of vanilla and guide conservation efforts. Towards this goal, an international vanilla genotyping effort generated and analyzed 431,204 single nucleotide polymorphisms among 412 accessions and 27 species from eight collections. Phylo- genetic and STRUCTURE analysis sorted vanilla by species and identified hybrid accessions. Principal Compo- nent Analysis and the Fixation Index (FST) were used to refine relationships among accessions and showed differentiation among species. Analysis of the commercial species split V. planifolia into three types with all V. × tahitensis accessions being most similar to V. planifolia type 2. Finally, an in-depth analysis of V. × tahitensis identified seven V. planifolia and six V. odorata accessions as most similar to the estimated parental genotypes providing additional data in support of the current hybrid theory. The prevalence of probable V. × tahitensis parental accessions from Belize suggests that V. × tahitensis could have originated from this area and highlights the need for vanilla conservation throughout Central and South America. The genetic groupings among accessions, particularly for V. planifolia, can now be used to focus breeding efforts on fewer accessions that capture the greatest diversity.UCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Agroalimentarias::Jardín Botánico Lankester (JBL

Xylophagous Beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae and Cerambycidae) from Ficus carica

López-Martínez, Víctor, Vargas, Orthon Ricardo, Alia-Tejacal, Iran, Toledo-Hernández, Víctor H., Corona-López, Angélica M., Delfín-González, Hugo, Guillen-Sánchez, Dagoberto, Jiménez-García, Daniel (2015): Xylophagous Beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae and Cerambycidae) from Ficus caricaL. (Moraceae) in Morelos, Mexico. The Coleopterists Bulletin 69 (4): 780-788, DOI: 10.1649/0010-065x-69.4.780, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/0010-065x-69.4.78