12 research outputs found

    Factors associated with testicular self-examination among unaffected men from multiple-case testicular cancer families

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The lifetime testicular cancer (TC) risk in the general population is relatively low (~1 in 250), but men with a family history of TC are at 4 to 9 times greater risk than those without. Some health and professional organizations recommend consideration of testicular self-examination (TSE) for certain high-risk groups (e.g. men with a family history of TC). Yet little is known about factors associated with TSE behaviors in this at-risk group.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We collected information on this subject during an on-going NCI multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC) study. We present the first report specifically targeting TSE behaviors among first- and second-degree relatives (n = 99) of affected men from families with ≥ 2 TC cases. Demographic, medical, knowledge, health belief, and psychological factors consistent with the Health Belief Model (HBM) were evaluated as variables related to TSE behavior, using chi-square tests of association for categorical variables, and t-tests for continuous variables.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For men in our sample, 46% (n = 46) reported performing TSE regularly and 51% (n = 50) reported not regularly performing TSE. Factors associated (p < .05) with regularly performing TSE in multivariate analysis were physician recommendation and testicular cancer worry. This is the first study to examine TSE in unaffected men from FTC families.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The findings suggest that, even in this high-risk setting, TSE practices are sub-optimal. Our data provide a basis for further exploring psychosocial issues that are specific to men with a family history of TC, and formulating intervention strategies aimed at improving adherence to TSE guidelines.</p

    Guidelines, Practice Policies, and Parameters: The Case for Geriatrics.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: As the population ages, the care of older persons becomes more important. At the same time, practice guidelines that provide recommendations for appropriate care are being published in greater numbers. The purpose of this work is to determine the proportion of guidelines that contain specific information about older persons. DESIGN: Through a random sample of published guidelines listed in the AMA Directory of Practice Parameters, 1992 Edition, we determined the proportion of guidelines that contain specific age-related information. We also determined if, over time, there was a difference in the proportion of practice guidelines containing information about older persons. RESULTS: 45.9% (95% CI, range 33.4-58.4) of guidelines that could conceivably pertain to older persons contain no age information; 24.6% (95% CI, range 13.8-35.4) of guidelines contain information only about persons less than 65 years of age; 29.5% (95% CI, range 18.1-41.0) of guidelines contain specific information about older persons. Moreover, there were no secular trends in the proportion of guidelines pertaining to older persons. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of practice guidelines contain information about older persons. Possible causes and solutions to this shortfall are discussed
    corecore