Gene-Xpert Ultra for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children and adolescents

This prospective study describes the use of Gene-Xpert Ultra for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in children and adolescents, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Eighteen patients were studied; the final diagnosis of EPTB was established in 13 (72%). Gene-Xpert Ultra results showed detection in 10/13 (77%) of EPTB cases (7 of these 10 with trace-positive results). Gene-Xpert Ultra proved to be a promising method for the diagnosis of childhood EPTB

a multicenter study

(1) Background: The Commercial Kit SIRE Nitratase® PlastLabor, is a drug susceptibility test kit used to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to first-line TB treatment drugs. The present study aimed at evaluating its performance in a multicenter study. (2) Methods: To determine its accuracy, the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or the BACTECTMMGITTM960 system was used as a gold standard. (3) Results: The study revealed that the respective accuracies of the kit with 190 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, using the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or BACTECTMMGITTM960 system as a gold standard, were 93.9% and 94.6%, 96.9% and 94.6%, 98.0% and 97.8%, and 98.0% and 98.9%, for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol, respectively. (4) Conclusion: Thus, the kit can rapidly screen resistance to streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol. Additionally, it does not require sophisticated equipment; hence, it can be easily used in the laboratories of low and middle income countries.publishersversionpublishe

Convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in hospitalised patients : an open-label, randomised clinical trial

Background: The effects of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy in hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. This study investigates the effect of CP on clinical improvement in these patients. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, randomised, parallel arm, open-label, superiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to two infusions of CP plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement 28 days after enrolment. Results: A total of 160 (80 in each arm) patients (66.3% critically ill, 33.7% severely ill) completed the trial. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 60.5 (48–68) years; 58.1% were male and the median (IQR) time from symptom onset to randomisation was 10 (8–12) days. Neutralising antibody titres >1:80 were present in 133 (83.1%) patients at baseline. The proportion of patients with clinical improvement on day 28 was 61.3% in the CP+SOC group and 65.0% in the SOC group (difference −3.7%, 95% CI −18.8–11.3%). The results were similar in the severe and critically ill subgroups. There was no significant difference between CP+SOC and SOC groups in pre-specified secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, days alive and free of respiratory support and duration of invasive ventilatory support. Inflammatory and other laboratory marker values on days 3, 7 and 14 were similar between groups. Conclusions: CP+SOC did not result in a higher proportion of clinical improvement on day 28 in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 compared to SOC alone

Detection of drug resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis strains using kit SIRE Nitratase®: a multicenter study

This research was funded by MINAS GERAIS STATE RESEARCH SUPPORT FOUNDATION (FAPEMIG), grants numbers 65/10 and CDS-APQ-03266-13, and by NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT (CNPQ) grants numbers 310174/2014-7 and 446796/2014-0.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Medicine. Mycobacteria Research Laboratory. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Faculty of Pharmacy. Department of Social Pharmacy. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Minas Gerais. Veterinary School. Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.Federal University of Rio Grande. Faculty of Medicine. Laboratory of Mycobacteria. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.Federal University of Rio Grande. Faculty of Medicine. Laboratory of Mycobacteria. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.Federal University of Rio Grande. Faculty of Medicine. Laboratory of Mycobacteria. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Instituto Evandro Chagas. Ananindeua, PA, Brasil.Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado. Manaus, AM, Brazil.Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado. Manaus, AM, Brazil.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Institute of Chest Diseases. Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Institute of Chest Diseases. Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Federal University of Grande Dourados. Faculty of Health Sciences. Dourados, MS, Brazil / Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, MS, Brazil.Adolfo Lutz Institute. Bacteriology Center. Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Center. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Adolfo Lutz Institute. Bacteriology Center. Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Center. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Adolfo Lutz Institute. Bacteriology Center. Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Center. São Paulo, SP, Brazil.State Secretariat of Health of Rio Grande do Sul. State Center for Health Surveillance. Center for Scientific and Technological Development. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.State Secretariat of Health of Rio Grande do Sul. State Center for Health Surveillance. Center for Scientific and Technological Development. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. National Institute of Infectology Evandro Chagas. Laboratory of Bacteriology and Bioassays of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Sergio Arouca National Public Health School. Professor Hélio Fraga Reference Center. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Sergio Arouca National Public Health School. Professor Hélio Fraga Reference Center. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Nova University of Lisbon. Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Medical Microbiology Unit, Global Health and Tropical Medicine. Lisboa, Portugal.Nova University of Lisbon. Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Medical Microbiology Unit, Global Health and Tropical Medicine. Lisboa, Portugal.Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Faculty of Medicine. Tuberculosis Research Center. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.Background: The Commercial Kit SIRE Nitratase® PlastLabor, is a drug susceptibility test kit used to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to first-line TB treatment drugs. The present study aimed at evaluating its performance in a multicenter study. (2) Methods: To determine its accuracy, the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or the BACTECTMMGITTM960 system was used as a gold standard. (3) Results: The study revealed that the respective accuracies of the kit with 190 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, using the proportion methods in Lowenstein Jensen medium or BACTECTMMGITTM960 system as a gold standard, were 93.9% and 94.6%, 96.9% and 94.6%, 98.0% and 97.8%, and 98.0% and 98.9%, for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol, respectively. (4) Conclusion: Thus, the kit can rapidly screen resistance to streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol. Additionally, it does not require sophisticated equipment; hence, it can be easily used in the laboratories of low and middle income countries

Duration of post-vaccination immunity against yellow fever in adults

Submitted by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-06-22T17:37:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-06-22T17:37:52Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-06-22T17:58:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-22T17:58:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Brasilia, DF, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicosde Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Imunopatologia .Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Esquistossomose. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFood and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Bethesda, USA.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Fla-vivirus. Rio de JaneiroFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Fla-vivirus. Rio de JaneiroFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Fla-vivirus. Rio de JaneiroInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilUniversidade Federal de Alfenas. Alfenas, MG, BrasilUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Medicina. Brasilia, DF, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Evandro Chagas. Ananindeua, PA, BrasilINTRODUCTION: Available scientific evidence to recommend or to advise against booster doses of yellow fever vaccine (YFV) is inconclusive. A study to estimate the seropositivity rate and geometric mean titres (GMT) of adults with varied times of vaccination was aimed to provide elements to revise the need and the timing of revaccination. METHODS: Adults from the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Alfenas located in non-endemic areas in the Southeast of Brazil, who had one dose of YFV, were tested for YF neutralising antibodies and dengue IgG. Time (in years) since vaccination was based on immunisation cards and other reliable records. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2012 we recruited 691 subjects (73% males), aged 18-83 years. Time since vaccination ranged from 30 days to 18 years. Seropositivity rates (95%C.I.) and GMT (International Units/mL; 95%C.I.) decreased with time since vaccination: 93% (88-96%), 8.8 (7.0-10.9) IU/mL for newly vaccinated; 94% (88-97), 3.0 (2.5-3.6) IU/mL after 1-4 years; 83% (74-90), 2.2 (1.7-2.8) IU/mL after 5-9 years; 76% (68-83), 1.7 (1.4-2.0) IU/mL after 10-11 years; and 85% (80-90), 2.1 (1.7-2.5) IU/mL after 12 years or more. YF seropositivity rates were not affected by previous dengue infection. CONCLUSIONS:Eventhough serological correlates of protection for yellow fever are unknown, seronegativity in vaccinated subjects may indicate primary immunisation failure, or waning of immunity to levels below the protection threshold. Immunogenicity of YFV under routine conditions of immunisation services is likely to be lower than in controlled studies. Moreover, infants and toddlers, who comprise the main target group in YF endemic regions, and populations with high HIV infection rates, respond to YFV with lower antibody levels. In those settings one booster dose, preferably sooner than currently recommended, seems to be necessary to ensure longer protection for all vaccinee