117 research outputs found

    The value of liability tests in abuses of dominance

    Get PDF
    Currently, there is a debate in the European Union regarding the European Commission’s approach in assessing the behaviour of dominant firms. It is argued that as digital ecosystems become more powerful, there is increasing pressure on the Commission to act against their practices, regardless of whether they meet the test established by the European Courts to find out liability. This article aims to demonstrate that the Commission’s approach, which occasionally deviates from liability tests, is legitimate, because it aligns with the effects-based notion of abuse and the teleological interpretation of treaty rules. Moreover, this article maintains that if such liability tests were unalterable, their individual components would be elevated to essential elements of the concept of abuse, which directly contradicts the current interpretation of this notion. Finally, the article asserts that the liability tests used thus far represent a collection of factual circumstances that hold substantial evidential value in demonstrating the effects of dominant firms’ practices. It however acknowledges that, while this evidential value has remained high over time, it may still vary depending on the circumstances. This is why the particular circumstances that make up the elements of these tests can be substituted with alternative circumstances, depending on the specific scenario being analysed

    The intersection between intellectual property and antitrust law

    Get PDF
    The chapter analyzes how intellectual property and competition interact

    Policy Recommendation on the Competition Law Issues of the Re-use of Public Sector Information (PSI)

    Get PDF
    Based on a description of the structure and competitive relationships that characterize PSI markets, and in the light of some case studies and legal decisions from sev - eral EU Member States, this document addresses what legal rules a new Directive, amending Directive 2003/98/CE on the re-use of Public Sector Information, could introduce in order to both discourage anticompetitive business practices and make them easier to be detected and proved

    Standardized Terms and Conditions For Open Patenting

    Get PDF
    After providing a legal characterization of the open patenting phenomenon and discussing many of the empirical and theoretical experiences that relate to both Open Innovation and defensive patenting, this paper suggests standardized terms and conditions that a patent license should contain in order to foster both the free movement of patented knowledge and its business applications

    Open Data and Competition Law Some Issues Regarding Access and Pricing of Raw Data

    Get PDF
    Public sector information (PSI) is a very valuable resource that, back in 2003, the EU parliament and council decided to appraise by incentivizing its re-use via a dedicated Directive. In 2013, the directive was revised to further promote the development of a single European market for information goods and services. On the bases of the European and national case law, this article investigates the main competitive issues that this EU law about PSI triggers

    La nozione antitrust di impresa ai tempi della sharing economy e la tutela dei lavoratori: per l’arretramento del diritto antitrust

    No full text
    Gli accordi collettivi tra service providers e piattaforme possono escludersi dall’ambito di applicazione del diritto antitrust in nome delle ragioni socio-politiche che negli anni ‘90 già indussero la Corte di Giustizia a sottrarre allo scrutinio antitrust gli accordi collettivi tra le parti sociali. Non occorre transitare per la nozione di impresa

    L’intelligenza artificiale e l’accesso ai dati: un ruolo per il codice del consumo e per il diritto dell’antitrust

    No full text
    Sommario: 1. La quarta rivoluzione digitale tra datificazione, conoscenza e intelligenza artificiale. — 2. Quando la raccolta di dati digitali lede le norme a tutela dei consumatori. — 3. Quando una attività di raccolta di dati condotta in maniera scorretta rappresenta anche un illecito concorrenziale. — 4. Quando la raccolta di dati lede il meccanismo competitivo impedendo ai rivali di accedere a una risorsa che non ammette sostituti. — 4.1. La sostituibilità dei dati. — 5. L’analisi “acritica” dei dati e l’effettiva possibilità di sviluppare forme sempre nuove di intelligenza artificiale: il problema dell’ubiquità di mercato. — 6. Considerazioni (temporaneamente) conclusive
    corecore