3,690 research outputs found

    The islandā€“mainland species turnover relationship

    Get PDF
    Many oceanic islands are notable for their high endemism, suggesting that islands may promote unique assembly processes. However, mainland assemblages sometimes harbour comparable levels of endemism, suggesting that island biotas may not be as unique as is often assumed. Here, we test the uniqueness of island biotic assembly by comparing the rate of species turnover among islands and the mainland, after accounting for distance decay and environmental gradients. We modelled species turnover as a function of geographical and environmental distance for mainland (Mā€“M) communities of Anolis lizards and Terrarana frogs, two clades that have diversified extensively on Caribbean islands and the mainland Neotropics. We compared mainlandā€“island (Mā€“I) and islandā€“island (Iā€“I) species turnover with predictions of the Mā€“M model. If island assembly is not unique, then the Mā€“M model should successfully predict Mā€“I and Iā€“I turnover, given geographical and environmental distance. We found that Mā€“I turnover and, to a lesser extent, Iā€“I turnover were significantly higher than predicted for both clades. Thus, in the first quantitative comparison of mainlandā€“island species turnover, we confirm the long-held but untested assumption that island assemblages accumulate biodiversity differently than their mainland counterparts

    Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study.

    Get PDF
    Objective: To investigate the prevalence of persistent and long term postpartum urinary incontinence and associations with mode of first and subsequent delivery. Setting: Maternity units in Aberdeen (Scotland), Birmingham (England) and Dunedin (New Zealand). Design: Longitudinal study Population: 4214 women who returned postal questionnaires 3 months and 6 years after the index birth. Methods: Symptom data were obtained from both questionnaires and obstetric data from case-notes for the index birth and the second questionnaire for subsequent births. Logistic regression investigated the independent effects of mode of first delivery and delivery mode history. Main outcome measures: Urinary incontinence ā€“ persistent (at 3 months and 6 years after index birth) and long-term (at 6 years after index birth). Results: The prevalence of persistent urinary incontinence was 24%. Delivering exclusively by Caesarean section was associated with both less persistent (OR= 0.46, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.68) and long term urinary incontinence (OR=0.50, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.63). Caesarean section birth in addition to vaginal delivery however was not associated with significantly less persistent incontinence (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.67 to 1.29). There were no significant associations between persistent or long-term urinary incontinence and forceps or vacuum extraction delivery. Other significantly associated factors were increasing number of births and older maternal age. Conclusions: The risk of persistent and long term urinary incontinence is significantly lower following Caesarean section deliveries but not if there is another vaginal birth. Even when delivering exclusively by Caesarean section, the prevalence of persistent symptoms (14%) is still high

    Twelve-year follow-up of conservative management of postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence and prolapse outcomes : randomised controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Ā© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Funded by Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK; Health Research Council of New Zealand. Grant Number: RG 819/06 New Zealand Lottery Grant Board Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health DirectoratesPeer reviewedPostprin

    Faecal incontinence persisting after childbirth : a 12 year longitudinal study

    Get PDF
    Ā© 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Ā© 2012 RCOG.Peer reviewedPostprin

    Decentralized Coordination in RoboCup Rescue

    Full text link

    The relative importance of local and regional processes to metapopulation dynamics

    Get PDF
    Metapopulation dynamics - patch occupancy, colonization and extinction - are the result of complex processes at both local (e.g. environmental conditions) and regional (e.g. spatial arrangement of habitat patches) scales. A large body of work has focused on habitat patch area and connectivity (area-isolation paradigm). However, these approaches often do not incorporate local environmental conditions or fully address how the spatial arrangement of habitat patches (and resulting connectivity) can influence metapopulation dynamics. Here, we utilize long-term data on a classic metapopulation system - the Glanville fritillary butterfly occupying a set of dry meadows and pastures in the angstrom land islands - to investigate the relative roles of local environmental conditions, geographic space and connectivity in capturing patch occupancy, colonization and extinction. We defined connectivity using traditional measures as well as graph-theoretic measures of centrality. Using boosted regression tree models, we find roughly comparable model performance among models trained on environmental conditions, geographic space or patch centrality. In models containing all of the covariates, we find strong and consistent evidence for the roles of resource abundance, longitude and centrality (i.e. connectivity) in predicting habitat patch occupancy and colonization, while patch centrality (connectivity) was relatively unimportant for predicting extinction. Relative variable importance did not change when geographic coordinates were not considered and models underwent spatially stratified cross-validation. Together, this suggests that the combination of regional-scale connectivity measures and local-scale environmental conditions is important for predicting metapopulation dynamics and that a stronger integration of ideas from network theory may provide insight into metapopulation processes.Peer reviewe
    • ā€¦
    corecore