The relationship between ethnicity and multiple sclerosis characteristics in the United Kingdom: A UK MS Register study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) severity according to ethnicity. METHODS: Data were obtained from the UK MS Register, a prospective longitudinal cohort study of persons with MS. We examined the association between self-reported ethnic background and age at onset, symptom of onset and a variety of participant-reported severity measures. We used adjusted multivariable linear regression models to explore the association between ethnicity and impact of MS, and Cox proportional hazards models to assess disability progression. RESULTS: We analysed data from 17,314 people with MS, including participants from self-reported Black (n = 157) or South Asian (n = 230) ethnic backgrounds. Age at MS onset and diagnosis was lower in those of South Asian (median 30.0) and Black (median 33.0) ethnicity compared with White ethnicity (median 35.0). In participants with online MS severity measures available, we found no statistically significant evidence for an association between ethnic background and physical disability in MS in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. CONCLUSION: We found no association between ethnic background and MS severity in a large, diverse UK cohort. These findings suggest that other factors, such as socioeconomic status and structural inequalities, may explain previous findings

The impact of smoking cessation on multiple sclerosis disease progression

The negative impact of smoking in MS is well established, however, there is much less evidence as to whether smoking cessation is beneficial to progression in MS. Adults with MS registered on the United Kingdom MS Register (2011-2020) formed this retrospective and prospective cohort study. Primary outcomes were changes in 3 patient reported outcomes (PROs): normalised MS Physical Impact Scale (MSIS-29-Phys), normalised MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression). Time to event outcomes were clinically significant increases in the PROs. 7983 participants were included, 4130 (51.7%) of these had ever smoked; of whom 1315 (16.5%) were current smokers and 2815/4130 (68.2%) were former smokers. For all PROs, current smokers at the time of completing their first questionnaire had higher PRO scores indicating higher disability compared to those who had never smoked (∼10 points difference in MSIS-29-Phys and MSWS-12; 1.5-1.8 point for HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression). There was no improvement in PRO scores with increasing time since quitting in former smokers. 923 participants formed the prospective parallel group, which demonstrated that MSIS-29-phy 5.03, [3.71, 6.34], MSWS-12 5.28, [3.62, 6.94] and HADS-depression 0.71, [0.47, 0.96] worsened over a period of 4 years, whereas HADS-anxiety remained stable. Smoking status was significant at year 4; current smokers had higher MSIS-29-Phys and HADS-Anxiety scores (3.05 [0.22, 5.88], 1.14 [0.52,1.76]) while former smokers had a lower MSIS-29 score of -2.91[-5.03, -0.79]. 4642 participants comprised the time to event analysis. Still smoking was associated with a shorter time to worsening event in all PROs (MSIS-29-Phys: n = 4436, p = 0.0013; MSWS-12: n = 3902, p = 0.0061; HADS-anxiety: n = 4511, p = 0.0017; HADS-depression: n = 4511, p < 0.0001). Worsening in motor disability (MSIS-29-Phys and MSWS-12) was independent of baseline HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression scores. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of worsening between never and former smokers. When smokers quit, there is a slowing in the rate of motor disability deterioration so that it matches the rate of motor decline in those who have never smoked. This suggests that smoking cessation is beneficial for people with MS

Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis:a prospective registry cohort study

Registries have the potential to tackle some of the current limitations in determining the long-term impact of multiple sclerosis. Online assessments using patient-reported outcomes can streamline follow-up enabling large-scale, long-term, cost-effective, home-based, and patient-focused data collection. However, registry data are sparsely sampled and the sensitivity of patient-reported outcomes relative to clinician-reported scales is unknown, making it hard to fully leverage their unique scope and scale to derive insights. This retrospective and prospective cohort study over 11 years involved 15 976 patients with multiple sclerosis from the United Kingdom Multiples Sclerosis Register. Primary outcomes were changes in two patient-reported outcomes: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor component, and Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale. First, we investigated their validity in measuring the impact of physical disability in multiple sclerosis, by looking at their sensitivity to disease subtype and duration. We grouped the available records (91 351 for Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor and 68 092 for Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale) by these two factors, and statistically compared the resulting groups using a novel approach based on Monte Carlo permutation analysis that was designed to cope with the intrinsic sparsity of registry data. Next, we used the patient-reported outcomes to draw novel insights into the developmental time course of subtypes; in particular, the period preceding the transition from relapsing to progressive forms. We report a robust main effect of disease subtype on the patient-reported outcomes and interactions of disease subtype with duration (all P < 0.0001). Specifically, patient-reported outcomes worsen with disease duration for all subtypes (all P < 0.0001) apart from benign multiple sclerosis (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor: P = 0.796; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale: P = 0.983). Furthermore, the patient-reported outcomes of each subtype are statistically different from those of the other subtypes at all time bins (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor: all P < 0.05; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale: all P < 0.01) except when comparing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with benign multiple sclerosis and primary progressive multiple sclerosis with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Notably, there were statistically significant differences between relapsing-remitting and progressive subtypes at disease onset. Critically, the patient-reported outcomes are sensitive to future transitions to progressive subtypes, with individuals who transition presenting with higher patient-reported outcomes in their relapsing-remitting phase compared to individuals who don’t transition since onset (all P < 0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes capture different patterns of physical worsening over disease length and across subtypes; therefore, they are a valid tool to measure the physical impact of multiple sclerosis over the long-term and cost-effectively. Furthermore, more advanced physical disability manifests years before clinical detection of progressive subtypes, adding evidence to the presence of a multiple sclerosis prodrome

Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a prospective registry cohort study

Registries have the potential to tackle some of the current limitations in determining the long-term impact of multiple sclerosis. Online assessments using patient-reported outcomes can streamline follow-up enabling large-scale, long-term, cost-effective, home-based, and patient-focused data collection. However, registry data are sparsely sampled and the sensitivity of patient-reported outcomes relative to clinician-reported scales is unknown, making it hard to fully leverage their unique scope and scale to derive insights. This retrospective and prospective cohort study over 11 years involved 15 976 patients with multiple sclerosis from the United Kingdom Multiples Sclerosis Register. Primary outcomes were changes in two patient-reported outcomes: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor component, and Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale. First, we investigated their validity in measuring the impact of physical disability in multiple sclerosis, by looking at their sensitivity to disease subtype and duration. We grouped the available records (91 351 for Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor and 68 092 for Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale) by these two factors, and statistically compared the resulting groups using a novel approach based on Monte Carlo permutation analysis that was designed to cope with the intrinsic sparsity of registry data. Next, we used the patient-reported outcomes to draw novel insights into the developmental time course of subtypes; in particular, the period preceding the transition from relapsing to progressive forms. We report a robust main effect of disease subtype on the patient-reported outcomes and interactions of disease subtype with duration (all P &lt; 0.0001). Specifically, patient-reported outcomes worsen with disease duration for all subtypes (all P &lt; 0.0001) apart from benign multiple sclerosis (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor: P = 0.796; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale: P = 0.983). Furthermore, the patient-reported outcomes of each subtype are statistically different from those of the other subtypes at all time bins (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale motor: all P &lt; 0.05; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale: all P &lt; 0.01) except when comparing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with benign multiple sclerosis and primary progressive multiple sclerosis with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Notably, there were statistically significant differences between relapsing-remitting and progressive subtypes at disease onset. Critically, the patient-reported outcomes are sensitive to future transitions to progressive subtypes, with individuals who transition presenting with higher patient-reported outcomes in their relapsing-remitting phase compared to individuals who don’t transition since onset (all P &lt; 0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes capture different patterns of physical worsening over disease length and across subtypes; therefore, they are a valid tool to measure the physical impact of multiple sclerosis over the long-term and cost-effectively. Furthermore, more advanced physical disability manifests years before clinical detection of progressive subtypes, adding evidence to the presence of a multiple sclerosis prodrome.</p

Comparing the pathology, clinical and demographic characteristics of younger and older-onset multiple sclerosis

Objective: Older people with multiple sclerosis have a less active radiological and clinical presentation, but many still attain significant levels of disability; but what drives worsening disability in this group? Methods: We used data from the UK MS Register to characterise demographics and clinical features of late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS; symptom onset at ≥50 years), compared to adult-onset MS (AOMS; onset18-49 years). We performed a pathology study of a separate MS cohort with a later onset (n=18, mean age of onset 54 years) versus AOMS (n=23, age of onset 30 years). Results: In the Register cohort there were 1608 (9.4%) with LOMS. When compared with AOMS, there was a lower proportion of females, a higher proportion of primary progressive MS, a higher level of disability at diagnosis (median MS impact scale 36.7 v 28.3, p&lt;0.001), and a higher proportion of gait-related initial symptoms. People with LOMS were less likely to receive a high efficacy disease modifying treatment and attained substantial disability sooner. Controlling for age of death and sex, neuron density in the thalamus and pons decreased with onset-age, whilst actively demyelinating lesions and compartmentalised inflammation was greatest in AOMS. Only neuron density, and not demyelination or the extent of compartmentalised inflammation, correlated with disability outcomes in older-onset MS. Interpretation: The more progressive nature of older-onset MS is associated with significant neurodegeneration but infrequent inflammatory demyelination. These findings have implications for the assessment and treatment of MS in older people. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Disease-modifying treatment and disability progression in subclasses of patients with primary progressive MS: results from the Big MS Data Network

International audienceBackground: Effectiveness of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in people affected by primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is limited. Whether specific subgroups may benefit more from DMT in a real-world setting remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate the potential effect of DMT on disability worsening among patients with PPMS stratified by different disability trajectories.Methods: Within the framework of the Big MS Data network, we merged data from the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, the Swedish and Italian MS registries, and MSBase. We identified patients with PPMS that started DMT or were never treated during the observed period. Subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics were selected by propensity score matching. Disability outcomes were analysed in time-to-recurrent event analyses, which were repeated in subclasses with different disability trajectories determined by latent class mixed models.Results: Of the 3243 included patients, we matched 739 treated and 1330 untreated patients with a median follow-up of 3 years after pairwise censoring. No difference in the risk of confirmed disability worsening (CDW) was observed between the groups in the fully matched dataset (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.23, p=0.127). However, we found a lower risk for CDW among the class of treated patients with an aggressive disability trajectory (n=360, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92, p=0.014).Conclusions: In line with previous studies, our data suggest that DMT does not ameliorate disability worsening in PPMS, in general. However, we observed a beneficial effect of DMT on disability worsening in patients with aggressive predicted disability trajectories