36 research outputs found

    The impact of the environment on health by country: a meta-synthesis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Health gains that environmental interventions could achieve are main questions when choosing environmental health action to prevent disease. The World Health Organization has recently released profiles of environmental burden of disease for 192 countries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>These country profiles provide an estimate of the health impacts from the three major risk factors 'unsafe water, sanitation & hygiene', 'indoor air pollution from solid fuel use' and 'outdoor air pollution'. The profiles also provide an estimate of preventable health impacts by the environment as a whole. While the estimates for the three risk factors are based on country exposures, the estimates of health gains for total environmental improvements are based on a review of the literature supplemented by expert opinion and combined with country health statistics.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Between 13% and 37% of the countries' disease burden could be prevented by environmental improvements, resulting globally in about 13 million deaths per year. It is estimated that about four million of these could be prevented by improving water, sanitation and hygiene, and indoor and outdoor air alone. The number of environmental DALYs per 1000 capita per year ranges between 14 and 316 according to the country. An analysis by disease group points to main preventions opportunities for each country.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Notwithstanding the uncertainties in their calculation, these estimates provide an overview of opportunities for prevention through healthier environments. The estimates show that for similar national incomes, the environmental burden of disease can typically vary by a factor five. This analysis also shows that safer water, sanitation and hygiene, and safer fuels for cooking could significantly reduce child mortality, namely by more than 25% in 20 of the lowest income countries.</p

    Immunological resilience and biodiversity for prevention of allergic diseases and asthma

    Get PDF
    Increase of allergic conditions has occurred at the same pace with the Great Acceleration, which stands for the rapid growth rate of human activities upon earth from 1950s. Changes of environment and lifestyle along with escalating urbanization are acknowledged as the main underlying causes. Secondary (tertiary) prevention for better disease control has advanced considerably with innovations for oral immunotherapy and effective treatment of inflammation with corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and biological medications. Patients are less disabled than before. However, primary prevention has remained a dilemma. Factors predicting allergy and asthma risk have proven complex: Risk factors increase the risk, while protective factors counteract them. Interaction of human body with environmental biodiversity with micro-organisms and biogenic compounds as well as the central role of epigenetic adaptation in immune homeostasis have given new insight. Allergic diseases are good indicators of the twisted relation to environment. In various non-communicable diseases, the protective mode of the immune system indicates low-grade inflammation without apparent cause. Giving microbes, pro- and prebiotics, has shown some promise in prevention and treatment. The real-world public health programme in Finland (2008-2018) emphasized nature relatedness and protective factors for immunological resilience, instead of avoidance. The nationwide action mitigated the allergy burden, but in the lack of controls, primary preventive effect remains to be proven. The first results of controlled biodiversity interventions are promising. In the fast urbanizing world, new approaches are called for allergy prevention, which also has a major cost saving potential.Peer reviewe

    Age and Age Discordance Associations with Condomless Sex Among Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Full text link
    We explored the effect of older partner's age and age difference between partners on condomless sex among men who have sex with men (MSM). We analyzed dyads (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1720) from participants (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;969) in the Sexual Acquisition Transmission of HIV Cooperative Agreement Program. We used modified Poisson regression to model the probability of a sexual encounter's being condomless as a function of older partner's age and age difference between partners adjusting for HIV status, substance use, race/ethnicity, and partner type. We found an interaction between older partner's age and age difference (p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.05). Condomless sex decreased with increasing age of the older partner when the age difference was 5-9&nbsp;years (p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.004) or ≥10&nbsp;years (p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.04), but not when &lt;5&nbsp;years. Condomless sex was less likely among older MSM when there was ≥5&nbsp;years age difference between partners than &lt;5&nbsp;years difference. Both age and age discordance affect the likelihood of a sexual encounter between MSM being condomless

    Medical follow-up for workers exposed to bladder carcinogens: the French evidence-based and pragmatic statement

    Full text link

    Mortality from occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in Finland

    No full text
    corecore