Non-beneficial pediatric research : individual and social interests

Biomedical research involving human subjects is an arena of conflicts of interests. One of the most important conflicts is between interests of participants and interests of future patients. Legal regulations and ethical guidelines are instruments designed to help find a fair balance between risks and burdens taken by research subjects and development of knowledge and new treatment. There is an universally accepted ethical principle, which states that it is not ethically allowed to sacrifice individual interests for the sake of society and science. This is the principle of precedence of individual. But there is a problem with how to interpret the principle of precedence of individual in the context of research without prospect of future benefit involving children. There are proposals trying to reconcile non-beneficial research involving children with the concept of the best interests. We assert that this reconciliation is flawed and propose an interpretation of the principle of precedence of individual as follows: not all, but only the most important interests of participants, must be guaranteed; this principle should be interpreted as the secure participant standard. In consequence, the issue of permissible risk ceiling becomes ethically crucial in research with incompetent subjects

The fitness of dispersing spotted hyaena sons is influenced by maternal social status

Life history theory predicts that mothers should provide their offspring with a privileged upbringing if this enhances their offspring's and their own fitness. In many mammals, high-ranking mothers provide their offspring with a privileged upbringing. Whether dispersing sons gain fitness benefits during adulthood from such privileges (a 'silver spoon' effect) has rarely been examined. In this paper, we show that in the complex, female-dominated society of spotted hyaenas, high-born sons grew at higher rates, were more likely to disperse to clans offering the best fitness prospects, started reproducing earlier and had a higher reproductive value than did lower-born sons. This illustrates the evolutionary importance of maternal effects even in societies in which male size or fighting ability does not influence fitness. By demonstrating for the first time in a non-human mammal that maternal status influences immigration patterns, the study also advances our understanding of two key ecological and evolutionary processes, dispersal and habitat selection

Production of dust by massive stars at high redshift

The large amounts of dust detected in sub-millimeter galaxies and quasars at high redshift pose a challenge to galaxy formation models and theories of cosmic dust formation. At z > 6 only stars of relatively high mass (> 3 Msun) are sufficiently short-lived to be potential stellar sources of dust. This review is devoted to identifying and quantifying the most important stellar channels of rapid dust formation. We ascertain the dust production efficiency of stars in the mass range 3-40 Msun using both observed and theoretical dust yields of evolved massive stars and supernovae (SNe) and provide analytical expressions for the dust production efficiencies in various scenarios. We also address the strong sensitivity of the total dust productivity to the initial mass function. From simple considerations, we find that, in the early Universe, high-mass (> 3 Msun) asymptotic giant branch stars can only be dominant dust producers if SNe generate <~ 3 x 10^-3 Msun of dust whereas SNe prevail if they are more efficient. We address the challenges in inferring dust masses and star-formation rates from observations of high-redshift galaxies. We conclude that significant SN dust production at high redshift is likely required to reproduce current dust mass estimates, possibly coupled with rapid dust grain growth in the interstellar medium.Comment: 72 pages, 9 figures, 5 tables; to be published in The Astronomy and Astrophysics Revie

Brain size regulations by cbp haploinsufficiency evaluated by in-vivo MRI based volumetry

The Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome (RSTS) is a congenital disease that affects brain development causing severe cognitive deficits. In most cases the disease is associated with dominant mutations in the gene encoding the CREB binding protein (CBP). In this work, we present the first quantitative analysis of brain abnormalities in a mouse model of RSTS using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and two novel self-developed automated algorithms for image volumetric analysis. Our results quantitatively confirm key syndromic features observed in RSTS patients, such as reductions in brain size (-16.31%, p < 0.05), white matter volume (-16.00%, p < 0.05), and corpus callosum (-12.40%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, they provide new insight into the developmental origin of the disease. By comparing brain tissues in a region by region basis between cbp(+/-) and cbp(+/+) littermates, we found that cbp haploinsufficiency is specifically associated with significant reductions in prosencephalic tissue, such us in the olfactory bulb and neocortex, whereas regions evolved from the embryonic rhombencephalon were spared. Despite the large volume reductions, the proportion between gray-, white-matter and cerebrospinal fluid were conserved, suggesting a role of CBP in brain size regulation. The commonalities with holoprosencephaly and arhinencephaly conditions suggest the inclusion of RSTS in the family of neuronal migration disorders.We are grateful to Begona Fernandez for her excellent technical assistance. We would like to thank S. Sawiak (Wolfson Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom) for the mouse brain tissue probability maps and the SPMmouse plug-in, and to N. Kovacevic (Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for the atlas of the mouse brain. Supported by grants from the Spanish MINECO to S.C. (BFU 2012-39958) and MINECO and FEDER to D.M. (TEC 2012-33778) and from MINECO (SAF2011-22855) and Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo/2012/005) to A.B. The Instituto de Neurociencias is "Centre of Excellence Severo Ochoa".Ateca Cabarga, JC.; Cosa, A.; Pallares, V.; Lopez-Atalaya, JP.; Barco, A.; Canals, S.; Moratal Pérez, D. (2015). Brain size regulations by cbp haploinsufficiency evaluated by in-vivo MRI based volumetry. Scientific Reports. 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16256S5Rubinstein, J. H. & Taybi, H. Broad thumbs and toes and facial abnormalities. A possible mental retardation syndrome. Am J Dis Child 105, 588–608 (1963).Van Belzen, M., Bartsch, O., Lacombe, D., Peters, D. J. & Hennekam, R. C. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (CREBBP, EP300). Eur J Hum Genet. 19, preceeding 118–120 (2011).Hennekam, R. C. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 14, 981–985 (2006).Wiley, S., Swayne, S., Rubinstein, J. H., Lanphear, N. E. & Stevens, C. A. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome medical guidelines. Am J Med Genet A. 119A, 101–110 (2003).Michail, J., Matsoukas, J. & Theodorou, S. Pouce bot arqué en forte abduction-extension et autres symptomes concomitants. Rev Chir Orthop 43, 142–146 (1957).Barco A. The Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: modeling mental impairment in the mouse. Genes Brain Behav 6, 32–39 (2007).Lopez-Atalaya, J. P., Valor, L. M. & Barco, A. Epigenetic factors in intellectual disability: the Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome as a paradigm of neurodevelopmental disorder with epigenetic origin. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 128, 139–176 (2014).Petrij, F., Giles, R. H., Dauwerse, H. G., Saris, J. J., Hennekam, R. C. M., Masuno, M., Tommerup, N., Van Ommen, G. J. B., Goodman, R. H., Peters, D. J. M. & Breuning, M. H. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP. Nature 376, 348–351 (1995).Zimmermann, N., Acosta, A. M., Kohlhase, J. & Bartsch, O. Confirmation of EP300 gene mutations as a rare cause of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 15, 837–842 (2007).Bartholdi, D. et al. Genetic heterogeneity in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: delineation of the phenotype of the first patients carrying mutations in EP300. J Med Genet. 44, 327–333 (2007).Roelfsema, J. H. et al. Genetic heterogeneity in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: mutations in both the CBP and EP300 genes cause disease. Am J Hum Genet. 76, 572–580 (2005).Tanaka, Y., Naruse, I., Maekawa, T., Masuya, H., Shiroishi, T. & Ishii, S. Abnormal skeletal patterning in embryos lacking a single Cbp allele: a partial similarity with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 10215–10220 (1997).López-Atalaya, J. P. et al. CBP is required for environmental enrichment-induced neurogenesis and cognitive enhancement. EMBO J 30, 4287–4298 (2011).Wang, J. et al. CBP histone acetyltransferase activity regulates embryonic neural differentiation in the normal and Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome brain. Dev Cell. 18, 114–125 (2010).Marzuillo, P. et al. Brain magnetic resonance in the routine management of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS) can prevent life-threatening events and neurological deficits. Am J Med Genet A. 164A, 2129–2132 (2014).de Kort, E., Conneman, N. & Diderich, K. A case of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and congenital neuroblastoma. Am J Med Genet A. 164A, 1332–1333 (2014).Lee, J. S. et al. Clinical and mutational spectrum in Korean patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: the spectrum of brain MRI abnormalities. Brain Dev. 37, 402–408 (2015).Marzuillo, P. et al. Novel cAMP binding protein-BP (CREBBP) mutation in a girl with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, GH deficiency, Arnold Chiari malformation and pituitary hypoplasia. BMC Med Genet. 14, 28 (2013). 10.1186/1471-2350-14-28.Li, Z. et al. Phenotypic expansion of the interstitial 16p13.3 duplication: a case report and review of the literature. Gene. 531, 502–505 (2013).Demeer, B. et al. Duplication 16p13.3 and the CREBBP gene: confirmation of the phenotype. Eur J Med Genet. 56, 26–31 (2013).Kumar, S., Suthar, R., Panigrahi, I. & Marwaha, R. K. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: Clinical profile of 11 patients and review of literature. Indian J Hum Genet. 18, 161–166 (2012).Giussani, C. et al. The association of neural axis and craniovertebral junction anomalies with scoliosis in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 28, 2163–2168 (2012).Parsley, L., Bellus, G., Handler, M. & Tsai, A. C. Identical twin sisters with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome associated with Chiari malformations and syrinx. Am J Med Genet A. 155A, 2766–2770 (2011).Thienpont, B. et al. Duplications of the critical Rubinstein-Taybi deletion region on chromosome 16p13.3 cause a novel recognisable syndrome. J Med Genet. 47, 155–161 (2010).Kim, S. H., Lim, B. C., Chae, J. H., Kim, K. J. & Hwang, Y. S. A case of Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome with a CREB-binding protein gene mutation. Korean J Pediatr. 53, 718–721 (2010).Wójcik, C. et al. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome associated with Chiari type I malformation caused by a large 16p13.3 microdeletion: a contiguous gene syndrome? Am J Med Genet A. 152A, 479–483 (2010).Wachter-Giner, T., Bieber, I., Warmuth-Metz, M., Bröcker, E. B. & Hamm, H. Multiple pilomatricomas and gliomatosis cerebri--a new association? Pediatr Dermatol. 26, 75–78 (2009).Verstegen, M. J., van den Munckhof, P., Troost, D. & Bouma, G. J. Multiple meningiomas in a patient with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Case report. J Neurosurg. 102, 167–168 (2005).Agarwal, R., Aggarwal, R., Kabra, M. & Deorari, A. K. Dandy-Walker malformation in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: a rare association. Clin Dysmorphol. 11, 223–224 (2002).Ihara, K., Kuromaru, R., Takemoto, M. & Hara, T. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: a girl with a history of neuroblastoma and premature thelarche. Am J Med Genet. 83, 365–366 (1999).Sener, R. N. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: cranial MR imaging findings. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19, 417–418 (1995).Robinson, T. W., Stewart, D. L. & Hersh, J. H. Monozygotic twins concordant for Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet. 45, 671–673 (1993).Guion-Almeida, M. L. & Richieri-Costa, A. Callosal agenesis, iris coloboma and megacolon in a Brazilian boy with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 43, 929–931 (1992).Albanese, A. et al. [Role of diagnostic imaging in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. personal experience with 8 cases]. Radiol Med. 81, 253–261 (1991).Rubinstein, J. H. Broad thumb-hallux (Rubinstein-Taybi) syndrome 1957-1988. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 6, 3–16 (1990).Hennekam, R. C., Stevens, C. A. & Van de Kamp, J. J. Etiology and recurrence risk in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 6, 56–64 (1990).Bonioli, E., Bellini, C. & Di Stefano, A. Unusual association: Dandy-Walker-like malformation in the Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 33, 420–421 (1989).Beluffi, G., Pazzaglia, U. E., Fiori, P., Pricca, P. & Poznanski, A. K. [Oto-palato-digital syndrome. Clinico-radiological study]. Radiol Med. 74, 176–184 (1987).Cantani, A. & Gagliesi, D. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Review of 732 cases and analysis of the typical traits. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2, 81–87 (1998).Viosca, J., Lopez-Atalaya, J. P., Olivares, R., Eckner, R. & Barco, A. Syndromic features and mild cognitive impairment in mice with genetic reduction on p300 activity: Differential contribution of p300 and CBP to Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome etiology. Neurobiol Dis. 37, 186–194 (2010).Martínez-Martínez, M. A., Pacheco-Torres, J., Borrell, V. & Canals, S. Phenotyping the central nervous system of the embryonic mouse by magnetic resonance microscopy. Neuroimage. 97, 95–106 (2014).Heikkinen, T. et al. Characterization of neurophysiological and behavioral changes, MRI brain volumetry and 1H MRS in zQ175 knock-in mouse model of Huntington’s disease. PLoS One. 7, e50717 (2012), 10.1371/journal.pone.0050717.Alarcón, J. M. et al. Chromatin acetylation, memory and LTP are impaired in CBP+/− mice: a model for the cognitive deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and its amelioration. Neuron. 42, 947–959 (2004).Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 Supp 1, S208–19 (2004).Smith, S. M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17, 143–155 (2002).Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–851 (2005).Sawiak, S. J., Wood, N. I., Williams, G. B., Morton, A. J. & Carpenter, T. A. Voxel-based morphometry in the R6/2 transgenic mouse reveals differences between genotypes not seen with manual 2D morphometry. Neurobiol Dis 33, 20–27 (2009).Kovačević, N. et al. A three-dimensional MRI atlas of the mouse brain with estimates of the average and variability. Cereb Cortex 15, 639–645 (2005).Zacharoff, L. et al. Cortical metabolites as biomarkers in the R6/2 model of Huntington’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 32, 502–514 (2012).Petryk, A., Graf, D. & Marcucio, R. Holoprosencephaly: signaling interactions between the brain and the face, the environment and the genes and the phenotypic variability in animal models and humans. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 4, 17–32 (2015).Solomon, B. D., Gropman, A. & Muenke, M. Holoprosencephaly Overview. In: GeneReviews (eds Pagon, R. A. et al.), Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2014, 2000 Dec 27 [Updated 2013 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1530/ [Date of access: September 4, 2015].Mazzone, D., Milana, A., Praticò, G. & Reitano, G. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome associated with Dandy-Walker cyst. Case report in a newborn. J Perinat Med. 17, 381–384 (1989).Barson, A. J. Proceedings: Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 49, 495 (1974).Tsui, D. et al. CBP regulates the differentiation of interneurons from ventral forebrain neural precursors during murine development. Dev Biol. 385, 230–241 (2014).Ross, M. E. & Walsh, C. A. Human brain malformations and their lessons for neuronal migration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 24, 1041–1070 (2001).Tanaka, T., Ling, B. C., Rubinstein, J. H. & Crone, K. R. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome in children with tethered spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 105, 261–264 (2006).Dubourg, C. et al. Holoprosencephaly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2, 2–8 (2007)