Biological therapy with TNF-inhibitors in pediatric rheumatology. Review of the litterature and personal experience

The therapeutic approach to JIA is sometimes very troublesome and progression to erosive polyarthritis may occur in all JIA categories. Only Methotrexate has shown efficacy and safety in a large controlled trial. Nevertheless, in many cases, drug resistance or intolerance has led to try other therapeutic options, with still debatable results. Therefore, there has been space, in the last few years, for new therapies as the TNF-inhibitors. This therapeutic approach has shown a dramatic clinical benefit in active polyarticular refractory JIA: the rate and rapidity of response have exceeded those of all other studied DMARDs. Preliminary data show that they are efficacious also for other pediatric rheumatic disease (spondyloarthropathies, autoimmune uveitis, dermatomyositis, Kawasaki syndrome and some auto- inflammatory diseases). TNF-inhibitors in JIA have demonstrated a favourable benefit-to-risk profile. However, as their use has increased worldwide, some unusual, usually not serious, adverse events have emerged. Severe infections, including TB, and deaths have been reported. Long-lasting active disease, systemic disease, concurrent and previous immunosuppressive therapies, all contribute to risk of infection and other serious AEs. Given the evidence that TNF has a primary role in the pathogenesis of JIA, particularly in joint destruction, neutralizing this cytokine early, within the window of opportunity, could halt or delay progression of joint damage and debilitating consequences of the disease. Thus, for JIA patients whose disease is not quickly controlled with MTX, TNF blockers may be considered as first-line treatment, although long-term safety data still need to be established

HIV replication leads to skewed maturation of CD8-positive T-cell responses in infected children

HIV-1 infection causes a severe T-cell impairment with alteration of immune response. However, in children the natural decline of lymphocytes and CD4 cells in early life makes it more difficult to monitor immunocompetence and progression of HIV-infection. Aim of this study was to characterize the CD8 response in non-vertically HIV-infected children exposed persistently to viremia and in HIV-infected children controlling efficiently viremia by ART, by analysing the effect of persistent viremia on CD4 and CD8 T-cells count, HIV-specific immune-response and naive/memory pattern of CD8 T-cell. Whereas, no differences of CD4 count between viremic patients and viral controllers were observed (1046.9 +/- 472.1 cells/microl vs 1101.3 +/- 415.4 cells/microl; p > 0.05), CD8 count was higher in the viremic patients (1080.6 +/- 652.1 cells/microl vs 747.5 +/- 389.9 cells/microl, p < 0.05). In viremic patients, HIV-specific CD8 T-cells correlated with viral load. However, in this group a loss of HIV-specific CD8 response was associated with a 7 fold decrease of naïve and increase of pre-effector CD8 T-cells (62.8% +/- 10.21% vs 10.37% +/- 7.91%, p < 0.03). Persistent exposure to viremia alters HIV-specific CD8 response possibly through a persistent immune activation process leading to exhaustion of naive CD8 T-cells and skewed maturation of memory subset. Therefore, memory CD8 T-cells might lose the ability to respond correctly and efficiently to HIV-antigen exposure

Long-term evaluation of infliximab in the treatment of persistently active juvenile idiopathic arthritis refractory to conventional therapy

Objectives: To evaluate, in long-term open label prospective study, infliximab as therapeutic choice for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) non responsive to conventional therapy. Methods: We enrolled to treat with infliximab 78 JIA patients (66 females, 12 males): the mean age was 20.7±7.1 years (median 20.9, range 5.4-34.9); mean JIA duration was 13.6±7.6 years (median 13.5, range 0.4-31.4). Infliximab, at dose of 3-10 mg/kg/infusion added to weekly subcutaneous Methotrexate or other previous DMARDs, was administered by intravenous infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter. Chest X-ray, Mantoux's test, electrocardiogram were performed at baseline; laboratory tests and clinical evaluation were performed at each infusion. Response was evaluated according to ACR improvement criteria. Results: Mean treatment period was 21.6 months±18.8 (median 14.7, range 1.4-72.4). Just after first infusion most of patients reported significant improvement in pain, fatigue, morning stiffness. Infliximab is still successfully administered to 23 patients (29.5%); 55 (70.5%) patients suspended because of: inefficacy (7), infusion reactions (17), adverse events (9), disease flare-up after a period of effectiveness on synovitis, pain, and morning stiffness (19), remission (2), lack of compliance to treatment (1). Infusion reactions, like dyspnea, flushing, chills, headache, hypotension, anxiety, throat oedema, were observed in 29 patients (34.5%). Anti-DNA antibodies were present in 7 patients (none developed Systemic Lupus Eritematous). Conclusions: Infliximab showed impressive effectiveness treating refractory JIA, although most of patients had to discontinue treatment because of disease flare-up or adverse events. Infliximab may represent a good therapeutic choice in patients non-responders to Methotrexate

Temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: treatment with an orthodontic appliance

Introduction and purpose: About 65% of children suffering from juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) shows a more or less marked involvement of temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) with altered mandibular growth, resorption of the condyles, occlusary instability, reduced chewing ability and facial dysmorphia. The purpose of our study is to prevent and to treat the progressive evolution of JIA on craniofacial growth and morphology with a functional appliance; surgery should be considered only in so far as the adequacy of TMJ movement is concemed. Methods: From 1992 until now 72 children with proved JIA and TMJ involvement have been treated (50 females, 22 males, aged 6 to 16 years old). TMJ involvement was bilateral in 61% and unilateral in 39% of patients. A diagnostic workup was carried out involving tomograms of TMJ and cephalometric radiograph and analysis. The authors used a bimaxillary activator in the attempt to modify the unfavourable growth pattern and provide a gradual ante-rotation of the jaw. Results: Almost all JIA patients showed satisfactory long term results, easing of pain, reduced skeletal discrepancy, increased function and good facial profile. Conclusions: The long term results of this study indicate that orthopaedic therapy might control the vicious circle of the malocclusion in children with JIA, preventing exacerbation of mandibular clockwise rotation. Surgical intervention for the improvement of TMJ function should be considered only if a severe restricted state is imminent

Anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) treatment for inflammatory ocular diseases

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen expressed on B cells and widely used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis. There is a growing amount of literature which suggests that rituximab may be useful for inflammatory ocular diseases and intraocular lymphoma. Few cases have been reported on treatment of refractory scleritis, peripherative ulcerative keratitis, uveitis and ocular surface inflammatory disorders. Rituximab may be effective in the treatment of ocular inflammatory diseases in particular the most aggressive, recalcitrant and sight-threatening forms of inflammation such as uveitis associated to juvenile idiopathic arthritis. We review the literature covering the use of Rituximab in these conditions and report our results on the efficacy of Rituximab in the treatment of 8 children with very severe and long-standing uveitis who failed to respond to one or more TNF blockers. Our patients showed improvement in activity of uveitis, reduction of concomitant corticosteroids and immunosuppressants after a mean follow-up time of 14.87 months on rituximab. No serious adverse events were encountered in our treated patients. Although further studies are needed for assessing the efficacy of rituximab and the exact dosing regimen, rituximab may be considered as a treatment alternative in patients with the most aggressive forms of inflammatory ocular diseases who fail to respond to conventional and anti-TNF immunosuppressive agent