32 research outputs found
Π’Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ°
Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ°, ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ Ρ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (111), ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ² Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ, Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ ANSYS ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ, ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ°, Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ°, Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π΅Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ°, Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ Ρ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (111)
Dynamic political contexts and power asymmetries: the cases of the Blue Nile and the Yarmouk Rivers
This paper explores the evolving patterns of hydropolitical relations in the dynamic contexts of Yarmouk and Blue Nile Rivers in comparison. The analysis aims at shedding light over the complex implications that recent political and social changes have aroused for the water disputes between Jordan and Syria on the one hand, and Ethiopia and Egypt on the other. In both basins, cooperative efforts toward the integrated management of transboundary waters have been only partially effective and largely undermined by the perpetuation of unilateral actions by riparian states. In the case studies, the lack of a basin-wide vision over the control and use of shared waters has resulted in disputes among the basin states and ultimately in an unsustainable, unfair, and unwise utilization of the resources. This paper argues that a substantive and effective integration of national water policies is unlikely to occur, unless power asymmetries are properly addressed in order to overcome the likelihood of hegemonic regimes
Recommended from our members
Transboundary water interaction III: contest and compliance
This paper serves international water conflict resolution efforts by examining the ways that states contest hegemonic transboundary water arrangements. The conceptual framework of dynamic transboundary water interaction that it presents integrates theories about change and counter-hegemony to ascertain coercive, leverage, and liberating mechanisms through which contest and transformation of an arrangement occur. While the mechanisms can be active through sociopolitical processes either of compliance or of contest of the arrangement, most transboundary water interaction is found to contain elements of both. The role of power asymmetry is interpreted through classification of intervention strategies that seek to either influence or challenge the arrangements. Coexisting contest and compliance serve to explain in part the stasis on the Jordan and Ganges rivers (where the non-hegemons have in effect consented to the arrangement), as well as the changes on the Tigris and Mekong rivers, and even more rapid changes on the Amu Darya and Nile rivers (where the non-hegemons have confronted power asymmetry through influence and challenge). The framework also stresses how transboundary water events that may appear isolated are more accurately read within the many sociopolitical processes and arrangements they are shaped by. By clarifying the typically murky dynamics of interstate relations over transboundary waters, furthermore, the framework exposes a new suite of entry points for hydro-diplomatic initiatives
Recommended from our members
Ten new insights in climate science 2022
Non-technical summary
We summarize what we assess as the past year's most important findings within climate change research: limits to adaptation, vulnerability hotspots, new threats coming from the climateβhealth nexus, climate (im)mobility and security, sustainable practices for land use and finance, losses and damages, inclusive societal climate decisions and ways to overcome structural barriers to accelerate mitigation and limit global warming to below 2Β°C.
Technical summary
We synthesize 10 topics within climate research where there have been significant advances or emerging scientific consensus since January 2021. The selection of these insights was based on input from an international open call with broad disciplinary scope. Findings concern: (1) new aspects of soft and hard limits to adaptation; (2) the emergence of regional vulnerability hotspots from climate impacts and human vulnerability; (3) new threats on the climateβhealth horizon β some involving plants and animals; (4) climate (im)mobility and the need for anticipatory action; (5) security and climate; (6) sustainable land management as a prerequisite to land-based solutions; (7) sustainable finance practices in the private sector and the need for political guidance; (8) the urgent planetary imperative for addressing losses and damages; (9) inclusive societal choices for climate-resilient development and (10) how to overcome barriers to accelerate mitigation and limit global warming to below 2Β°C.
Social media summary
Science has evidence on barriers to mitigation and how to overcome them to avoid limits to adaptation across multiple fields
WATER-Model: An Optimal Allocation of Water Resources in Turkey, Syria and Iraq
Political instability of several countries in the Middle East is overshadowing one of the biggest challenges of the upcoming century: Water - a natural resource that is easily taken for granted, but whose scarcity might lead to serious conflicts. This paper investigates an optimal Water Allocation of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivershed by introducing the WATER-Model. A series of scenarios are analyzed to examine the effects of different levels of cooperation for an optimal water allocation. Special emphasize is put on the effects of filling new Turkish reservoirs which can cause additional welfare losses if these actions are not done on a basin-wide coordinated basis. Modeling results show that Turkey is most efficient in its water usage. However, using the water for irrigation purposes in Turkey, instead of the Iraqi or Syrian domestic and industrial sector, decreases the overall welfare. Especially the Euphrates basin might thus encounter losses of up to 33% due to such strategic behaviour. The predicted water demand growth in the region is going to increase this water scarcity further. Minimum flow treaties between riparian countries, however, can help to increase the overall welfare and should therefore be fostered