Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome associated with COVID-19: An Emulated Target Trial Analysis.

RATIONALE: Whether COVID patients may benefit from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared with conventional invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect of ECMO on 90-Day mortality vs IMV only Methods: Among 4,244 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 included in a multicenter cohort study, we emulated a target trial comparing the treatment strategies of initiating ECMO vs. no ECMO within 7 days of IMV in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FiO2 <80 or PaCO2 ≥60 mmHg). We controlled for confounding using a multivariable Cox model based on predefined variables. MAIN RESULTS: 1,235 patients met the full eligibility criteria for the emulated trial, among whom 164 patients initiated ECMO. The ECMO strategy had a higher survival probability at Day-7 from the onset of eligibility criteria (87% vs 83%, risk difference: 4%, 95% CI 0;9%) which decreased during follow-up (survival at Day-90: 63% vs 65%, risk difference: -2%, 95% CI -10;5%). However, ECMO was associated with higher survival when performed in high-volume ECMO centers or in regions where a specific ECMO network organization was set up to handle high demand, and when initiated within the first 4 days of MV and in profoundly hypoxemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: In an emulated trial based on a nationwide COVID-19 cohort, we found differential survival over time of an ECMO compared with a no-ECMO strategy. However, ECMO was consistently associated with better outcomes when performed in high-volume centers and in regions with ECMO capacities specifically organized to handle high demand. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Abstract LB565: Efficacy of a highly potent and selective KIT V654A inhibitor for treatment of imatinib resistant GIST

Abstract Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common type of sarcoma, with approximately 5,000 patients diagnosed per year in the US. Approximately 80% of patients with GIST present with mutations in the c-KIT oncogene at exon 9 or 11, which leads to constitutive, ligand-independent activation of the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase. For patients with metastatic GIST, frontline therapy with imatinib is effective, with a response rate of approximately 51-54% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 19-23 months, in a molecularly unselected population. Other agents are approved for advanced GIST, without molecular selection, after progression on imatinib, including sunitinib, regorafenib, and ripretinib; however, response rates are less than 10% with PFS of approximately 5-6 months. Notably, patients who progress on imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors may develop a variety of on-target resistance mutations in the KIT oncogene, such as those in exon 17 (including at amino acids D816 and D820, activation loop mutation), exon 13 (V654A, ATP-binding region mutation), and less frequently in exon 14 (T670I, gatekeeper mutation). Several KIT inhibitors have been developed to potently target the exon 17 resistance mutations (avapritinib and ripretinib); however, there remains an important medical need in 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy in a molecularly unselected population of imatinib-resistant GIST. This suggests more broad-spectrum KIT inhibition is likely required, a hypothesis supported by the observation of large inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity of KIT secondary mutations across hundreds of samples obtained from patients with GIST treated with avapritinib. Sequencing data from the NAVIGATOR phase 1 trial (NCT02508532) revealed that patients with KIT mutant GIST and with the KIT V654A secondary resistance mutation had a poor response to treatment with avapritinib. To address this, we developed a highly potent and selective inhibitor of KIT V654A. This inhibitor showed dose-dependent modulation of downstream pharmacodynamic markers and induced tumor regression in a mastocytoma xenograft model driven by an exon 11 plus 13 V654A resistance mutation. Importantly, this inhibitor was generally well-tolerated and showed high selectivity over wild-type KIT. These findings suggest this novel KIT inhibitor has the potential to be used as a single agent or combination therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant GIST harboring the KIT V654A mutation. Citation Format: Alexandra R. Grassian, Joseph Kim, Omar Ahmad, Kevin Barvian, Alison Davis, Tom Dineen, Wei Hu, Ebby Job, Ludivine Moine, Kate Newberry, Maria Roche, Doug Shorten, Yeon Sook Choi, Francis Wolenski, Sebastian Bauer, Cesar Serrano, Jonathan Trent, Suzanne George. Efficacy of a highly potent and selective KIT V654A inhibitor for treatment of imatinib resistant GIST [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB565

Site-Dependent Degradation of a Non-Cleavable Auristatin-Based Linker-Payload in Rodent Plasma and Its Effect on ADC Efficacy

<div><p>The efficacy of an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is dependent on the properties of its linker-payload which must remain stable while in systemic circulation but undergo efficient processing upon internalization into target cells. Here, we examine the stability of a non-cleavable Amino-PEG6-based linker bearing the monomethyl auristatin D (MMAD) payload site-specifically conjugated at multiple positions on an antibody. Enzymatic conjugation with transglutaminase allows us to create a stable amide linkage that remains intact across all tested conjugation sites on the antibody, and provides us with an opportunity to examine the stability of the auristatin payload itself. We report a position-dependent degradation of the C terminus of MMAD in rodent plasma that has a detrimental effect on its potency. The MMAD cleavage can be eliminated by either modifying the C terminus of the toxin, or by selection of conjugation site. Both approaches result in improved stability and potency <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. Furthermore, we show that the MMAD metabolism in mouse plasma is likely mediated by a serine-based hydrolase, appears much less pronounced in rat, and was not detected in cynomolgus monkey or human plasma. Clarifying these species differences and controlling toxin degradation to optimize ADC stability in rodents is essential to make the best ADC selection from preclinical models. The data presented here demonstrate that site selection and toxin susceptibility to mouse plasma degradation are important considerations in the design of non-cleavable ADCs, and further highlight the benefits of site-specific conjugation methods.</p></div

Stability studies of site-specific non-cleavable ADCs.

<p>a) Positions of conjugation sites on an antibody. b) Structure of the PEG6-C2-MMAD non-cleavable payload conjugated to the glutamine tag on the antibody, and its cleavage product. The glutamine residue is shown in blue. c) Structure of the PEG6-C2-Aur3377 non-cleavable payload conjugated to the glutamine tag shown in blue.</p

Protease inhibition studies of the PEG6-C2-MMAD degradation in mouse plasma.

<p>“Yes” indicates the same extent of cleavage as observed in plasma without inhibitors, “partial” indicates reduced cleavage compared to uninhibited plasma, while “no” indicates that no degradation was observed. All assays were carried out at pH 7.4.</p><p>Protease inhibition studies of the PEG6-C2-MMAD degradation in mouse plasma.</p

Effect of Attachment Site on Stability of Cleavable Antibody Drug Conjugates

The systemic stability of the antibody–drug linker is crucial for delivery of an intact antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) to target-expressing tumors. Linkers stable in circulation but readily processed in the target cell are necessary for both safety and potency of the delivered conjugate. Here, we report a range of stabilities for an auristatin-based payload site-specifically attached through a cleavable valine-citrulline-<i>p</i>-aminobenzylcarbamate (VC-PABC) linker across various sites on an antibody. We demonstrate that the conjugation site plays an important role in determining VC-PABC linker stability in mouse plasma, and that the stability of the linker positively correlates with ADC cytotoxic potency both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we show that the VC-PABC cleavage in mouse plasma is not mediated by Cathepsin B, the protease thought to be primarily responsible for linker processing in the lysosomal degradation pathway. Although the VC-PABC cleavage is not detected in primate plasma in vitro, linker stabilization in the mouse is an essential prerequisite for designing successful efficacy and safety studies in rodents during preclinical stages of ADC programs. The divergence of linker metabolism in mouse plasma and its intracellular cleavage offers an opportunity for linker optimization in the circulation without compromising its efficient payload release in the target cell

Degradation of the C-terminal portion of the PEG6-C2-MMAD payload in the plasma of different species.

<p>Degradation is calculated as percentage of payload cleaved. Calculations are based on DAR values obtained from HIC analysis of the Site A-PEG6-2-MMAD conjugate before and after incubation in plasma for 4.5 days in three independent experiments.</p

Mass spectrometric analysis of non-cleavable conjugates.

<p>The Fig labels represent experimentally observed masses for conjugates before (upper panel) and after (lower panel) <i>in vivo</i> exposure. a) Intact mass deconvolution of C16 Site A-PEG6-C2-MMAD conjugate. The metabolic products of the DAR 2 species show a mass loss from either 1 x 186 Da (one payload) or 2 x 186 Da (both payloads). b) Intact mass of C16 Site I-PEG6-C2-MMAD conjugate. The metabolic product shows a 186 Da loss from one of the conjugated payloads. c) Intact mass of C16 Site A-PEG6-C2-Aur3377 conjugate. The <i>in vivo</i> exposed conjugate shows no mass shift compared to the untreated compound.</p