7 research outputs found

    Sleep Symptoms and Polysomnographic Patterns of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Obese Children

    Get PDF
    How to Cite This Article: Tavasoli A, Jalilolghadr Sh, Lotfi Sh. Sleep symptoms and polysomnographic patterns of obstructive sleep apnea in obese children. Iran J Child Neurol. Winter 2016; 10 (1):14-20.AbstractObjectiveThis study was conducted to investigate the sleep symptoms and polysomnographic patterns of obstructive sleep apnea in overweight and obese children.Materials & MethodsOverweight or obese children aging 6-18 yr old referred during 2010 to Endocrinology Clinic of Ghods Hospital in Ghazvin, central Iran were enrolled in the study. Polysomnography was done for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea and the BEARS and Children’s Sleep Habits questionnaires were used to survey sleep behaviors.ResultsWe enrolled 30 children (14 males, 16 females). Twenty-one cases had body mass index (BMI) >95% and 9 had 85% <BMI<95%. Respiratory disturbance in polysomnography was seen in 90% of cases. Symptoms included snoring 18 (60%); frequent awakening 17 (56.6%); nocturnal sweating 15 (50%); daytime sleepiness 12 (40%); sleep talking 10 (33.3%); bedtime resistance 9 (30%); nightmares 8 (26.6%); waking up problems 6 (20%); sleep walking 6 (20%); difficult breathing 4 (13.3%); bedwetting 3 (10%) and sleep onset delay 2 (6.06%). Severe, moderate and mild apnea – hypopnea Index (AHI) were seen in 12, 9 and 6 subjects, respectively. A significant Pearson correlation was found between the BMI values and sleep latency.ConclusionPrevalence of obstructive sleep apnea is high among overweight and obese children. Physicians should be familiar with its manifestations and consider polysomnography as an invaluable diagnostic test. There was no relation between the degree of obesity and severity of obstructive sleep apnea

    Comparison of Photocatalytic Membrane Reactor Types for the Degradation of an Organic Molecule by TiO₂-Coated PES Membrane

    Get PDF
    Photocatalytic membrane reactors with different configurations (design, flow modes and light sources) have been widely applied for pollutant removal. A thorough understanding of the contribution of reactor design to performance is required to be able to compare photocatalytic materials. Reactors with different flow designs are implemented for process efficiency comparisons. Several figures-of-merit, namely adapted space-time yield (STY) and photocatalytic space-time yield (PSTY), specific energy consumption (SEC) and degradation rate constants, were used to assess the performance of batch, flow-along and flow-through reactors. A fair comparison of reactor performance, considering throughput together with energy efficiency and photocatalytic activity, was only possible with the modified PSTY. When comparing the three reactors at the example of methylene blue (MB) degradation under LED irradiation, flow-through proved to be the most efficient design. PSTY1/PSTY2 values were approximately 10 times higher than both the batch and flow-along processes. The highest activity of such a reactor is attributed to its unique flow design which allowed the reaction to take place not only on the outer surface of the membrane but also within its pores. The enhancement of the mass transfer when flowing in a narrow space (220 nm in flow-through) contributes to an additional MB removal. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland

    A Genetic Algorithm Based Optimal Pricing Strategy in Electricity Market

    No full text
    International audienc

    A slacks-based measure approach for efficiency decomposition in multi-period two-stage systems

    No full text
    Two-stage production systems are often encountered in many real applications where the production process is divided into two processes. In contrast to the conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, two-stage DEA models take the operations of the internal processes into account. A number of studies have used two-stage DEA models in order to evaluate the performance of decision making units (DMUs) having a network structure. In this paper, we use a non-radial DEA model called the network slacks-based measure (NSBM) model to measure the efficiency of a system with a multi-period two-stage structure. Then we describe the properties of the proposed model in details. Moreover, we shall decompose the overall efficiency of the system over a number of time periods as a weighted average of the efficiency in each period. The efficiency of the stages, in respect to the entire periods shall be decomposed in terms of the weighted average efficiency of the stages in each period. Finally, the real data of Mellat bank branches in Tehran extracted from extant literature is used to illustrate the proposed approach

    Efficiency Decomposition in Two-Stage Network in Data Envelopment Analysis with Undesirable Intermediate Measures and Fuzzy Input and Output

    No full text
    This paper presents a model for the efficiency evaluation of decision-making units comprising a network structure with undesirable intermediate measures. This model is then generalised to evaluate the efficiency of network decision-making units with triangular fuzzy data and undesirable intermediate measures. In this study, data envelopment analysis (DEA) models with fuzzy network structures and undesirable intermediate measures are considered and solved as linear triangular fuzzy planning problems. With numerical results, the application of the proposed model in the chipboard industry of wood lumber has been shown

    Mass Casualty Management in Disaster Scene: A Systematic Review of OR&MS research in Humanitarian Operations

    Full text link
    [EN] Disasters are usually managed through a four-phase cycle including mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. The first two phases happen before a disaster and the last two after it. This survey focuses on casualty management (CM), which is one of the actions taken in the response phase of a disaster. Right after a severe disaster strikes, we may be confronted with a large number of casualties in a very short period of time. These casualties are in need of urgent treatment and their survival depends on a rapid response. Therefore, managing resources in the first few hours after a disaster is critical and efficient CM can significantly increase the survival rate of casualties. Uncertainty in the location of a disaster, disruption to transportation networks, scarcity of resources and possible deaths of rescue and medical teams due to the disaster in such situations make it hard to manage casualties. In this survey, we focus on CM for disasters where the following five steps are taken, respectively: (i) Resource dispatching/search and rescue, (ii) on-site triage, (iii) on-site medical assistance, (iv) transportation to hospitals and (v) triage and comprehensive treatment. With a special focus on Operations Research (OR) techniques, we categorize the existing research papers and case studies in each of these steps. Then, by critically observing and investigating gaps, trends and the practicality of the extant research studies, we suggest future directions for academics and practitioners.Ruben Ruiz is partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities, under the project "OPTEP-Port Terminal Operations Optimization"(No. RTI2018-094940-B-I00) financed with FEDER funds.Farahani, RZ.; Lotfi, MM.; Baghaian, A.; Ruiz García, R.; Rezapour, S. (2020). Mass Casualty Management in Disaster Scene: A Systematic Review of OR&MS research in Humanitarian Operations. European Journal of Operational Research. 287(3):787-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.005S7878192873Abdelgawad, H., & Abdulhai, B. (2009). Emergency evacuation planning as a network design problem: a critical review. Transportation Letters, 1(1), 41-58. doi:10.3328/tl.2009.01.01.41-58Abidi, H., de Leeuw, S., & Klumpp, M. (2014). Humanitarian supply chain performance management: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 592-608. doi:10.1108/scm-09-2013-0349Al Theeb, N., & Murray, C. (2016). Vehicle routing and resource distribution in postdisaster humanitarian relief operations. International Transactions in Operational Research, 24(6), 1253-1284. doi:10.1111/itor.12308Alinaghian, M., Aghaie, M., & Sabbagh, M. S. (2019). A mathematical model for location of temporary relief centers and dynamic routing of aerial rescue vehicles. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 131, 227-241. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.002Alizadeh, M., Amiri-Aref, M., Mustafee, N., & Matilal, S. (2019). A robust stochastic Casualty Collection Points location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(3), 965-983. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.018Al-Momani, N. M., & Harrald, J. R. (2003). Sensitivity of earthquake loss estimation model: how useful are the predictions. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 4(1), 1. doi:10.1504/ijram.2003.003433Alotaibi, E. T., Alqefari, S. S., & Koubaa, A. (2019). LSAR: Multi-UAV Collaboration for Search and Rescue Missions. IEEE Access, 7, 55817-55832. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2912306Altay, N., & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475-493. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016Esposito Amideo, A., Scaparra, M. P., & Kotiadis, K. (2019). Optimising shelter location and evacuation routing operations: The critical issues. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(2), 279-295. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.009Anaya-Arenas, A. M., Renaud, J., & Ruiz, A. (2014). Relief distribution networks: a systematic review. Annals of Operations Research, 223(1), 53-79. doi:10.1007/s10479-014-1581-yApte, A., Heidtke, C., & Salmerón, J. (2015). Casualty Collection Points Optimization: A Study for the District of Columbia. Interfaces, 45(2), 149-165. doi:10.1287/inte.2014.0757Baharmand, H., Comes, T., & Lauras, M. (2019). Bi-objective multi-layer location–allocation model for the immediate aftermath of sudden-onset disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 127, 86-110. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.002Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., & Smilowitz, K. (2008). Last Mile Distribution in Humanitarian Relief. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 51-63. doi:10.1080/15472450802023329Balcik, B., Bozkir, C. D. C., & Kundakcioglu, O. E. (2016). A literature review on inventory management in humanitarian supply chains. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 21(2), 101-116. doi:10.1016/j.sorms.2016.10.002Behl, A., & Dutta, P. (2018). Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1-2), 1001-1044. doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2806-2Berkoune, D., Renaud, J., Rekik, M., & Ruiz, A. (2012). Transportation in disaster response operations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(1), 23-32. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2011.05.002Besiou, M., Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2018). OR applied to humanitarian operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(2), 397-405. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.046Boonmee, C., Arimura, M., & Asada, T. (2017). Facility location optimization model for emergency humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 485-498. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.017Bravo, R. Z. B., Leiras, A., & Cyrino Oliveira, F. L. (2018). The Use of UAVs in Humanitarian Relief: An Application of POMDP-Based Methodology for Finding Victims. Production and Operations Management, 28(2), 421-440. doi:10.1111/poms.12930California Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development, 2016. Available online on http://oshpd.ca.gov/, Visited on 28 Nov (2016).Canes, M. (2015). Mais de 10 mil pessoas foram atingidas por tornado em Xanxerê, Available online onhttp://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/geral/noticia/2015-04/mais-de-10-mil-pessoas-foram-atingidas-por-tornado-em-xanxere, Visited on 20 Jan 2017).Çankaya, E., Ekici, A., & Özener, O. Ö. (2018). Humanitarian relief supplies distribution: an application of inventory routing problem. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1-2), 119-141. doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2781-7Cao, C., Li, C., Yang, Q., Liu, Y., & Qu, T. (2018). A novel multi-objective programming model of relief distribution for sustainable disaster supply chain in large-scale natural disasters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1422-1435. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.037Caunhye, A. M., Li, M., & Nie, X. (2015). A location-allocation model for casualty response planning during catastrophic radiological incidents. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 50, 32-44. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2015.02.001Caunhye, A. M., & Nie, X. (2018). A Stochastic Programming Model for Casualty Response Planning During Catastrophic Health Events. Transportation Science, 52(2), 437-453. doi:10.1287/trsc.2017.0777Caunhye, A. M., Nie, X., & Pokharel, S. (2012). Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(1), 4-13. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2011.04.004Chan, C. W., Green, L. V., Lu, Y., Leahy, N., & Yurt, R. (2013). Prioritizing Burn-Injured Patients During a Disaster. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(2), 170-190. doi:10.1287/msom.1120.0412Chen, L., & Miller-Hooks, E. (2012). Optimal team deployment in urban search and rescue. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(8), 984-999. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2012.03.004Christie, P. M. J., & Levary, R. R. (1998). Journal of Medical Systems, 22(5), 289-300. doi:10.1023/a:1020521909778Cohen, I., Mandelbaum, A., & Zychlinski, N. (2014). Minimizing mortality in a mass casualty event: fluid networks in support of modeling and staffing. IIE Transactions, 46(7), 728-741. doi:10.1080/0740817x.2013.855846Cook, W. D. (1977). A Model for the Evacuation of Casualties from a Field Hospital During a Crisis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 28(4), 963-974. doi:10.1057/jors.1977.194Cotta, C. (2011). Effective patient prioritization in mass casualty incidents using hyperheuristics and the pilot method. OR Spectrum, 33(3), 699-720. doi:10.1007/s00291-011-0238-3CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters) (2018). Cred Crunch 52 - Economic Losses, Poverty and Disasters: 1998-2017. Available at www.cred.be/sites/default/files/CredCrunch52.pdf.Davoodi, S. M. R., & Goli, A. (2019). An integrated disaster relief model based on covering tour using hybrid Benders decomposition and variable neighborhood search: Application in the Iranian context. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 130, 370-380. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.040De la Torre, L. E., Dolinskaya, I. S., & Smilowitz, K. R. (2012). Disaster relief routing: Integrating research and practice. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(1), 88-97. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2011.06.001Dean, M. D., & Nair, S. K. (2014). Mass-casualty triage: Distribution of victims to multiple hospitals using the SAVE model. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(1), 363-373. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.028Debacker, M., Van Utterbeeck, F., Ullrich, C., Dhondt, E., & Hubloue, I. (2016). SIMEDIS: a Discrete-Event Simulation Model for Testing Responses to Mass Casualty Incidents. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(12). doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0633-zDepartment of Homeland Security. National planning scenarios: Executive summaries. (2005)., Available athttp://cees.tamiu.edu/covertheborder/TOOLS/NationalPlanningSen.pdf(April 2005).Doan, X. V., & Shaw, D. (2019). Resource allocation when planning for simultaneous disasters. European Journal of Operational Research, 274(2), 687-709. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.015Drezner, T. (2004). Location of Casualty Collection Points. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22(6), 899-912. doi:10.1068/c13rEdrissi, A., Nourinejad, M., & Roorda, M. J. (2015). Transportation network reliability in emergency response. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 80, 56-73. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2015.05.005Edrissi, A., Poorzahedy, H., Nassiri, H., & Nourinejad, M. (2013). A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 261-275. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.008EM-DAT, Natural Disasters (2017). Available atwww.cred.be/sites/default/fles/adsr_2017.pdf.FEMA. National Incident Management System. (2008)., Available online onwww.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/25422, Visited on 11 Nov 2018.Fiedrich, F., Gehbauer, F., & Rickers, U. (2000). Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Safety Science, 35(1-3), 41-57. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00021-7Franco, C., Toner, E., Waldhorn, R., Maldin, B., O’Toole, T., & Inglesby, T. V. (2006). Systemic Collapse: Medical Care in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 4(2), 135-146. doi:10.1089/bsp.2006.4.135Frykberg, E. R. (2005). Triage: Principles and Practice. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 94(4), 272-278. doi:10.1177/145749690509400405Galindo, G., & Batta, R. (2013). Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(2), 201-211. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.039Ghasemi, P., Khalili-Damghani, K., Hafezalkotob, A., & Raissi, S. (2019). Uncertain multi-objective multi-commodity multi-period multi-vehicle location-allocation model for earthquake evacuation planning. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 350, 105-132. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2018.12.061Gong, Q., & Batta, R. (2007). Allocation and reallocation of ambulances to casualty clusters in a disaster relief operation. IIE Transactions, 39(1), 27-39. doi:10.1080/07408170600743938GPO Access Reports (2005). Chapter 24: Medical assistance. Available atwww.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/creports/pdf/sr109-322/ch24.pdfVisited on 30 Aug 2010.Gu, J., Zhou, Y., Das, A., Moon, I., & Lee, G. M. (2018). Medical relief shelter location problem with patient severity under a limited relief budget. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, 720-728. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.027Gupta, S., Starr, M. K., Farahani, R. Z., & Matinrad, N. (2016). Disaster Management from a POM Perspective: Mapping a New Domain. Production and Operations Management, 25(10), 1611-1637. doi:10.1111/poms.12591Gutjahr, W. J., & Nolz, P. C. (2016). Multicriteria optimization in humanitarian aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(2), 351-366. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.035Haghi, M., Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T., & Jolai, F. (2017). Developing a robust multi-objective model for pre/post disaster times under uncertainty in demand and resource. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 188-202. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.102Hallak, J., Koyuncu, M., & Miç, P. (2019). Determining shelter locations in conflict areas by multiobjective modeling: A case study in northern Syria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 38, 101202. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101202Hamp, Q., Zhang, R., Chen, L., Gorgis, O., Ostertag, T., Loschonsky, M., & Reindl, L. (2014). New technologies for the search of trapped victims. Ad Hoc Networks, 13, 69-82. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.06.005Hoyos, M. C., Morales, R. S., & Akhavan-Tabatabaei, R. (2015). OR models with stochastic components in disaster operations management: A literature survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 183-197. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.11.025Hu, X., Liu, Z., Yao, Y., Wang, N., & Dang, D. (2017). Crowdsourcing Model Research for the Identification of Post-Earthquake Rescue Objects. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 23(5), 863-881. doi:10.1080/13632469.2017.1342304Huang, K., Jiang, Y., Yuan, Y., & Zhao, L. (2015). Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 75, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2014.11.007Jacobson, E. U., Argon, N. T., & Ziya, S. (2012). Priority Assignment in Emergency Response. Operations Research, 60(4), 813-832. doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1075Jin, S., Jeong, S., Kim, J., & Kim, K. (2014). A logistics model for the transport of disaster victims with various injuries and survival probabilities. Annals of Operations Research, 230(1), 17-33. doi:10.1007/s10479-013-1515-0Jones, L.M., .Bernknopf, R., Cox, D., Goltz, J., Hudnut, K., Mileti, D. et al. (2008). The ShakeOut scenario. U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, Reston, VA, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1150/of2008-1150small.pdf.Jotshi, A., Gong, Q., & Batta, R. (2009). Dispatching and routing of emergency vehicles in disaster mitigation using data fusion. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(1), 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2008.02.005Kamali, B., Bish, D., & Glick, R. (2017). Optimal service order for mass-casualty incident response. European Journal of Operational Research, 261(1), 355-367. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.047Kang, J., Jeong, I.-J., & Kwun, J.-B. (2015). Optimal facility–final exit assignment algorithm for building complex evacuation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2015.03.012Karatas, M., Razi, N., & Gunal, M. M. (2017). An ILP and simulation model to optimize search and rescue helicopter operations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(11), 1335-1351. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0154-7Kilic, A., Dincer, M. C., & Gokce, M. A. (2014). Determining optimal treatment rate after a disaster. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(7), 1053-1067. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.52Kim, S., Shin, Y., Lee, G. M., & Moon, I. (2018). Early stage response problem for post-disaster incidents. Engineering Optimization, 50(7), 1198-1211. doi:10.1080/0305215x.2017.1419345Klein, K. R., & Nagel, N. E. (2007). Mass Medical Evacuation: Hurricane Katrina and Nursing Experiences at the New Orleans Airport. Disaster Management & Response, 5(2), 56-61. doi:10.1016/j.dmr.2007.03.001Kovacs, G., & Moshtari, M. (2019). A roadmap for higher research quality in humanitarian operations: A methodological perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(2), 395-408. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.052Lee, E. K., Chen, C.-H., Pietz, F., & Benecke, B. (2009). Modeling and Optimizing the Public-Health Infrastructure for Emergency Response. Interfaces, 39(5), 476-490. doi:10.1287/inte.1090.0463Leiras, A., de Brito Jr, I., Queiroz Peres, E., Rejane Bertazzo, T., & Tsugunobu Yoshida Yoshizaki, H. (2014). Literature review of humanitarian logistics research: trends and challenges. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4(1), 95-130. doi:10.1108/jhlscm-04-2012-0008Lerner, E. B., Schwartz, R. B., Coule, P. L., Weinstein, E. S., Cone, D. C., Hunt, R. C., … O’Connor, R. E. (2008). Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2(S1), S25-S34. doi:10.1097/dmp.0b013e318182194eLi, D., & Glazebrook, K. D. (2010). An approximate dynamic programing approach to the development of heuristics for the scheduling of impatient jobs in a clearing system. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 57(3), 225-236. doi:10.1002/nav.20395Li, M.-Y., Zhao, X.-J., Fan, Z.-P., Cao, P.-P., & Qu, X.-N. (2019). A model for assignment of rescuers considering multiple disaster areas. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 38, 101201. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101201Li, Y., & Chung, S. H. (2018). Disaster relief routing under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach. IISE Transactions, 51(8), 869-886. doi:10.1080/24725854.2018.1450540Liu, Y., Cui, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Integrated temporary facility location and casualty allocation planning for post-disaster humanitarian medical service. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 128, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.008Liu, Y., Lei, H., Wu, Z., & Zhang, D. (2019). A robust model predictive control approach for post-disaster relief distribution. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 1253-1270. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.005Lodree, E. J., Altay, N., & Cook, R. A. (2017). Staff assignment policies for a mass casualty event queuing network. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1-2), 411-442. doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2635-8Mahootchi, M., & Golmohammadi, S. (2017). Developing a new stochastic model considering bi-directional relations in a natural disaster: a possible earthquake in Tehran (the Capital of Islamic Republic of Iran). Annals of Operations Research, 269(1-2), 439-473. doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2596-yMills, A. F. (2016). A simple yet effective decision support policy for mass-casualty triage. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(3), 734-745. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.005Mills, A. F., Argon, N. T., & Ziya, S. (2013). Resource-Based Patient Prioritization in Mass-Casualty Incidents. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(3), 361-377. doi:10.1287/msom.1120.0426Mills, A. F., Argon, N. T., & Ziya, S. (2018). Dynamic Distribution of Patients to Medical Facilities in the Aftermath of a Disaster. Operations Research, 66(3), 716-732. doi:10.1287/opre.2017.1695Mollah, A. K., Sadhukhan, S., Das, P., & Anis, M. Z. (2018). A cost optimization model and solutions for shelter allocation and relief distribution in flood scenario. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 1187-1198. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.018Na, H. S., & Banerjee, A. (2015). A disaster evacuation network model for transporting multiple priority evacuees. IIE Transactions, 47(11), 1287-1299. doi:10.1080/0740817x.2015.1040929Najafi, M., Eshghi, K., & de Leeuw, S. (2013). A dynamic dispatching and routing model to plan/ re-plan logistics activities in response to an earthquake. OR Spectrum, 36(2), 323-356. doi:10.1007/s00291-012-0317-0Najafi, M., Eshghi, K., & Dullaert, W. (2013). A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 49(1), 217-249. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2012.09.001Natarajarathinam, M., Capar, I., & Narayanan, A. (2009). Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(7), 535-573. doi:10.1108/09600030910996251New Madrid Seismic Zone: Catastrophic earthquake response planning project. (2009). Available atwww.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/14810/ImpactofNewMadridSeismicZoneEarthquakeso%20theCentral%20USAVol1.pdf.Ni, W., Shu, J., & Song, M. (2017). Location and Emergency Inventory Pre-Positioning for Disaster Response Operations: Min-Max Robust Model and a Case Study of Yushu Earthquake. Production and Operations Management, 27(1), 160-183. doi:10.1111/poms.12789Niessner, H., Rauner, M. S., & Gutjahr, W. J. (2018). A dynamic simulation–optimization approach for managing mass casualty incidents. Operations Research for Health Care, 17, 82-100. doi:10.1016/j.orhc.2017.07.001Nolz, P. C., Semet, F., & Doerner, K. F. (2011). Risk approaches for delivering disaster relief supplies. OR Spectrum, 33(3), 543-569. doi:10.1007/s00291-011-0258-zOverstreet, R. E., Hall, D., Hanna, J. B., & Kelly Rainer, R. (2011). Research in humanitarian logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(2), 114-131. doi:10.1108/204267411111584
    corecore