8 research outputs found

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Utility of molecular techniques applied to Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina diagnosis in cattle: Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT: Several microscopic, serological and molecular methods are available to diagnosis babesiosis; however, molecular techniques have gained special interest because they allow detection of genetic material at low concentrations, and sometimes it is possible to discriminate between species. OBJECTIVE To describe the utility of the main molecular techniques applied to diagnosis of infections by Babesia bovis and B. bigemina in cattle. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of literature published between 2006 and 2011 in Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Springer Link databases using MeSH terms: Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Western Blotting, Microarray Analysis, Cattle, Babesia and Babesia bovis. RESULTS A total of 299 papers were obtained, 28 of them were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Molecular techniques used were PCR and its variants and RLB, to a lesser extent LAMP and Western Blot were used. A brief description of each technique, its application in the diagnosis of infections by B. bovis and B. bigemina in cattle and some aspects to be consider for successful implementation were described; in addition, molecular markers, extraction methods of nucleic acids used and geographic discrimination in the use of the techniques were also described. CONCLUSIONS Molecular techniques have the ability to detect infections by B. bovis and B. bigemina with high specificity. In addition, they allow performing studies on the biology of these microorganisms, as well as epidemiological, phylogenetic and immunization studies. Key words: Babesia. Western Blotting. Cattle. Diagnostic techniques and procedures. Polimerase chain reaction.RESUMEN: Existen numerosos métodos microscópicos, serológicos y moleculares para el diagnóstico de la babesiosis; sin embargo, las técnicas moleculares han ganado especial interés porque permiten la detección del material genético en bajas concentraciones, y en ocasiones, la discriminación de especie. Objetivo. Describir la utilidad de las principales técnicas moleculares aplicadas al diagnóstico de infecciones por Babesia bovis y Babesia bigemina en bovinos. Materiales y Métodos. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura publicada entre 2006 y 2011 en las bases de datos PubMed, ScienceDirect y Springer Link empleando los términos MeSH: Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Blotting Western, Microarray Analysis, Cattle, Babesia y Babesia bovis. Resultados. Se obtuvieron 299 artículos relacionados, de los cuales fueron seleccionados 28 de acuerdo con los criterios de inclusión. Las técnicas moleculares más empleadas fueron la PCR y sus variantes y el RLB; en menor proporción se emplearon el LAMP y el Western Blot. Se describe brevemente cada técnica, sus aplicaciones en el diagnóstico de infecciones por B. bovis y B. bigemina en bovinos y algunos aspectos a considerar para su correcta aplicación; así mismo, se analiza el marcador molecular, el método de extracción de ácidos nucléicos empleado y la discriminación geográfica del uso de las técnicas. Conclusión. Las técnicas moleculares tienen la capacidad de detectar infecciones por B. bovis y B. bigemina con gran especificidad. Además, permite realizar estudios sobre la biología de los microorganismos, epidemiológicos, filogenéticos y de inmunización. Palabras clave: Babesia. Bovinos. Reacción en cadena de la polimerasa. Técnicas y procedimientos diagnósticos. Western Blotting

    Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive Care Medicine, (2021), 47, 2, (160-169), 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9)

    No full text
    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected
    corecore