25 research outputs found

    Protein arginine methyltransferases PRMT1, PRMT4/CARM1 and PRMT5 have distinct functions in control of osteoblast differentiation

    Get PDF
    Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells is controlled by epigenetic enzymes that regulate post-translational modifications of histones. Compared to acetyl or methyltransferases, the physiological functions of protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) in osteoblast differentiation remain minimally understood. Therefore, we surveyed the expression and function of all nine mammalian PRMT members during osteoblast differentiation. RNA-seq gene expression profiling shows that Prmt1, Prmt4/Carm1 and Prmt5 represent the most prominently expressed PRMT subtypes in mouse calvarial bone and MC3T3 osteoblasts as well as human musculoskeletal tissues and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Based on effects of siRNA depletion, it appears that PRMT members have different functional effects: (i) loss of Prmt1 stimulates and (ii) loss of Prmt5 decreases calcium deposition of mouse MC3T3 osteoblasts, while (iii) loss of Carm1 is inconsequential for calcium deposition. Decreased Prmt5 suppresses expression of multiple genes involved in mineralization (e.g., Alpl, Ibsp, Phospho1) consistent with a positive role in osteogenesis. Depletion of Prmt1, Carm1 and Prmt5 has intricate but modest time-dependent effects on the expression of a panel of osteoblast differentiation and proliferation markers but does not change mRNA levels for select epigenetic regulators (e.g., Ezh1, Ezh2, Brd2 and Brd4). Treatment with the Class I PRMT inhibitor GSK715 enhances extracellular matrix mineralization of MC3T3 cells, while blocking formation of H3R17me2a but not H4R3me2a marks. In sum, Prmt1, Carm1 and Prmt5 have distinct biological roles during osteoblast differentiation, and different types histone H3 and H4 arginine methylation may contribute to the chromatin landscape during osteoblast differentiation.</p

    Genetic diversity and demographic history of the leopard seal: A Southern Ocean top predator

    Get PDF
    Leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) are top predators that can exert substantial top-down control of their Antarctic prey species. However, population trends and genetic diversity of leopard seals remain understudied, limiting our understanding of their ecological role. We investigated the genetic diversity, effective population size and demographic history of leopard seals to provide fundamental data that contextualizes their predatory influence on Antarctic ecosystems. Ninety leopard seals were sampled from the northern Antarctic Peninsula during the austral summers of 2008–2019 and a 405bp segment of the mitochondrial control region was sequenced for each individual. We uncovered moderate levels of nucleotide (π = 0.013) and haplotype (Hd = 0.96) diversity, and the effective population size was estimated at around 24,000 individuals (NE = 24,376; 95% CI: 16,876–33,126). Consistent with findings from other ice-breeding pinnipeds, Bayesian skyline analysis also revealed evidence for population expansion during the last glacial maximum, suggesting that historical population growth may have been boosted by an increase in the abundance of sea ice. Although leopard seals can be found in warmer, sub-Antarctic locations, the species’ core habitat is centered on the Antarctic, making it inherently vulnerable to the loss of sea ice habitat due to climate change. Therefore, detailed assessments of past and present leopard seal population trends are needed to inform policies for Antarctic ecosystems

    Molecular systematics of flyingfishes (Teleostei: Exocoetidae): evolution in the epipelagic zone

    Full text link
    The flyingfish family Exocoetidae is a diverse group of marine fishes that are widespread and abundant in tropical and subtropical seas. Flyingfishes are epipelagic specialists that are easily distinguished by their enlarged fins, which are used for gliding leaps over the surface of the water. Although phylogenetic hypotheses have been proposed for flyingfish genera based on morphology, no comprehensive molecular studies have been performed. In the present study, we describe a species-level molecular phylogeny for the family Exocoetidae, based on data from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (1137 bp) and the nuclear RAG2 gene (882 bp). We find strong support for previous morphology-based phylogenetic hypotheses, as well as the monophyly of most currently accepted flyingfish genera. However, the most diverse genus Cheilopogon is not monophyletic. Using our novel flyingfish topology, we examine previously proposed hypotheses for the origin and evolution of gliding. The results support the progressive transition from two-wing to four-wing gliding. We also use phylogenetic approaches to test the macroecological effects of two life history characters (e.g. egg buoyancy and habitat) on species range size in flyingfishes. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2011, 102, 161–174.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79173/1/BIJ_1550_sm_Appendix_S1.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79173/2/j.1095-8312.2010.01550.x.pd

    Epigenetic regulators controlling osteogenic lineage commitment and bone formation

    Get PDF
    Bone formation and homeostasis are controlled by environmental factors and endocrine regulatory cues that initiate intracellular signaling pathways capable of modulating gene expression in the nucleus. Bone-related gene expression is controlled by nucleosome-based chromatin architecture that limits the accessibility of lineage-specific gene regulatory DNA sequences and sequence-specific transcription factors. From a developmental perspective, bone-specific gene expression must be suppressed during the early stages of embryogenesis to prevent the premature mineralization of skeletal elements during fetal growth in utero. Hence, bone formation is initially inhibited by gene suppressive epigenetic regulators, while other epigenetic regulators actively support osteoblast differentiation. Prominent epigenetic regulators that stimulate or attenuate osteogenesis include lysine methyl transferases (e.g., EZH2, SMYD2, SUV420H2), lysine deacetylases (e.g., HDAC1, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC7, SIRT1, SIRT3), arginine methyl transferases (e.g., PRMT1, PRMT4/CARM1, PRMT5), dioxygenases (e.g., TET2), bromodomain proteins (e.g., BRD2, BRD4) and chromodomain proteins (e.g., CBX1, CBX2, CBX5). This narrative review provides a broad overview of the covalent modifications of DNA and histone proteins that involve hundreds of enzymes that add, read, or delete these epigenetic modifications that are relevant for self-renewal and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, skeletal stem cells and osteoblasts during osteogenesis.</p

    Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for cytochrome b sequence data between putative populations of <i>Exocoetus volitans</i>.

    Get PDF
    <p>Collection localities, numbers of individuals (n), putative dispersal barriers, Φ<sub>ST</sub> values, and p-values are listed. Significant results are highlighted in bold and any negative Φ<sub>ST</sub> values were set to zero.</p

    Population Genetic Structure of the Tropical Two-Wing Flyingfish (<i>Exocoetus volitans</i>)

    No full text
    <div><p>Delineating populations of pantropical marine fish is a difficult process, due to widespread geographic ranges and complex life history traits in most species. <i>Exocoetus volitans</i>, a species of two-winged flyingfish, is a good model for understanding large-scale patterns of epipelagic fish population structure because it has a circumtropical geographic range and completes its entire life cycle in the epipelagic zone. Buoyant pelagic eggs should dictate high local dispersal capacity in this species, although a brief larval phase, small body size, and short lifespan may limit the dispersal of individuals over large spatial scales. Based on these biological features, we hypothesized that <i>E</i>. <i>volitans</i> would exhibit statistically and biologically significant population structure defined by recognized oceanographic barriers. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing cytochrome b mtDNA sequence data (1106 bps) from specimens collected in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans (n = 266). AMOVA, Bayesian, and coalescent analytical approaches were used to assess and interpret population-level genetic variability. A parsimony-based haplotype network did not reveal population subdivision among ocean basins, but AMOVA revealed limited, statistically significant population structure between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Φ<sub>ST</sub> = 0.035, p<0.001). A spatially-unbiased Bayesian approach identified two circumtropical population clusters north and south of the Equator (Φ<sub>ST</sub> = 0.026, p<0.001), a previously unknown dispersal barrier for an epipelagic fish. Bayesian demographic modeling suggested the effective population size of this species increased by at least an order of magnitude ~150,000 years ago, to more than 1 billion individuals currently. Thus, high levels of genetic similarity observed in <i>E</i>. <i>volitans</i> can be explained by high rates of gene flow, a dramatic and recent population expansion, as well as extensive and consistent dispersal throughout the geographic range of the species.</p></div

    Cytochrome b gene haplotype network.

    No full text
    <p>This figure was obtained using statistical parsimony analysis within TCS, v.1.21 [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163198#pone.0163198.ref013" target="_blank">13</a>]. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of shared haplotypes. Lines connecting circles represent single mutations. Blue circles = Atlantic Ocean, Red circles = Pacific Ocean, and Green circles = Indian Ocean. The square in the center represents the ancestral haplotype shared by samples from all three oceans. Open circles represent un-sampled haplotypes.</p

    Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for cytochrome b sequence data between putative populations of <i>Exocoetus volitans</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Collection localities, numbers of individuals (n), putative dispersal barriers, Φ<sub>ST</sub> values, and p-values are listed. Significant results are highlighted in bold and any negative Φ<sub>ST</sub> values were set to zero.</p

    Comparison of Φ<sub>ST</sub> values from population genetic studies involving widely distributed marine teleosts including <i>Exocoetus volitans</i> (results of present study in bold), and two other flyingfish species (<i>Hirundichthys affinis</i>, and <i>H</i>. <i>oxycephalus</i>) for which a Φ<sub>ST</sub> estimates are available.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of Φ<sub>ST</sub> values from population genetic studies involving widely distributed marine teleosts including <i>Exocoetus volitans</i> (results of present study in bold), and two other flyingfish species (<i>Hirundichthys affinis</i>, and <i>H</i>. <i>oxycephalus</i>) for which a Φ<sub>ST</sub> estimates are available.</p
    corecore