257 research outputs found
Blending PEG-based polymers and their use in surface micro-patterning by the FIMIC method to obtain topographically smooth patterns of elasticity
Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugÀnglich.This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.We have designed and fabricated a library of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based polymer blends, including blends of two PEG-based polymers that are liquid at room temperature where the optimisation of the blending method allows for the incorporation of higher molecular-weight PEG-based polymers which are solid at room temperature. The absence of a solvent in these blends makes them perfect candidates for use in our recently developed Fill-Molding in Capillaries (FIMIC) patterning method. As our FIMIC samples have shown to be not completely smooth (a small topography up to several nanometers has been seen previously), and this is likely to affect the cellular behaviour, we have improved our technique in order to obtain virtually smooth samples that exhibit a pattern of elasticity only. It is demonstrated that, by taking advantage of the differential swelling of the pattern components, we can level out the undesired topographic difference. In particular, by employing blends of materials, (1) the swelling degree of each component can be fine-tuned to even out any topography and (2) the use of the same blends in the sample, yet with varying cross-linker amounts, ensures the swelling degree and elasticity change without changing the surface chemistry significantly. Genuine, binary patterns of elasticity can thus be fabricated, which are a great asset to study cell migration phenomena in systematic detail.DFG, EXC 314, Unifying Concepts in Catalysi
What do women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) understand about their chance of IVF success?
Funding No external funding was used for this study. S.L. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP1195189). R.W. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (GNT2009767). B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (GNT1176437) and has received research funding and travel funding from MerckPeer reviewedPublisher PD
VALUE study : a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia
Funding This research was funded by an Obstetrics and Gynaecology Innovation Grant from the University of Melbourne Australia. MP is supported by a University of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology MCR Fellowship. Acknowledgements Our heartfelt thanks to our PPI panel who gave up their time to contribute to the development of VALUE. UK: Isabella Dash, Jennifer Nisbett, Hannah Reid, Ally Richardson, Victoria Thomas, Bassel Wattar. Australia: Katherine Gobbi, Hilary Smith, Natasha Devetak, Alex Polyakov, Anna Ninnis, Lisa Lee, Vadim Mirmilstein.Peer reviewedPublisher PD
Why are feasibility studies accessing routinely collected health data? A systematic review
BACKGROUND:
Feasibility trials are often undertaken to determine whether a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT) is achievable. In a recent review, 15 feasibility trials accessed routinely collected health data (RCHD) from UK national databases and registries. This paper looks at attributes of these trials and the reasons why they accessed RCHD.
METHODS:
We extracted data from all publicly available sources for the 15 feasibility studies found in a previous review of trials successfully accessing RCHD in the UK between 2013â2018 for the purpose of informing or supplementing participant data. We extracted trial characteristics, the registry accessed, and the way the RCHD was used.
RESULTS:
The 15 feasibility RCTs were conducted in a variety of disease areas, and were generally small (median sample size 100, range 41â4061) and individually randomised (60%, 9/15). The primary trial outcome was predominantly administrative (non-clinical) (80%, 12/15) such as feasibility of patient recruitment. They were more likely to recruit from secondary care (67%, 10/15) settings than primary (33%, 5/15).
NHS Digital was the most commonly accessed registry (33% (5/15)) with SAIL databank (20% (3/15)), electronic Data Research and Innovation Service (eDRIS) and Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANET) (each 13% 2/15) also being accessed. Where the information was clear, the trials used RCHD for data collection during the trial (47%, 7/15), follow-up after the trial (27%, 4/15) and recruitment (13%, 2/15).
CONCLUSIONS:
Between 2013 and 2018, 15 feasibility trials successfully accessed UK RCHD. Feasibility trials would benefit, as with other trials, from guidance on reporting the use of RCHD in protocols and publications
Synthesis and self-assembly of giant porphyrin discs
Contains fulltext :
13852.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
Patient and professional perspectives about using in vitro fertilisation add-ons in the UK and Australia: a qualitative study
Objectives In vitro fertilisation (IVF) add-ons are additional procedures offered alongside an IVF cycle with the aim of improving live birth rates. They are controversial because of the paucity of evidence to support their efficacy and safety, alongside the additional financial cost they often pose to patients. Despite this, they are popular. However, there is limited qualitative research regarding their use. The aims of the VALUE Study were to understand the decision-making process surrounding using or recommending add-ons; report sources of information for add-ons; and explore concerns for safety and effectiveness when considering their use.
Design âVALUEâ is a qualitative semistructured interview study using inductive thematic analysis of anonymised transcriptions.
Setting Participants were recruited from a broad geographical spread across the UK and Australia from public and private clinical settings.
Participants Patients (n=25) and health professionals (embryologists (n=25) and clinicians (n=24)) were interviewed. A purposive sampling strategy was undertaken. The sampling framework included people having state-subsidised and private cycles, professionals working in public and private sectors, geographical location and professionals of all grades.
Results Patients often made decisions about add-ons based on hope, minimising considerations of safety, efficacy or cost, whereas professionals sought the best outcomes for their patients and wanted to avoid them wasting their money. The driving forces behind add-on use differed: for patients, a professional opinion was the most influential reason, whereas for professionals, it was seen as patient driven. For both groups, applying the available evidence to individual circumstances was very challenging, especially in the sphere of IVF medicine, where the stakes are high.
Conclusions There is scope to build on the quality of the discourse between patients and professionals. Patients describe valuing their autonomy with add-ons, but for professionals, undertaking informed consent will be critical, no matter where they sit on the spectrum regarding add-ons
Can Genetic Programming Do Manifold Learning Too?
Exploratory data analysis is a fundamental aspect of knowledge discovery that
aims to find the main characteristics of a dataset. Dimensionality reduction,
such as manifold learning, is often used to reduce the number of features in a
dataset to a manageable level for human interpretation. Despite this, most
manifold learning techniques do not explain anything about the original
features nor the true characteristics of a dataset. In this paper, we propose a
genetic programming approach to manifold learning called GP-MaL which evolves
functional mappings from a high-dimensional space to a lower dimensional space
through the use of interpretable trees. We show that GP-MaL is competitive with
existing manifold learning algorithms, while producing models that can be
interpreted and re-used on unseen data. A number of promising future directions
of research are found in the process.Comment: 16 pages, accepted in EuroGP '1
Endometrial scratching in women undergoing IVF/ICSI : an individual participant data meta-analysis
Funding No specific funding was sought for this project. The sponsor of this project is the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, the Netherlands. The sponsor was not involved in the study design, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD
The efficacy of suppressive antibiotic treatment in patients managed non-operatively for periprosthetic joint infection and a draining sinus
Objectives: Patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) not suitable for curative surgery may benefit from suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). However, the usefulness of SAT in cases with a draining sinus has never been investigated. Methods: A multicentre, retrospective observational cohort study was performed in which patients with a PJI and a sinus tract were eligible for inclusion if managed conservatively and if sufficient follow-up data were available (i.e. at least 2 years). SAT was defined as a period of > 6 months of oral antibiotic therapy. Results: SAT was initiated in 63 of 72 (87.5 %) included patients. Implant retention during follow-up was the same in patients receiving SAT vs. no SAT (79.4 % vs. 88.9 %; pCombining double low line0.68). In total, 27 % of patients using SAT experienced side effects. In addition, the occurrence of prosthetic loosening in initially fixed implants, the need for surgical debridement, or the occurrence of bacteremia during follow-up could not be fully prevented with the use of SAT, which still occurred in 42 %, 6.3 %, and 3.2 % of cases, respectively. However, the sinus tract tended to close more often (42 % vs. 13 %; pCombining double low line0.14), and a higher resolution of pain was observed (35 % vs. 14 %; pCombining double low line0.22) in patients receiving SAT. Conclusions: SAT is not able to fully prevent complications in patients with a draining sinus. However, it may be beneficial in a subset of patients, particularly in those with pain or the hindrance of a draining sinus. A future prospective study, including a higher number of patients not receiving SAT, is needed
Technique of anterior colporrhaphy: a Dutch evaluation
Contains fulltext :
96395.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the variation in techniques of anterior colporrhaphy among members of the Dutch Urogynecologic Society. METHODS: A questionnaire evaluating the technique of anterior colporrhaphy, preoperative and postoperative care, and use of the POP-Q score was sent out by e-mail. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three completed questionnaires were received. The response rate was 65%. There are large variations in incisions, use of hydrodissection, method of plication, and excision of redundant vaginal epithelium. The urinary catheter was generally removed on day 2 after surgery and the vaginal pack on day 1. Less than half of the respondents used the POP-Q score routinely. CONCLUSIONS: Dutch gynecologists use a variety of surgical techniques to operate on a cystocele. This suggests that there is no widely accepted opinion on the best surgical approach. The lack of differentiation between central and lateral defects is striking and in contrast with the, mostly, American literature
- âŠ