Treatment and survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: 15-year national cohort

Background - Improvement in survival from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reported in trial settings but is less explored in unselected cohorts. The aim of this study was to assess trends in provision of treatments and survival in Norway over a 15-year period following the implementation of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) multidisciplinary teams, centralization of surgery, and implementation of modern chemotherapy (CTx) regimens. Methods - A population-based observational study was conducted by analysing all patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2018 using coupled data from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the National Patient Registry. Results - A total of 10 630 patients were identified, of whom 1492 (14.0 per cent) underwent surgical resection. The resection rate, median age of those resected, and provision of perioperative CTx all increased over time. Median overall survival after resection improved from 16.0 months in the period 2004 to 2008 to 25.1 months in the period 2014 to 2018 (P  Conclusion - Survival after resection increased substantially, as did national resection rates. Little development in the provision of CTx or survival was observed for non-resected patients

Gastro- or Duodenojejunostomy Leaks After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Single Center Experience and Narrative Literature Review

Background and Methods - Gastro- or duodenojejunostomy leaks after pancreatoduodenectomy is rare. This study aims to analyze the incidence, management, and outcome of gastro- or duodenojejunostomy leaks after pancreatoduodenectomy based on a single center experience from 2004 to 2020 with a narrative literature review. Results - Of a total of 1494 pancreatoduodenectomies, eight patients with gastrojejunostomy (n=1) or duodenojejunostomy (n=7) leak were identified from the institutional pancreatic database. All leaks were treated operatively. In two patients dismantling of the duodenojejunostomy, distal gastrectomy, and closure of the pyloric and jejunal side, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and a feeding jejunostomy ultimately had to be performed after an unsuccessful attempt of gastrojejunostomy and suture of the duodenojejunostomy, respectively. The literature search revealed three more studies specifically addressing this complication after pancreatoduodenectomy (36 patients of a total of 4739 pancreatoduodenectomies). Based on an analysis of the current study and the literature review, the overall incidence of gastro- or duodenojejunostomy leaks after pancreatoduodenectomy was 0.71 % (44/6233 pancreatoduodenectomies). The occurrence of a gastro- or duodenojejunostomy leak was associated with a concomitant postoperative pancreatic fistula in 50 % of the cases, an increased length of hospital stay, and a mortality rate of 15.9 %. Surgical treatment was performed in 84 % of the cases. Conclusion - Gastro- or duodenojejunostomy leak is a rare complication after pancreatoduodenectomy. Prompt diagnosis and early repair is important. In most cases, a surgical intervention is necessary for a good outcome. Under salvage conditions, a bailout strategy may be to temporarily dismantle the gastro- or duodenojejunal anastomosis

Biliary Adenofibroma: A Rare Liver Tumor with Transition to Invasive Carcinoma

Biliary adenofibroma is a rare benign liver tumor with potential for malignant transition. It has a bile duct origin characterized by a complex tubulocystic biliary epithelium with fibrous stroma. MRI features may suggest this uncommon entity, and histological findings can be diagnostic. We report a case of biliary adenofibroma with transformation to an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The clinical application of longitudinal layer specific strain as a diagnostic and prognostic instrument in ischemic heart diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background2-dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography, to obtain longitudinal layer specific strain (LSS), has recently emerged as a novel and accurate non-invasive imaging technique for diagnosis as well as for prediction of adverse cardiac events. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to give an overview of the possible clinical implication and significance of longitudinal LSS.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with all the studies involving layer specific strain in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Of 40 eligible studies, 9 met our inclusion criteria. Studies that were included either investigated the prognostic value (n = 3) or the diagnostic value (n = 6) of longitudinal LSS.ResultsThe pooled meta-analysis showed that longitudinal LSS is a significant diagnostic marker for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with IHD. Endocardial LSS was found to be a good diagnostic marker for CAD in IHD patients (OR: 1.28, CI95% [1.11–1.48], p < 0.001, per 1% decrease). Epicardial (OR: 1.34, CI95% [1.14–1.56], p < 0.001, per 1% decrease), Mid-Myocardial (OR: 1.24, CI95% [1.12–1.38], p < 0.001, per 1% decrease) and endocardial (OR: 1.21, CI95% [1.09–1.35], p < 0.001, per 1% decrease) LSS all entailed diagnostic information regarding CAD, with epicardial LSS emerging as the superior diagnostic marker for CAD in patients with SAP. Endocardial LSS proved to be the better diagnostic marker of CAD in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). LSS was shown to be a good prognostic maker of adverse cardiac events in IHD patients. Two studies found endocardial circumferential strain to be the good predictor of outcome in CAD patients and when added to baseline characteristics. Epicardial LSS emerged as best predictor in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.ConclusionIn patients with SAP, epicardial LSS was the stronger diagnostic marker while in NSTE-ACS patients, endocardial LSS was the stronger diagnostic marker. In addition, endocardial circumferential strain is the better predictor of adverse outcome in CAD patients whilst in ACS patients, epicardial LSS was found to be a better predictor of outcome

Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A National Registry-Based Study

Background Preoperative inflammatory markers were shown to be associated with prognosis following surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer. Yet little evidence exists about their role in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to examine the association between selected preoperative inflammatory markers and outcomes of liver resection for CRLM. Methods Data from the Norwegian National Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NORGAST) was used to capture all liver resections performed in Norway within the study period (November 2015–April 2021). Preoperative inflammatory markers were Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR). The impact of these on postoperative outcomes, as well as on survival were studied. Results Liver resections for CRLM were performed in 1442 patients. Preoperative GPS C 1 and mGPS C 1 were present in 170 (11.8%) and 147 (10.2%) patients, respectively. Both were associated with severe complications but became non-significant in the multivariable model. GPS, mGPS, CAR were significant predictors for overall survival in the univariable analysis, but only CAR remained such in the multivariable model. When stratified by the type of surgical approach, CAR was a significant predictor for survival after open but not laparoscopic liver resections. Conclusions GPS, mGPS and CAR have no impact on severe complications after liver resection for CRLM. CAR outperforms GPS and mGPS in predicting overall survival in these patients, especially following open resections. The prognostic significance of CAR in CRLM should be tested against other clinical and pathology parameters relevant for prognosis

Secondary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical management of hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies in the Nordic capitals

Non peer reviewe

The Role of Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Pancreatectomy: a Norwegian Nationwide Cohort Study

Background and purpose Preoperative infammatory markers, such as Glasgow prognostic score, modifed Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, were shown to be associated with prognosis in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer. However, little is known about their predictive role in a Western population. Methods The Norwegian National Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NORGAST) was used to capture all pancreatectomies performed within the study period (November 2015—April 2021). The association between the preoperative infammatory markers and postoperative outcomes was studied. Their impact on survival was examined in patients operated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Results A total of 1554 patients underwent pancreatectomy in this period. Glasgow prognostic score, modifed Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were associated with severe complications (Accordion grade≥III) in the univariable but not in the multivariable analysis. C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, but not Glasgow prognostic score and modifed Glasgow prognostic score, was linked to survival following pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. In the multivariable model, age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ECOG score, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and total pancreatectomy correlated with survival. Also, preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio was signifcantly associated with survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. Conclusions Preoperative Glasgow prognostic score, modifed Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio have no role in predicting the complications after pancreatectomy. C-reactive protein to albumin ratio is a signifcant predictor for survival in ductal adenocarcinoma, yet its clinical relevance should be explored in conjunction with the pathology parameters and adjuvant therapy

Centralizing a national pancreatoduodenectomy service: striking the right balance

Background - Centralization of pancreatic surgery is currently called for owing to superior outcomes in higher‐volume centres. Conversely, organizational and patient concerns speak for a moderation in centralization. Consensus on the optimal balance has not yet been reached. This observational study presents a volume–outcome analysis of a complete national cohort in a health system with long‐standing centralization. Methods - Data for all pancreatoduodenectomies in Norway in 2015 and 2016 were identified through a national quality registry and completed through electronic patient journals. Hospitals were dichotomized (high‐volume (40 or more procedures/year) or medium–low‐volume). Results - Some 394 procedures were performed (201 in high‐volume and 193 in medium–low‐volume units). Major postoperative complications occurred in 125 patients (31·7 per cent). A clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 66 patients (16·8 per cent). Some 17 patients (4·3 per cent) died within 90 days, and the failure‐to‐rescue rate was 13·6 per cent (17 of 125 patients). In multivariable comparison with the high‐volume centre, medium–low‐volume units had similar overall complication rates, lower 90‐day mortality (odds ratio 0·24, 95 per cent c.i. 0·07 to 0·82) and no tendency for a higher failure‐to‐rescue rate. Conclusion - Centralization beyond medium volume will probably not improve on 90‐day mortality or failure‐to‐rescue rates after pancreatoduodenectomy