L'exemple de l'Ontario

Dans son processus visant à évaluer la pertinence d'une éventuelle Cour suprême du Québec, le législateur québécois peut s'inspirer de différents modèles et de diverses expériences, dans l'ensemble du monde occidental. Cependant, l'exemple le plus près de notre réalité s'avère sans aucun doute celui de l'Ontario, province aux prises avec le même type de problèmes que le Québec.In its efforts to assess the relevance of a possible Québec Supreme Court, the Québec legislator may receive inspiration from various models and experiences taken from western nations. Nonetheless, the closest example to our reality is doubtlessly that of Ontario, a province having to cope with the same problems as does Québec

L'étude de la culture : le folklore

Commentair

Les transformations d'une chanson folklorique : du Moine Tremblant au Rapide-Blanc

L’enquête ethnographique et folklorique a été 1' une des premières aussi bien que 1'une des plus consciencieuses et des plus systématiques manifestations de la recherche scientifique sur notre milieu. Les formes spontanées de la vie populaire traditionnelle : coutumes, dictons, légendes, contes, chansons, ont été l'objet de répertoires, d'inventaires, de monographies originales dont 1'ensemble constitue un trésor documentaire d'une richesse trop peu connue. L’initiative et le mérite de ces travaux reviennent en très grande partie, depuis vingt ans, à l'Institut de Folklore et aux Archives de Folklore de l'Université Laval et à leur directeur, M. Luc Lacourcière. Dans l'étude qui suit, M. Lacourcière récapitule les avatars' d’une chanson populaire qui a connu récemment une étonnante faveur publique. Sa patiente analyse folklorique décèle, par le recours à l'histoire et à la sémantique, la mystérieuse richesse des apports humains successifs dans 1' élaboration d'un phénomène social apparemment aussi banal qu’une simple chanson

Dissidence : pour une nouvelle génération de résistance

Je m’intéresse aux femmes et à la résistance qu’elles imposent aux conditionnements en matière de beauté qui leur sont infligés par la société occidentale. Dissidence est le résultat de deux années de recherches et créations portant sur l’exploration de cette forme résistance. La dissidence est l’action ou l’état d’une personne qui cesse d’obéir à une communauté, à une autorité établie. Ce type de refus existe chez les femmes en regard aux normes imposées par les diverses industries gérant le domaine de la mode. C’est d’ailleurs autour de ces notions que je définis ma démarche artistique et mon corpus de dessins

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the SMOOTH study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Study of Micardis (telmisartan) in Overweight/Obese patients with Type 2 diabetes and Hypertension (SMOOTH) compared hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) plus telmisartan or valsartan fixed-dose combination therapies on early morning blood pressure (BP), using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>SMOOTH was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multicentre trial. After a 2- to 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients received once-daily telmisartan 80 mg or valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks, with add-on HCTZ 12.5 mg for 6 weeks (T/HCTZ or V/HCTZ, respectively). At baseline and week 10, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was measured every 20 min and hourly means were calculated. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP; DBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In total, 840 patients were randomized. At week 10, T/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions versus V/HCTZ in the last 6 hours mean ABP (differences in favour of T/HCTZ: SBP 3.9 mm Hg, p < 0.0001; DBP 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.0007). T/HCTZ also produced significantly greater reductions than V/HCTZ in 24-hour mean ABP (differences in favour of T/HCTZ: SBP 3.0 mm Hg, p = 0.0002; DBP 1.6 mm Hg, p = 0.0006) and during the morning, daytime and night-time periods (p < 0.003). Both treatments were well tolerated.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In high-risk, overweight/obese patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes, T/HCTZ provides significantly greater BP lowering versus V/HCTZ throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, particularly during the hazardous early morning hours.</p

Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy

Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy.BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to compare the effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker, losartan, to those of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, on albuminuria and renal function in relationship to clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects with early nephropathy. The tolerability of these agents and their effect on the metabolic profile were also evaluated.MethodsThe study was a one-year prospective, double-blind trial with losartan and enalapril administered alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide and other antihypertensive agents. ABP and renal and biochemical parameters were measured at baseline and after 12, 28, and 52 weeks of active treatment. Ninety-two hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy completed the study.ResultsBoth losartan and enalapril administered alone or in combination with other agents induced significant reductions in sitting clinic (P < 0.05) and ABP (P < 0.002) without a statistical difference between groups. Geometric means for urinary albumin excretion (UAE) decreased significantly (P < 0.001) in patients treated with losartan from 64.1 to 41.5 μg/min and in those treated with enalapril from 73.9 to 33.5 μg/min after 52 weeks of therapy. A significant relationship (P < 0.05) between changes in systolic and diastolic ABP and the decrease in UAE at 52 weeks was seen in both groups. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was stabilized at the end of therapy and was identical in both treatment groups. Treatment with enalapril was associated with a significantly higher incidence of cough (P = 0.006) and a rise in serum uric acid (P = 0.002) compared with losartan.ConclusionsOur results indicate that a one-year course of antihypertensive therapy with either losartan or enalapril significantly reduces UAE in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with early nephropathy. The reduction in UAE with each treatment is similarly related to decrements in ABP. In addition, the rate of decline in GFR is similar in both treatment groups

24-Hour ambulatory blood pressure control with triple-therapy amlodipine, valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate to severe hypertension

To determine the effectiveness and safety of once-daily combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide for reducing ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in patients with moderate to severe hypertension, a multicenter, double-blind study was performed (N=2271) that included ABP monitoring in a 283-patient subset. After a single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (10/320/25 mg), valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (320/25 mg), amlodipine/valsartan (10/320 mg) or amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide (10/25 mg) each morning for 8 weeks. Efficacy assessments included change from baseline in 24-h, daytime and night time mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions from baseline in all these parameters occurred in all treatment groups (P<0.0001, all comparisons versus baseline). At week 8, least squares mean reductions from baseline in 24-h, daytime and night time mean ambulatory SBP/DBP were 30.3/19.7, 31.2/20.5 and 28.0/17.8 mm Hg, respectively, with amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide; corresponding reductions with dual therapies ranged from 18.8–24.1/11.7–15.5, 19.0–25.1/12.0–16.0 and 18.3–22.6/11.1–14.3 mm Hg (P⩽0.01, all comparisons of triple versus dual therapy). Treatment with amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide maintained full 24-h effectiveness, including during the morning hours; all hourly mean ambulatory SBP and mean ambulatory DBP measurements were ⩽130/85 mm Hg at end point. Amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy was well tolerated. Once-daily treatment with amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (10/320/25 mg) reduces ABP to a significantly greater extent than component-based dual therapy and maintains its effectiveness over the entire 24-h dosing period

Effectiveness of initiating treatment with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with stage-1 or stage-2 hypertension

This prospective, 6-week, multicenter, double-blind study examined the benefits of initiating treatment with combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) compared with initial valsartan monotherapy for 648 patients with stage-1 or stage-2 hypertension (age=52.6±10 years; 54% male; baseline blood pressure (BP)=161/98 mm Hg, 32% stage 1). Patients were randomized to valsartan 80 mg (V-low), valsartan 160 mg (V-high) or valsartan/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg (V/HCTZ), and electively titrated after weeks 2 and 4 to the next dosage level (maximum dose valsartan/HCTZ 160/25 mg) if BP remained >140/90 mm Hg. At end of the study, patients initiated with V/HCTZ required less titration steps compared with the initial valsartan monotherapy groups (63 vs 86% required titration by study end, respectively) and reached the target BP goal of <140/90 mm Hg in a shorter period of time (2.8 weeks) (P<0.0001) vs V-low (4.3 weeks) and V-high (3.9 weeks). Initial combination therapy was also associated with higher BP control rates and greater reductions in both systolic and diastolic BP from baseline (63%, −27.7±13/–15.1±8 mm Hg) compared with V-low (46%, −21.2±13/−11.4±8 mm Hg, P<0.0001) or V-high (51%, −24.0±13/−12.0±10 mm Hg, P<0.01). Overall and drug-related AEs were mild to moderate and were similar between V/HCTZ (53.1 and 14.1%, respectively) and the two monotherapy groups, V-low (50.5 and 13.8%) and V-high (50.7 and 11.8%). In conclusion, initiating therapy with a combination of valsartan and low-dose HCTZ results in early, improved BP efficacy with similar tolerability as compared with starting treatment with a low or higher dose of valsartan for patients with stage-1 and stage-2 hypertension