Evidence for a role of NTS2 receptors in the modulation of tonic pain sensitivity

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Central neurotensin (NT) administration results in a naloxone-insensitive antinociceptive response in animal models of acute and persistent pain. Both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors were shown to be required for different aspects of NT-induced analgesia. We recently demonstrated that NTS2 receptors were extensively associated with ascending nociceptive pathways, both at the level of the dorsal root ganglia and of the spinal dorsal horn. Then, we found that spinally administered NTS2-selective agonists induced dose-dependent antinociceptive responses in the acute tail-flick test. In the present study, we therefore investigated whether activation of spinal NTS2 receptors suppressed the persistent inflammatory pain symptoms observed after intraplantar injection of formalin.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We first demonstrated that spinally administered NT and NT69L agonists, which bind to both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors, significantly reduced pain-evoked responses during the inflammatory phase of the formalin test. Accordingly, pretreatment with the NTS2-selective analogs JMV-431 and levocabastine was effective in inhibiting the aversive behaviors induced by formalin. With resolution at the single-cell level, we also found that activation of spinal NTS2 receptors reduced formalin-induced <it>c-fos </it>expression in dorsal horn neurons. However, our results also suggest that NTS2-selective agonists and NTS1/NTS2 mixed compounds differently modulated the early (21–39 min) and late (40–60 min) tonic phase 2 and recruited endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms integrated at different levels of the central nervous system. Indeed, while non-selective drugs suppressed pain-related behaviors activity in both part of phase 2, intrathecal injection of NTS2-selective agonists was only efficient in reducing pain during the late phase 2. Furthermore, assessment of the stereotypic pain behaviors of lifting, shaking, licking and biting to formalin also revealed that unlike non-discriminative NTS1/NTS2 analogs reversing all nociceptive endpoint behaviors, pure NTS2 agonists specifically inhibited paw lifting, supporting a role of NTS2 in spinal modulation of persistent nociception.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The present study provides the first demonstration that activation of NTS2 receptors produces analgesia in the persistent inflammatory pain model of formalin. The dichotomy between these two classes of compounds also indicates that both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors are involved in tonic pain inhibition and implies that these two NT receptors modulate the pain-induced behavioral responses by acting on distinct spinal and/or supraspinal neural circuits. In conclusion, development of NT agonists targeting both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors could be useful for chronic pain management.</p

Microscale thermophoresis quantifies biomolecular interactions under previously challenging conditions

Item does not contain fulltextMicroscale thermophoresis (MST) allows for quantitative analysis of protein interactions in free solution and with low sample consumption. The technique is based on thermophoresis, the directed motion of molecules in temperature gradients. Thermophoresis is highly sensitive to all types of binding-induced changes of molecular properties, be it in size, charge, hydration shell or conformation. In an all-optical approach, an infrared laser is used for local heating, and molecule mobility in the temperature gradient is analyzed via fluorescence. In standard MST one binding partner is fluorescently labeled. However, MST can also be performed label-free by exploiting intrinsic protein UV-fluorescence. Despite the high molecular weight ratio, the interaction of small molecules and peptides with proteins is readily accessible by MST. Furthermore, MST assays are highly adaptable to fit to the diverse requirements of different biomolecules, such as membrane proteins to be stabilized in solution. The type of buffer and additives can be chosen freely. Measuring is even possible in complex bioliquids like cell lysate allowing close to in vivo conditions without sample purification. Binding modes that are quantifiable via MST include dimerization, cooperativity and competition. Thus, its flexibility in assay design qualifies MST for analysis of biomolecular interactions in complex experimental settings, which we herein demonstrate by addressing typically challenging types of binding events from various fields of life science

Agonist and antagonist modulation of [(35)S]-GTPγS binding in transfected CHO cells expressing the neurotensin receptor

1. The functional interaction of the cloned rat neurotensin receptor with intracellular G-proteins was investigated by studying the binding of the radiolabelled guanylyl nucleotide analogue [(35)S]-GTPγS induced by neurotensin to membranes prepared from transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. 2. The agonist-induced binding of [(35)S]-GTPγS was only detected in the presence of NaCl in the incubation buffer. However, it was also demonstrated that the binding of [(3)H]-neurotensin to its receptor was inhibited by NaCl. In the presence of 50 mM NaCl, the binding of the labelled nucleotide was about 2 fold increased by stimulation with saturating concentrations of neurotensin (EC(50) value of 2.3±0.9 nM). 3. The stimulation of [(35)S]-GTPγS binding by neurotensin was mimicked by the stable analogue of neurotensin, JMV-449 (EC(50) value of 1.7±0.4 nM) and the neurotensin related peptide neuromedin N (EC(50) value of 21±6 nM). 4. The NT-induced [(35)S]-GTPγS binding was competitively inhibited by SR48692 (pA(2) value of 9.55±0.28), a non-peptide neurotensin receptor antagonist. SR48692 alone had no effect on the specific binding of [(35)S]-GTPγS. 5. The response to neurotensin was found to be inhibited by the aminosteroid U-73122, a putative inhibitor of phospholipase C-dependent processes, indicating that this drug may act at the G-protein level. 6. Taken together, these results constitute the first characterization of the exchange of guanylyl nucleotides at the G-protein level that is induced by the neuropeptide neurotensin after binding to its receptor