Student teamwork: developing virtual support for team projects

In the 21st century team working increasingly requires online cooperative skills as well as more traditional skills associated with face to face team working. Virtual team working differs from face to face team working in a number of respects, such as interpreting the alternatives to visual cues, adapting to synchronous communication, developing trust and cohesion and cultural interpretations. However, co-located student teams working within higher education can only simulate team working as it might be experienced in organisations today. For example, students can learn from their mistakes in a non-threatening environment, colleagues tend to be established friends and assessing teamwork encourages behaviour such as “free-riding”. Using a prototyping approach, which involves students and tutors, a system has been designed to support learners engaged in team working. This system helps students to achieve to their full potential and appreciate issues surrounding virtual teamwork. The Guardian Agent system enables teams to allocate project tasks and agree ground rules for the team according to individuals’ preferences. Results from four cycles of its use are presented, together with modifications arising from iterations of testing. The results show that students find the system useful in preparing for team working, and have encouraged further development of the system

‘Our newsroom in the cloud’: Slack, virtual newsrooms and journalistic practice

Virtual newsrooms have enormous potential: enabling journalists around the world to pool their knowledge, skills and perspectives within joint projects, such as the Panama Papers. These virtual newsrooms are supported by Online Collaborative Software (OCS), the most popular of which is Slack. But although many of the world’s top news organisations now use Slack, there is no empirical research examining its impact on workplace processes or culture. This article presents the results of a year-long ethnographic study of a global digital news outlet, whose remote journalists collaborate, almost exclusively, via Slack. We found that the platform deepened relationships and enabled new creative practices across geographic regions. However, it also contributed to the erasure of the line between private and professional spheres for workers, and introduced new opportunities for management to shape newsroom culture. We argue that the concept of ‘space’ as developed by Harvey can helpfully frame the analysis of these new, important digital platforms

Support through patient internet-communities: Lived experience of Russian in vitro fertilization patients

The article is concerned with the life experiences of infertile women going through infertility treatment and their need for social and psychological support, which they try to find in their immediate social environment. The Internet has become one place where everyone can find “people like oneself.” The best support is received from these people who are in the same life situation and are able and willing to share their lived experiences with each other. Communication via the Internet and the formation of a virtual community of patients has both positive and negative aspects, all of which are examined in the article. On the one hand, it creates a psychologically favorable atmosphere and might potentially increase the success rate of IVF treatment. On the other, this leads to the seclusion of patients within the circle of “similar people” and sometimes to negative attitudes towards people outside the circle. The article is based on the author's “netnography” research of a virtual community of Russian In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF)1 patients

Photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped TiO2-based nanowires: a photo-assisted Kelvin probe force microscopy study

The emerging industrial business partnerships, which feature cross-functional and cross-company development efforts, raise the barrier for the establishment of effective knowledge sharing practices in the larger organization. This chapter aims to highlight the role of knowledge as a key enabler for effective engineering activities in the light of such emerging enterprise collaboration models. Knowledge Enabled Engineering (KEE) is presented as an approach to enhance the extended organization’s capability to establish effective collaboration among its parts, in spite of different organizational structures, technologies or processes. KEE is analysed in its constituent parts, highlighting areas, methods and tools that are particularly interesting for leveraging companies’ knowledge sharing capabilities

Internet of things: where to be is to trust

[EN] Networks' creation is getting more and more required, anytime, anywhere. Devices that can participate on these networks can be quite different among them. Sensors, mobiles, home appliances, or other type of devices will have to collaborate to increase and improve the services provided to clients. In the same way, network configuration, security mechanisms establishment, and optimal performance control must be done by them. Some of these devices could have limited resources to work, sometimes even resources restriction not existing, they must work to optimize network traffic. In this article, we center our researching on spontaneous networks. We propose a secure spontaneous ad-hoc network, based on direct peer-to-peer interaction and communities' creation to grant a quick, easy, and secure access to users to surf the Web. Each device will have an identity in the network. Each community will also have an identity and will act as a unity on a world based on Internet connection. Security will be established in the moment they access to the network through the use of the trust chain generated by nodes. Trust is modified by each node on the basis of nodes behaviorLacuesta, R.; Palacios-Navarro, G.; Cetina Englada, C.; Peñalver Herrero, ML.; Lloret, J. (2012). Internet of things: where to be is to trust. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. (203):1-16. doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2012-203S116203Lipnack J, Stamps J: Virtual Teams: Researching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1997.Ahuja MK, Carley KN: Network structure in virtual organizations, organization science, Vol. 10, No. 6, Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations, November–December. 1999, 741-757.Mowshowitz A: Virtual organization. Commun ACM 1997, 40(9):30-37. 10.1145/260750.260759Preuß S: CH Cap, Overview of spontaneous networking-evolving concepts and technologies, in Rostocker Informatik-Berichte. Rostock: Fachbereich Informatik der Universit; 2000:113-123.Feeney LM, Ahlgren B, Westerlund A: Spontaneous networking: an application-oriented approach to ad hoc networking. IEEE Commun Mag 2001, 39(6):176-181. 10.1109/35.925687Latvakoski J, Pakkala D, Pääkkönen P: A communication architecture for spontaneous systems. IEEE Wirel Commun 2004, 11(3):36-42. 10.1109/MWC.2004.1308947Mani M, Nguyen A-M, Crespi N: SCOPE: a prototype for spontaneous P2P social networking. Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops) 2010, 220-225.Legendre F, de Amorim MD, Fdida S: Implicit merging of overlapping spontaneous networks. Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference 2004, 3050-3054.Zarate Silva VH, De Cruz Salgado EI, Ramos Quintana F: AWISPA: an awareness framework for collaborative spontaneous networks. 36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference 2006, 27-31.Perkins CE, Bhagwat P: Highly dynamic destination sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. Proceedings of the Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications (SIGCOMM’94 1994, 234-244.Johnson DB, Maltz DA, Broch J: DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. Boston, MA: Ad Hoc Networking (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing; 2001.Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing, RFC 3561. 2003.Park V, Corson MS: IETF MANET Internet Draft “draft-ietf-MANET-tora-spe03.txt”, November 2000. 2012. Accessed March http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-tora-spec-03Viana AC, De Amorim MD, Fdida S, de Rezende JF: Self-organization in spontaneous networks: the approach of DHT-based routing protocols. Ad Hoc Networks 2005, 3(5):589-606. 10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.08.006Lacuesta R, Peñalver L: IP addresses configuration in spontaneous networks. In Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Computers. Athens, Greece; 2005:1-6.Alvarez-Hamelin JI, Viana AC, de Amorim M Dias: Architectural considerations for a self-configuring routing scheme for spontaneous networks, Technical Report 1. 2005.Lacuesta R, Peñalver L: Automatic configuration of ad-hoc networks: establishing unique IP link-local addresses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies (SECURWARE’07). Valencia, Spain; 2007:157-162.Foulks EF: Social network therapies and society: an overview. Contemp Fam Therapy 1985, 3(4):316-320.IBM: A Smarter Planet. 2012. http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanetMontenegro G, Kushalnagar N, Hui J, Culler D: RFC 4944: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks. 2007.Alcaraz C, Najera P, Lopez J, Roman R: Wireless Sensor Networks and the Internet of Things: Do We Need a Complete Integration?, 1st International workshop on the security of The internet of Things (SecIoT). tokyo (Japan); 2010. . Accessed January 2012 1er International Workshop on the Security of The Internet of Things (SecIoT 2010) http://www.nics.uma.es/seciot10/files/pdf/alcaraz_seciot10_paper.pdfFerscha A, Davies N, Schmidt A, Streitz N: Pervasive Socio-Technical Fabric. Procedia Computer Science 2011, 7: 88-91.Hubaux JP, Buttyán L, Capkun S: The quest for security in mobile ad-hoc networks, in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad-hoc Networking and Computing. 2001, 146-155.Wang Y, Varadharajan V: Interaction trust evaluation in decentralized environments, e-commerce and web technologies. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies, vol LNCS 3182. Springer; 2004:144-153.Jimin L, Junbao L, Aiguo A, Zhenpeng L: Two-way trust evaluation based on feedback. in Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management 2010, 3: 1910-1914.Daskapan S, Nurtanti I, Van den Berg J: Trust algorithms in P2P file sharing networks. Int J Internet Technol Secured Trans 2010, 2(1–2):174-200.Maña A, Koshutanski H, Pérez EJ: A trust negotiation based security framework for service provisioning in load-balancing clusters. Comput Secur 2012, 31(1):4-25. 10.1016/j.cose.2011.11.006Stajano F, Anderson R: The resurrecting duckling security issues for ad-hoc wireless networks. Security Protocols, 7th International Workshop Proceedings, Lecture notes in Computer Science, LNCS 1296 1999, 172-194.Balfanz D, Smetters DK, Stewart P, ChiWong H: Talking to strangers: authentication in ad-hoc wireless networks, in Symposium on Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS’02). San Diego, CA; 2002.Capkun S, Hubaux JP, Buttyán L: Mobility helps security in ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing. MD, USA: Annapolis; 2003:46-56.Metzger MJ: Privacy, trust, and disclosure: exploring barriers to electronic commerce. J Comput-Mediat Commun 2004, 9(4). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/metzger.html 2004, 9(4)