MATERIALS IN RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73465/1/j.1749-6632.1968.tb20274.x.pd

Reliability of non-invasive cardiac output measurement in individuals with tetraplegia

Study design:The study is conducted on the basis of comparative-repeated measures.Objectives:The objective of this study is to assess the reliability of non-invasive cardiac output (CO) measurements in individuals with tetraplegia (TP) at rest and during exercise using Innocor, and to test the hypothesis that CO measurements are less reliable in TP than in able-bodied (AB) individuals.Setting:Ambulatory volunteers, Switzerland.Methods:Nine male motor-complete TP (C5-C7) and nine pair-matched AB performed repeated CO measurements at rest and during submaximal arm-crank and wheelchair exercises in four different test sessions. Within- and between-day reliabilities were compared between TP and AB.Results:Mean differences between measurements at rest (TP vs AB, within-day: 0.1±0.5 vs 0.2±0.6 l min(-1), between-day: -0.7±0.6 vs -0.1±0.8 l min(-1)), during arm-crank (TP vs AB, within-day: 0.1±0.9 vs 0.5±0.7 l min(-1), between-day: -0.3±1.1 vs 0.0±1.1 l min(-1)) and wheelchair exercises (TP vs AB, within-day: 0.3±1.2 vs -0.1±0.8 l min(-1), between-day: 0.1±1.1 vs 0.5±0.9 l min(-1)) were not significantly different between TP and AB (all P>0.05). Coefficients of variation in TP (within-day, rest: 6.8%, arm-crank: 9.6% and wheelchair: 10.8%; between-day, rest: 11.9%, arm-crank: 11.2% and wheelchair: 10.3%) and in AB (within-day, rest: 7.7%, arm crank: 6.8% and wheelchair: 6.0%; between-day, rest: 9.2%, arm crank: 8.5% and wheelchair: 8.0%) indicated acceptable reliability.Conclusion:In contrast to our hypothesis, we found non-invasive CO measurements using Innocor to be as reliable in TP as they are in AB. Consequently, Innocor can be recommended for repeated assessments of CO in TP within routine diagnostics or for evaluation of training progress.Sponsorship:The study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant no. 32-116777).Spinal Cord advance online publication, 21 December 2010; doi:10.1038/sc.2010.173

Consensus on the Key Characteristics of Immunotoxic Agents as a Basis for Hazard Identification

BackgroundKey characteristics (KCs), properties of agents or exposures that confer potential hazard, have been developed for carcinogens and other toxicant classes. KCs have been used in the systematic assessment of hazards and to identify assay and data gaps that limit screening and risk assessment. Many of the mechanisms through which pharmaceuticals and occupational or environmental agents modulate immune function are well recognized. Thus KCs could be identified for immunoactive substances and applied to improve hazard assessment of immunodulatory agents.ObjectivesThe goal was to generate a consensus-based synthesis of scientific evidence describing the KCs of agents known to cause immunotoxicity and potential applications, such as assays to measure the KCs.MethodsA committee of 18 experts with diverse specialties identified 10 KCs of immunotoxic agents, namely, 1) covalently binds to proteins to form novel antigens, 2) affects antigen processing and presentation, 3) alters immune cell signaling, 4) alters immune cell proliferation, 5) modifies cellular differentiation, 6) alters immune cell-cell communication, 7) alters effector function of specific cell types, 8) alters immune cell trafficking, 9) alters cell death processes, and 10) breaks down immune tolerance. The group considered how these KCs could influence immune processes and contribute to hypersensitivity, inappropriate enhancement, immunosuppression, or autoimmunity.DiscussionKCs can be used to improve efforts to identify agents that cause immunotoxicity via one or more mechanisms, to develop better testing and biomarker approaches to evaluate immunotoxicity, and to enable a more comprehensive and mechanistic understanding of adverse effects of exposures on the immune system. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10800