7 research outputs found

    Identification of a biomarker panel for colorectal cancer diagnosis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Malignancies arising in the large bowel cause the second largest number of deaths from cancer in the Western World. Despite progresses made during the last decades, colorectal cancer remains one of the most frequent and deadly neoplasias in the western countries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A genomic study of human colorectal cancer has been carried out on a total of 31 tumoral samples, corresponding to different stages of the disease, and 33 non-tumoral samples. The study was carried out by hybridisation of the tumour samples against a reference pool of non-tumoral samples using Agilent Human 1A 60-mer oligo microarrays. The results obtained were validated by qRT-PCR. In the subsequent bioinformatics analysis, gene networks by means of Bayesian classifiers, variable selection and bootstrap resampling were built. The consensus among all the induced models produced a hierarchy of dependences and, thus, of variables.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After an exhaustive process of pre-processing to ensure data quality--lost values imputation, probes quality, data smoothing and intraclass variability filtering--the final dataset comprised a total of 8, 104 probes. Next, a supervised classification approach and data analysis was carried out to obtain the most relevant genes. Two of them are directly involved in cancer progression and in particular in colorectal cancer. Finally, a supervised classifier was induced to classify new unseen samples.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We have developed a tentative model for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on a biomarker panel. Our results indicate that the gene profile described herein can discriminate between non-cancerous and cancerous samples with 94.45% accuracy using different supervised classifiers (AUC values in the range of 0.997 and 0.955).</p

    Gamificación en Iberoamérica. Experiencias desde la comunicación y la educación

    Get PDF
    La presente obra capitular es el resultado de las investigaciones sobre las aplicaciones de la gamificación en contextos múltiples, emergentes provenientes de las comunicaciones presentadas en el Simposio 06 del III Congreso Internacional Comunicación y Pensamiento (Sevilla, España), así como de aquellas presentadas por los miembros del Gamelab UPS, del Proyecto I+D+i Coordinado “Competencias mediáticas de la ciudadanía en medios digitales emergentes (smartphones y tablets): Prácticas innovadoras y estrategias educomunicativas en contextos múltiples” (EDU2015-64015-C3-1-R) (MINECO/FEDER), de la “Red de Educación Mediática” del Programa Estatal de Investigación Científica-Técnica de Excelencia, Subprograma Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento (EDU2016-81772-REDT), financiados por el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) y Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad de España. En este sentido se busca construir, desde una mirada dual desde Europa y América Latina el primer libro iberoamericano de gamificación, avalado por el Gamelab de la Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Ecuador), el Proyecto I+D+i EDU2015-64015-C3-1-R, la Red Interuniversitaria Euroamericana de Investigación sobre Competencias Mediáticas para la Ciudadanía (Alfamed), el Laboratorio de Estudios en Comunicación (Ladecom) y el Grupo de Investigación Ágora (PAI-HUM-648) de la Universidad de Huelva (España) y el Grupo de Investigación Estructura, Historia y Contenidos de la Comunicación GREHCCO

    Coste del tratamiento del cáncer de mama por estadío clínico en el País Vasco

    No full text
    Background: The burden of breast cancer is important for the healthcare system. In the context of the evaluation of the breast cancer screening program in the Basque Country it is important to determine the unitary costs related to diagnosis as well as the treatment costs depending on the clinical stage at detection. The main objective was to calculate the total cost and the components of breast cancer (BC) treatment depending on the clinical stage by 2011. Methods: The estimated costs include BC diagnosis as so as to initial treatment and follow-up, based on resource consumption and unitary costs of the Basque Health Services. Micro-costing technique was applied based on the clinical guidelines. Results: Our model showed the estimated loss of productivity due to premature The initial cost was 9.838€ for the stage 0, 17.273€ for stage I, 22.145€ for stage II and 28.776€ for stage III. The follow up annual cost was 172€ for the stage 0, 908€ for stage I, 994€ for stage II and 1.166€ for stage III. The annual cost for stage IV was 17879€. Conclusions: Chemotherapy determines the greatest percentage of BC costs. The two main drivers of the total cost of breast cancer are the initial treatment of stages I to III and the cost of stage IV, the latter reaching € 50,061per patient.Fundamentos: La carga económica de la asistencia sanitaria del cáncer de mama es importante. En el contexto de la evaluación del programa de cribado de cáncer de mama del País Vasco es importante conocer los costes unitarios actuales del diagnóstico y el coste de los tratamientos desagregados por el estadío clínico de detección. El objetivo de este estudio fue calcular los costes total y desagregado por componentes del tratamiento del cáncer de mama (CM) según estadío clínico en el año 2011. Métodos: Los costes sanitarios se estimaron desde el diagnóstico hasta la finalización de los tratamientos y seguimiento a partir del consumo de recursos y los costes unitarios del Sistema Vasco de Salud. La técnica aplicada fue el método de micro-costes a partir de las guías de práctica clínica. Resultados: El coste inicial fue de 9.838 € en el estadío 0, de 17.273 € en el I, de 22.145 € en el II y de 28.776 € en el III. El coste del seguimiento anual fue de 172 € en el estadío 0, de 908 € en el I, de 994 € en el II y de 1.166 € en el III. El coste anual del estadío IV fue de 17.879 €. Conclusiones: El componente de mayor coste es la quimioterapia. Los dos determinantes principales del coste total del cáncer de mama son el tratamiento inicial de los estadíos I a III y el coste del estadío IV alcanzando este último los 50.061 € por paciente

    Seroprevalence and immunological memory against SARS-CoV-2 in lung cancer patients : the SOLID study

    Get PDF
    At present, we did not find any articles that studied seroprevalence and its persistence several months later in lung cancer patients in the setting of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Most patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) go on to develop antibodies (Abs) against viral proteins. However, it is not known how long these Abs last nor whether cancer treatments could affect the duration of immune response. This prospective, longitudinal, multicenter serological study in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection was carried out in 50 Spanish hospitals. Eligibility criterion was the diagnosis of any lung cancer. The determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Abs was performed by qualitative immuno-enzymatic assay using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from NovaLisa whose Abs target the recombinant antigen N of the nucleocapsid of SARS-CoV-2. The first Ab determination was performed between April 21 and June 3, 2020. The second Ab determination was performed in all previously seropositive patients, between September 10 and November 20, 2020. Study objectives were to prospectively determine seroprevalence in unselected lung cancer patients during the first wave of the pandemic; the persistence of immunity; protection or lack thereof against reinfection; and the influence of treatments on maintenance or loss of immunity. Of 1,500 patients, 128 were seropositive, overall prevalence of 8.5% seropositivity [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.2-10.1%]. Seventy-five percent were in active cancer treatment. Forty-seven point seven percent of IgG positive participants had experienced a symptomatic illness suspected of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 (95% CI: 38.8-56.6%). A second determination was performed on average 4.5 months later [interquartile range (IQR), 4.0-5.0 months] and obtained for 104 of the initially seropositive patients (81%), it could not be obtained in 24 patients, the majority due to death caused by disease progression (73%). In the second determination, IgG was not detected in 30.8% of patients. The severity of the infection, the need for hospitalization (P=0.032) and the presence of symptoms at diagnosis (P=0.02) were associated with persistence of immunity in the second determination. No variables or treatments received were associated with Abs loss. Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to be compromised by treatment and persists beyond 4 months. Neither do mortality rates appear to be particularly high in this unselected population. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04407143

    Combined effects of marine heatwaves and reduced light on the physiology and growth of the surfgrass Phyllospadix torreyi from Baja California, Mexico

    No full text
    This study aimed to elucidate for the first time the combined effects of marine heatwaves (MHWs) and light limitation simulated in mesocosm on critical physiological descriptors of the surfgrass Phyllospadix torreyi, which constitutes highly productive meadows along the intertidal and subtidal rocky shores of the Pacific coast of North America. Our results revealed that short-term exposure (~7 days) to extreme thermal anomalies of + 9 ◦C had positive effects on the photosynthetic capacities of P. torreyi, as indicated by increments in maximum photosynthetic rates, photosynthetic efficiency (α), maximum electron transport rate, and effective quantum yield. Despite that its photosynthetic performance was enhanced, exposure to warming caused a decrease in its internal carbon reserves (i.e. energy status), likely as a consequence of carbon mobilization/utilization to activate heatstress responses. Plants exposed to light limitation generally exhibited an increase in α and/or a decrease in respiration, which ultimately allowed for a reduction in plant compensation irradiance. The combination of low light and seawater warming resulted in a decrease in non-structural carbohydrates content, daily net-productivity, and leaf growth rates. Gross photosynthetic rates at control saturating irradiance exhibited higher activation energy and, thus, greater responsiveness to seawater warming than plants kept under light limitation. While our results indicated that unusual warming events might favor the photosynthetic performance of P. torreyi, combining this condition with a drastic light reduction can lead to internal carbon depletion and potentially compromise plant survival in the long term.1,51

    Overall Survival and Biomarker Analysis of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Operable Stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NADIM phase II trial).

    No full text
    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nivolumab has been shown to be effective in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the NADIM trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03081689). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have not been reported. This was an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial in which patients with stage IIIA NSCLC, who were deemed to be surgically resectable, were treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 once a day) and carboplatin (area under curve 6) plus nivolumab (360 mg) once on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, for three cycles, followed by adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy for 1 year (240 mg once every 2 weeks for 4 months, followed by 480 mg once every 4 weeks for 8 months). The 3-year OS and ctDNA analysis were secondary objectives of the trial. OS at 36 months was 81.9% (95% CI, 66.8 to 90.6) in the intention-to-treat population, rising to 91.0% (95% CI, 74.2 to 97.0) in the per-protocol population. Neither tumor mutation burden nor programmed cell death ligand-1 staining was predictive of survival. Conversely, low pretreatment levels of ctDNA were significantly associated with improved progression-free survival and OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.63, and HR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.39, respectively). Clinical responses according to RECIST v1.1 criteria did not predict survival outcomes. However, undetectable ctDNA levels after neoadjuvant treatment were significantly associated with progression-free survival and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.93, and HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.55, respectively). The C-index to predict OS for ctDNA levels after neoadjuvant treatment (0.82) was superior to that of RECIST criteria (0.72). The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nivolumab in resectable NSCLC is supported by 3-year OS. ctDNA levels were significantly associated with OS and outperformed radiologic assessments in the prediction of survival
    corecore