15 research outputs found

    Prevention and treatment practices of pediculosis capitis in Comodoro Rivadavia, Argentina

    Get PDF
    Para evaluar los procedimientos y las sustancias que la poblaci贸n de Comodoro Rivadavia emplea contra la pediculosis en escolares, se analizaron los resultados de 4951 encuestas realizadas entre 2006 y 2007. El 95% de los encuestados revisa peri贸dicamente la cabeza de los ni帽os, lo que resulta favorable para el control de la afecci贸n. El 56,4% emplea procedimientos o productos preventivos adecuados, mientras el resto utiliza otros de escasa efectividad preventiva (inocuos o peligrosos). Un 38,11% utiliza tratamientos de acci贸n comprobada. Se constat贸 el uso de productos no indicados para la pediculosis o inefectivos, algunos inocuos y otros con potenciales efectos indeseados. En general, se observa poco discernimiento entre prevenci贸n y tratamiento. Se evidenciaron pr谩cticas y creencias err贸neas, tales como la vinculaci贸n de la pediculosis con falta de higiene, el uso preventivo de pediculicidas, as铆 como el empleo de productos inefectivos para tratar pediculosis activa: entre otros jab贸n blanco, vinagre, repelentes y desinfectantes e insecticidas de uso veterinario y dom茅stico.In order to analyze products and procedures that Comodoro Rivadavia population uses against head lice in school children, results from 4951 surveys obtained in 2006 and 2007 are presented. It is advantageous that 95% of the parents check frequently over the children scalps. About 56,4% uses appropriate preventive products or procedures, while the others use ineffective (innocuous or dangerous) substances. A 38,11% of the population uses appropriate treatment products. The use of products which are not indicated in pediculosis treatment or are ineffective against the infection (innocuous or unsafe substances) was evidenced. Generally, there is scarce differentiation between prevention and treatment. Additionally, erroneous believes and practices were detected: association pediculosis - poor hygiene practices, preventive use of pediculicides, as well as use of ineffective treatment products: soap, vinegar, repellents, and the use of veterinary or domestic disinfectants and insecticides.Colegio de Farmac茅uticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aire

    Prevention and treatment practices of pediculosis capitis in Comodoro Rivadavia, Argentina

    Get PDF
    Para evaluar los procedimientos y las sustancias que la poblaci贸n de Comodoro Rivadavia emplea contra la pediculosis en escolares, se analizaron los resultados de 4951 encuestas realizadas entre 2006 y 2007. El 95% de los encuestados revisa peri贸dicamente la cabeza de los ni帽os, lo que resulta favorable para el control de la afecci贸n. El 56,4% emplea procedimientos o productos preventivos adecuados, mientras el resto utiliza otros de escasa efectividad preventiva (inocuos o peligrosos). Un 38,11% utiliza tratamientos de acci贸n comprobada. Se constat贸 el uso de productos no indicados para la pediculosis o inefectivos, algunos inocuos y otros con potenciales efectos indeseados. En general, se observa poco discernimiento entre prevenci贸n y tratamiento. Se evidenciaron pr谩cticas y creencias err贸neas, tales como la vinculaci贸n de la pediculosis con falta de higiene, el uso preventivo de pediculicidas, as铆 como el empleo de productos inefectivos para tratar pediculosis activa: entre otros jab贸n blanco, vinagre, repelentes y desinfectantes e insecticidas de uso veterinario y dom茅stico.In order to analyze products and procedures that Comodoro Rivadavia population uses against head lice in school children, results from 4951 surveys obtained in 2006 and 2007 are presented. It is advantageous that 95% of the parents check frequently over the children scalps. About 56,4% uses appropriate preventive products or procedures, while the others use ineffective (innocuous or dangerous) substances. A 38,11% of the population uses appropriate treatment products. The use of products which are not indicated in pediculosis treatment or are ineffective against the infection (innocuous or unsafe substances) was evidenced. Generally, there is scarce differentiation between prevention and treatment. Additionally, erroneous believes and practices were detected: association pediculosis - poor hygiene practices, preventive use of pediculicides, as well as use of ineffective treatment products: soap, vinegar, repellents, and the use of veterinary or domestic disinfectants and insecticides.Colegio de Farmac茅uticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aire

    Prevention and treatment practices of pediculosis capitis in Comodoro Rivadavia, Argentina

    Get PDF
    Para evaluar los procedimientos y las sustancias que la poblaci贸n de Comodoro Rivadavia emplea contra la pediculosis en escolares, se analizaron los resultados de 4951 encuestas realizadas entre 2006 y 2007. El 95% de los encuestados revisa peri贸dicamente la cabeza de los ni帽os, lo que resulta favorable para el control de la afecci贸n. El 56,4% emplea procedimientos o productos preventivos adecuados, mientras el resto utiliza otros de escasa efectividad preventiva (inocuos o peligrosos). Un 38,11% utiliza tratamientos de acci贸n comprobada. Se constat贸 el uso de productos no indicados para la pediculosis o inefectivos, algunos inocuos y otros con potenciales efectos indeseados. En general, se observa poco discernimiento entre prevenci贸n y tratamiento. Se evidenciaron pr谩cticas y creencias err贸neas, tales como la vinculaci贸n de la pediculosis con falta de higiene, el uso preventivo de pediculicidas, as铆 como el empleo de productos inefectivos para tratar pediculosis activa: entre otros jab贸n blanco, vinagre, repelentes y desinfectantes e insecticidas de uso veterinario y dom茅stico.In order to analyze products and procedures that Comodoro Rivadavia population uses against head lice in school children, results from 4951 surveys obtained in 2006 and 2007 are presented. It is advantageous that 95% of the parents check frequently over the children scalps. About 56,4% uses appropriate preventive products or procedures, while the others use ineffective (innocuous or dangerous) substances. A 38,11% of the population uses appropriate treatment products. The use of products which are not indicated in pediculosis treatment or are ineffective against the infection (innocuous or unsafe substances) was evidenced. Generally, there is scarce differentiation between prevention and treatment. Additionally, erroneous believes and practices were detected: association pediculosis - poor hygiene practices, preventive use of pediculicides, as well as use of ineffective treatment products: soap, vinegar, repellents, and the use of veterinary or domestic disinfectants and insecticides.Colegio de Farmac茅uticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aire

    Pharmaceutical waste in Comodoro Rivadavia, Argentina

    No full text
    Se analizaron 37 farmacias y 11 dependencias municipales para evaluar la generaci贸n de residuos de medicamentos en instituciones locales. Los datos hallados fueron poco significativos al compararlos con los residuos biopatog茅nicos por volumen y peligrosidad. La generaci贸n domiciliaria de medicamentos caducos es mayor que la institucional. Se propone no incluir en la misma norma residuos biopatog茅nicos y medicamentos (por diferencias en el riesgo que involucran, recaudos de manejo y tratamientos requeridos), unificar nomenclatura en distintas jurisdicciones, devolver todos los medicamentos vencidos a los laboratorios de origen e implementar un sistema de recupero de medicamentos inutilizados en hogares para su disposici贸n adecuada, bajo supervisi贸n farmac茅utica.Thirty-seven pharmacies and eleven community health centers were studied in order to evaluate the local pharmaceutical waste generation. The values obtained were of not much significance when their volume and riskness were compared with biopatogenic waste. Home generation of pharmaceutical waste was greater than institutional generation. It is proposed not to include biopatogenic and pharmaceutical waste in the same rule because of their differences in risk, management care and required treatments; to unify nomenclature in different jurisdictions; to return all expired pharmaceuticals to manufacturers, and to develop a recover system from homes to give the expired pharmaceuticals an appropriate management under a pharmacist responsibility.Colegio de Farmac茅uticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aire

    Pharmaceutical waste in Comodoro Rivadavia, Argentina

    No full text
    Se analizaron 37 farmacias y 11 dependencias municipales para evaluar la generaci贸n de residuos de medicamentos en instituciones locales. Los datos hallados fueron poco significativos al compararlos con los residuos biopatog茅nicos por volumen y peligrosidad. La generaci贸n domiciliaria de medicamentos caducos es mayor que la institucional. Se propone no incluir en la misma norma residuos biopatog茅nicos y medicamentos (por diferencias en el riesgo que involucran, recaudos de manejo y tratamientos requeridos), unificar nomenclatura en distintas jurisdicciones, devolver todos los medicamentos vencidos a los laboratorios de origen e implementar un sistema de recupero de medicamentos inutilizados en hogares para su disposici贸n adecuada, bajo supervisi贸n farmac茅utica.Thirty-seven pharmacies and eleven community health centers were studied in order to evaluate the local pharmaceutical waste generation. The values obtained were of not much significance when their volume and riskness were compared with biopatogenic waste. Home generation of pharmaceutical waste was greater than institutional generation. It is proposed not to include biopatogenic and pharmaceutical waste in the same rule because of their differences in risk, management care and required treatments; to unify nomenclature in different jurisdictions; to return all expired pharmaceuticals to manufacturers, and to develop a recover system from homes to give the expired pharmaceuticals an appropriate management under a pharmacist responsibility.Colegio de Farmac茅uticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aire
    corecore