Een kijkje bij het leernetwerk Onderwijs op Maat

De Netwerk Barometer wordt ingezet bij een leernetwerk

Steering Representations—Towards a Critical Understanding of Digital Twins

Digital Twins are conceptualised in the academic technical discourse as real-time realistic digital representations of physical entities. Originating from product engineering, the Digital Twin quickly advanced into other fields, including the life sciences and earth sciences. Digital Twins are seen by the tech sector as the new promising tool for efficiency and optimisation, while governmental agencies see it as a fruitful means for improving decision-making to meet sustainability goals. A striking example of the latter is the European Commission who wishes to delegate a significant role to Digital Twins in addressing climate change and supporting Green Deal policy. As Digital Twins give rise to high expectations, ambitions, and are being entrusted important societal roles, it is crucial to critically reflect on the nature of Digital Twins. In this article, we therefore philosophically reflect on Digital Twins by critically analysing dominant conceptualisations, the assumptions underlying them, and their normative implications. We dissect the concept and argue that a Digital Twin does not merely fulfil the role of being a representation, but is in fact a steering technique used to direct a physical entity towards certain goals by means of multiple representations. Currently, this steering seems mainly fuelled by a reductionist approach focused on efficiency and optimisation. However, this is not the only direction from which a Digital Twin can be thought and, consequently, designed and deployed. We therefore set an agenda based on a critical understanding of Digital Twins that helps to draw out their beneficial potential, while addressing their potential issues

Scrutinizing environmental governance in a digital age: New ways of seeing, participating, and intervening

Digital technologies play an increasingly important role in addressing environmental challenges, such as climate change and resource depletion. Yet, the characteristics and implications of digitalized environmental governance are still under-conceptualized. In this perspective, we distinguish three dimensions of governance: (1) seeing and knowing, (2) participation and engagement, and (3) interventions and actions. For each dimension, we provide a critical perspective on the shifts that digital technologies generate in governance. We argue against the assumption that the use of digital technologies automatically results in improved outcomes or in more democratic decision-making. Instead, attention needs to be paid to the wider political and normative context in which digital technologies are proposed, designed, and used as environmental governance tools. We conclude with key questions for academics and policymakers to broaden the debate on responsible design and use of digital technologies in environmental governance

Homology, homoplasy and cusp variability at the enamel-dentine junction of hominoid molars

Evolutionary studies of mammalian teeth have generally concentrated on the adaptive and functional significance of dental features, whereas the role of development on phenotypic generation and as a source of variation has received comparatively little attention. The present study combines an evolutionary biological framework with state-of-the-art imaging techniques to examine the developmental basis of variation of accessory cusps. Scholars have long used the position and relatedness of cusps to other crown structures as a criterion for differentiating between developmentally homologous and homoplastic features, which can be evaluated with greater accuracy at the enamel–dentine junction (EDJ). Following this approach, we collected digital models of the EDJ and outer enamel surface of more than 1000 hominoid teeth to examine whether cusp 5 of the upper molars (UM C5) and cusps 6 and 7 of the lower molars (LM C6 and LM C7) were associated each with a common developmental origin across species. Results revealed that each of these cusps can develop in a variety of ways, in association with different dental tissues (i.e. oral epithelium, enamel matrix) and dental structures (i.e. from different cusps, crests and cingula). Both within and between species variability in cusp origin was highest in UM C5, followed by LM C7, and finally LM C6. The lack of any species-specific patterns suggests that accessory cusps in hominoids are developmentally homoplastic and that they may not be useful for identifying phylogenetic homology. An important and unanticipated finding of this study was the identification of a new taxonomically informative feature at the EDJ of the upper molars, namely the post-paracone tubercle (PPT). We found that the PPT was nearly ubiquitous in H. neanderthalensis and the small sample of Middle Pleistocene African and European humans (MPAE) examined, differing significantly from the low frequencies observed in all other hominoids, including Pleistocene and recent H. sapiens. We emphasize the utility of the EDJ for human evolutionary studies and demonstrate how features that look similar at the external surface may be the product of different developmental patterns. This study also highlights the importance of incorporating both developmental and morphological data into evolutionary studies in order to gain a better understanding of the evolutionary significance of dental and skeletal features

Endostructural morphology in hominoid mandibular third premolars: discrete traits at the enamel-dentine junction

For access to specimens, we would like to thank Bernhard Zipfel, Lee Berger, Sifelani Jira (Evolutionary Studies Intitute, University of the Witwatersrand), Miriam Tawane (Ditsong Museum), Job Kibii (National Museums of Kenya), Metasebia Endalemaw, Yared Assefa (Ethiopian Authority for Research and Conservation of Cultural heritage), Yoel Rak, Alon Barash, Israel Hershkovitz (Sackler School of Medicine), Michel Toussaint (ASBL Archéologie Andennaise, Jean-Jacques Cleyet-Merle (Musée National de Préhistoire des Eyzies-de-Tayac), Ullrich Glasmacher (Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Heidelberg), Robert Asher, Hendrik Turni, Irene Mann (Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin), Jakov Radovčić (Croatian Natural History Museum), Christophe Boesch and Uta Schwarz (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology) and the Leipzig University Anatomical Collection (ULAC). For project support we thank Zeresenay Alemseged and Bill Kimbel. We would also like to thank the reviewers, the associate editor and the editor for their helpful comments and guidance, as well as Ottmar Kullmer for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was funded by the Max Planck Society, and financial support for L.K.D. was provided by a Connor Family Faculty Fellowship and the Office of Research and Development at the University of Arkansa