A practical laboratory index to predict institutionalization and mortality - an 18-year population-based follow-up study

BackgroundPreviously, several indexes based on a large number of clinical and laboratory tests to predict mortality and frailty have been produced. However, there is still a need for an easily applicable screening tool for every-day clinical practice.MethodsA prospective study with 10- and 18-year follow-ups. Fourteen common laboratory tests were combined to an index. Cox regression model was used to analyse the association of the laboratory index with institutionalization and mortality.ResultsThe mean age of the participants (n =1153) was 73.6 (SD 6.8, range 64.0-100.0) years. Altogether, 151 (14.8%) and 305 (29.9%) subjects were institutionalized and 422 (36.6%) and 806 (69.9%) subjects deceased during the 10- and 18-year follow-ups, respectively. Higher LI (laboratory index) scores predicted increased mortality. Mortality rates increased as LI scores increased both in unadjusted and in age- and gender-adjusted models during both follow-ups. The LI did not significantly predict institutionalization either during the 10- or 18-year follow-ups.ConclusionsA practical index based on routine laboratory tests can be used to predict mortality among older people. An LI could be automatically counted from routine laboratory results and thus an easily applicable screening instrument in clinical settings.Peer reviewe

A practical laboratory index to predict institutionalization and mortality - an 18-year population-based follow-up study

Background Previously, several indexes based on a large number of clinical and laboratory tests to predict mortality and frailty have been produced. However, there is still a need for an easily applicable screening tool for every-day clinical practice.Methods A prospective study with 10- and 18-year follow-ups. Fourteen common laboratory tests were combined to an index. Cox regression model was used to analyse the association of the laboratory index with institutionalization and mortality.Results The mean age of the participants (n =1153) was 73.6 (SD 6.8, range 64.0-100.0) years. Altogether, 151 (14.8%) and 305 (29.9%) subjects were institutionalized and 422 (36.6%) and 806 (69.9%) subjects deceased during the 10- and 18-year follow-ups, respectively. Higher LI (laboratory index) scores predicted increased mortality. Mortality rates increased as LI scores increased both in unadjusted and in age- and gender-adjusted models during both follow-ups. The LI did not significantly predict institutionalization either during the 10- or 18-year follow-ups.Conclusions A practical index based on routine laboratory tests can be used to predict mortality among older people. An LI could be automatically counted from routine laboratory results and thus an easily applicable screening instrument in clinical settings.</strong

Low free 25-hydroxyvitamin D and high vitamin D binding protein and parathyroid hormone in obese Caucasians. A complex association with bone?

Background Studies have shown altered vitamin D metabolism in obesity. We assessed differences between obese and normal-weight subjects in total, free, and bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH) D, 25(OH) D-Free, and 25(OH) D-Bio, respectively), vitamin D binding protein (DBP), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone traits. Methods 595 37-47-year-old healthy Finnish men and women stratified by BMI were examined in this cross-sectional study. Background characteristic and intakes of vitamin D and calcium were collected. The concentrations of 25(OH) D, PTH, DBP, albumin and bone turnover markers were determined from blood. 25(OH) D-Free and 25(OH) D-Bio were calculated. pQCT was performed at radius and tibia. Results Mean +/- SE (ANCOVA) 25(OH) D-Free (10.8 +/- 0.6 vs 12.9 +/- 0.4 nmol/L; P = 0.008) and 25(OH) DBio (4.1 +/- 0.3 vs 5.1 +/- 0.1 nmol/L; P = 0.003) were lower in obese than in normal-weight women. In men, 25(OH) D (48.0 +/- 2.4 vs 56.4 +/- 2.0 nmol/L, P = 0.003), 25(OH) D-Free (10.3 +/- 0.7 vs 12.5 +/- 0.6 pmol/L; P = 0.044) and 25(OH) D-Bio (4.2 +/- 0.3 vs 5.1 +/- 0.2 nmol/L; P = 0.032) were lower in obese. Similarly in all subjects, 25(OH) D, 25(OH) D-Free and 25(OH) D-Bio were lower in obese (P Conclusions The associations between BMI and 25(OH) D, 25(OH) D-Free, and 25(OH) D-Bio, DBP, and PTH suggest that obese subjects may differ from normal-weight subjects in vitamin D metabolism. BMI associated positively with trabecular bone traits and CSI in our study, and slightly negatively with cortical bone traits. Surprisingly, there was a negative association of free and bioavailable 25(OH) D and some of the bone traits in obese women.Peer reviewe

Autoantibodies binding citrullinated type I and II collagens in rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease with symmetrical articular manifestations. The etiology of the disease is unknown. The prevalence of RA is approximately 0.5–1.0% in adults. In Finland, the annual incidence is 39/100 000. RA is about three times more common in females than in males. Most commonly the disease affects first the joints of feet and fingers. Chronic inflammation leads to erosions of cartilage, bone and tendons and may destroy the whole joint. The diagnosis of RA is mainly based on the clinical features of the disease. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 revised classification criteria of RA have commonly been used for diagnosis. No specific diagnostic test is available. Rheumatoid factor (RF) has traditionally been used in the diagnosis, but only 70 to 80% of RA patients have RF in their serum. Other antibodies found in RA are the antiperinuclear factor (APF), the anti-keratin antibody (AKA) and the antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), which recognize the citrulline-containing antigenic filaggrin protein. Citrulline is an amino acid that is post-translationally formed from arginine by peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes (PADs). Autoantibodies to citrullinated proteins are more specific for RA than RF. There is no filaggrin in joints, which indicates that the autoantibodies reacting with this protein most probably only reflect immunological cross-reaction. It has been postulated that autoimmunity against collagens might be involved in the pathogenesis of RA. There are antibodies binding to collagen in cartilage (type II collagen) and in bone (type I collagen). They have been tested by using collagen preparations rendered soluble by pepsin digestion. This digestion removes the carboxyterminal (C-terminal) telopeptides of collagen. Autoantibodies to the C-telopeptides of type I and II collagens were studied in this doctoral research. Autoantibodies to the citrullinated C-telopeptides of type I and II collagens were found in the serum of patients with RA. ELISA, CLIA and inhibition ELISA were used to detect these autoantibodies. Automatic CLIA gives a more than twofold number of positive findings compared to previous ELISA. Currently the best method for the detection of these autoantibodies is inhibition ELISA. These autoantibodies are specific for citrulline in the peptide sequence. Autoantibodies that bind the normal C-telopeptides of type I and II collagens were not inhibited by soluble normal or citrullinated telopeptides. However, the antibodies that bind only citrullinated telopeptides could be inhibited by corresponding citrullinated telopeptides. Autoantibodies binding the citrullinated telopeptides of type II collagen and anti-CCP predict synergistically the development of seropositive RA.Tiivistelmä Nivelreuma (arthritis rheumatoides) on krooninen autoimmuunisairaus, jonka aiheuttajaa ei tunneta. Nivelreuman esiintyvyys aikuisilla on 0.5–1.0 prosenttia. Siihen sairastuu vuosittain 39/100 000 suomalaista aikuista. Naiset sairastavat nivelreumaa kolme kertaa yleisemmin kuin miehet. Sairaus alkaa tavallisesti päkiöistä ja sormien nivelistä. Nivelreuma aiheuttaa ruston, luun ja nivelsiteiden syöpymistä ja voi lopulta tuhota koko nivelen. Nivelreuman diagnoosi perustuu pääasiassa taudin kliinisiin piirteisiin. Yhdysvaltain reumajärjestön (American College of Rheumatology, ACR) vuonna 1987 esittämät luokittelukriteerit ovat yleisesti käytössä. Taudin toteamiseen ei ole spesifistä laboratoriotestiä. Perinteisesti käytettyä reumatekijää esiintyy 70–80 prosentilla potilaista. Muita nivelreumapotilaan seerumista esiintyviä vasta-aineita ovat antiperinukleriaaritekijä (APF), keratiinivasta-aineet (AKA) ja vasta-aineet sykliseen sitrullinisoituneeseen peptidiin (CCP). Sitrulliini on aminohappo, jonka peptidyyliarginiini deiminaasi -entsyymit (PAD) ovat muokanneet arginiinista posttranslationaalisesti. Sitrullinisoituneiden proteiinien autovasta-aineet ovat spesifisempiä nivelreumassa kuin reumatekijä. Nivelissä ei ole filaggriinia, mikä viittaa siihen, että todetut vasta-aineet perustuvat immunologiseen ristireaktioon. On epäilty, että nivelreuman patogeneesiin voisi liittyä autoimmuniteettia kollageeniin. Aiemmin tutkitut luun ja ruston (tyypin I ja II) kollageenivasta-aineet eivät ole olleet sitrullinisoituneita. Autovasta-ainetesteissä on käytetty pepsiinidigestiota, jolla kollageeni on saatu liukoiseksi. Pepsiinidigestio tuhoaa kuitenkin kollageenin karboksyyliterminaaliset (C-terminal) telopeptidit. Tässä väitöskirjatutkimuksessa tutkittiin tyypin I ja II kollageenien C-telopeptidejä. Nivelreumapotilaiden seerumissa todettiin autovasta-aineita, jotka sitoutuvat sitrullinisoituneisiin tyypin I ja II kollageeneihin. Todettuja vasta-aineita voidaan osoittaa ELISA-, CLIA- ja inhibitio-ELISA-menetelmillä. Automaattisella CLIA:lla saadaan kaksi kertaa enemmän positiivisia löydöksiä kuin aiemmin kehitetyllä ELISA:lla. Tällä hetkellä paras menetelmä näiden autovasta-aineiden osoittamiseen on inhibitio-ELISA. Todetut vasta-aineet ovat spesifisiä peptidin sekvenssissä olevaan sitrulliiniin. Vasta-aineita, jotka sitoutuvat normaaliin tyypin I ja II kollageenien C-telopeptidiin, ei voida inhiboida liukoisella normaalilla eikä sitrullinoidulla telopeptidillä. Kuitenkin vasta-aineita, jotka sitoutuvat vain sitrullinisoituihin telopeptideihin, voidaan inhiboida vastaavalla liukoisella sitrullinisoidulla telopeptidillä. Autovasta-aineet, jotka sitoutuvat samanaikaisesti sitrullinisoituneeseen tyypin II kollageenin C-telopeptidiin ja anti-CCP:hen ennustavat seropositiivista nivelreumaa

Dietary phosphorus intake is negatively associated with bone formation among women and positively associated with some bone traits among men-a cross-sectional study in middle-aged Caucasians

High dietary phosphorus (P) intake has acute negative effects on calcium (Ca) and bone metabolism, but long-term clinical data are contradictory. We hypothesized that high P intake is associated with impaired bone health as suggested by earlier short-term studies on bone metabolism. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated associations between dietary P intake, bone traits in the radius and tibia, and bone turnover in a population-based sample of 37- to 47-year-old Caucasian premenopausal women (n = 333) and men (n = 179) living in Southern Finland (60 degrees N). We used various regression models in an "elaboration approach" to elucidate the role of P intake in bone traits and turnover. The addition of relevant covariates to the models mainly removed the significance of P intake as a determinant of bone traits. In the final regression model (P intake, weight, height, age, Ca intake, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, physical activity, smoking, contraceptive use in women), P intake was slightly positively associated only with bone mineral content and cross-sectional cortical bone area in the tibia of men. Among women, inclusion of Ca removed all existing significance in the crude models for any bone trait. In women P intake was negatively associated with the bone formation marker serum intact pro-collagen type I amino-terminal propeptide, whereas no association was present between P intake and bone turnover in men. In conclusion, these findings disagree with the hypothesis; P intake was not deleteriously associated with bone traits; however, P intake may negatively contribute to bone formation among women. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe