Peak or sustained antibiotic serum levels for optimal tissue penetration

A comparative study of the levels of netilmicin in bronchial secretions after intermittent and during continuous intravenous injections was performed. During the first 2 h, the areas under the drug concentration curves in the bolus injection experiment were greater in serum and in bronchial secretions (206 and 150% respectively) than those associated with the continuous infusion (P<0.001); however, during the 8 h experimental period, the areas under the curves were similar in serum and bronchial secretions with the two modes of administration. The percentages of penetration of netilmicin from the blood to the bronchial lumen were also similar with the two modes of administration (19%). After intramuscular administration of amikacin (7.5 and 12.5 mg/kg twice daily), the peak bronchial secretion levels of the drug were 4.4 and 10.1 mg/l respectively and the trough levels about 1 mg/l. During continuous iv injection of amikacin (7-12 mg/kg/8 h), the drug level in the bronchial secretions was only 2.0 mg/l and the percentage of penetration was 14.9% adequate anti-Pseudomonas activity in bronchial secretions was rarely achieved. It is therefore suggested that intermittent injections of aminoglycosides can result in at least transitory higher bronchial secretion levels than continuous injection: the intermittent schedule of antibiotic administration could therefore be recommended in the treatment of bronchopulmonary infections since it has been suggested that the concentration of antibiotic in bronchial secretions could be important in the outcome of these infection

Risk Assessment in Adult Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia: A Review of Methods and of Risk-adapted Empiric Treatments

Febrile neutropenia is a common complication of antineoplasic chemotherapy. It is a potentially serious event, sometimes lethal. However, it is well recognized that the population of patients with febrile neutropenia is heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. Simplified therapy, for instance oral antibiotic empiric treatment or ambulatory treatment, in comparison to the classical management of intravenously administered empiric antibiotics and in-hospital surveillance, has been the purpose of research for patients predicted at low-risk for serious complications development. However, for such a strategy to be successful an accurate identification of patients at low-risk is required. The objective of the present review is to present the available tools for risk assessment, in adult patients populations and to review the status of our knowledge regarding the efficacy and the safety of risk-adapted therapy

Association between Antifungal Prophylaxis and Rate of Documented Bacteremia in Febrile Neutropenic Cancer Patients

Published data have suggested a correlation between antifungal prophylaxis and bacteremia in febrile neutropenia. This correlation was investigated among 3002 febrile neutropenic patients enrolled in 4 trials during 1986-1994. Globally, 1322 patients (44%) did not receive antifungal prophylaxis; 835 (28%) received poorly absorbable antifungal agents and 845 (28%) received absorbable antifungal agents. The rates of bacteremia for these groups were 20%, 26%, and 27%, respectively (P=.0001). In a multivariate model without including antifungal prophylaxis, factors associated with bacteremia were: age, duration of hospitalization, duration of neutropenia before enrollment, underlying disease, presence of an intravenous catheter, shock, antibacterial prophylaxis, temperature, and granulocyte count at onset of fever. When antifungal prophylaxis was included, the adjustment quality of the model improved slightly (P=.05), with an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.55) for patients receiving nonabsorbable and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.07-1.88) for those who were receiving absorbable antifungal agents. Antifungal prophylaxis with absorbable agents might have an impact on the rate of documented bacteremia in febrile neutropenia. This effect should be confirmed prospectivel

Management of Febrile Neutropenia - a German Prospective Hospital Cost Analysis in Lymphoproliferative Disorders, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Primary Breast Cancer

Background: Febrile neutropenia/leukopenia (FN/FL) is the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, but German data on economic consequences are limited. Patients and Methods: A prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational study was carried out to evaluate the occurrence of FN/FL and its impact on health resource utilization and costs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD), and primary breast cancer (PBC) patients. Costs are presented from a hospital perspective. Results: A total of 325 consecutive patients (47% LPD, 37% NSCLC, 16% PBC; 46% women; 38% age >= 65 years) with 68 FN/FL episodes were evaluated. FN/FL occurred in 22% of the LPD patients, 8% of the NSCLC patients, and 27% of the PBC patients. 55 FN/FL episodes were associated with at least 1 hospital stay (LPD n = 34, NSCLC n = 10, PBC n = 11). Mean (median) cost per FN/FL episode requiring hospital care amounted to (sic) 3,950 ((sic) 2,355) and varied between (sic) 4,808 ((sic) 3,056) for LPD, (sic) 3,627 ((sic) 2,255) for NSCLC, and (sic) 1,827 ((sic) 1,969) for PBC patients. 12 FN/FL episodes (LPD n = 9, NSCLC n = 3) accounted for 60% of the total expenses. Main cost drivers were hospitalization and drugs (60 and 19% of the total costs). Conclusions: FN/FL treatment has economic relevance for hospitals. Costs vary between tumour types, being significantly higher for LPD compared to PBC patients. The impact of clinical characteristics on asymmetrically distributed costs needs further evaluation

Costs associated with febrile neutropenia in solid tumor and lymphoma patients - an observational study in Singapore.

BackgroundThe primary objective was to describe the total direct inpatient costs among solid tumor and lymphoma patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) and the factors that were associated with higher direct cost. The secondary objective was to describe the out-of-pocket patient payments and the factors that were associated with higher out-of-pocket patient payments.MethodsThis was a single-center observational study conducted at the largest cancer center in Singapore. All of the adult cancer patients hospitalized due to FN from 2009 to 2012 were studied. The primary outcomes were the total hospital cost and the out-of-pocket patient payments (adjusted by government subsidy) per FN episode. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were conducted to identify the factors associated with higher FN costs.ResultsThree hundred and sixty seven adult cancer patients were documented with FN-related hospitalizations. The mean total hospital cost was US$4,193 (95$3,779-4,607) and the mean out-of-pocket patient payment was US$2,230 (95$1,976-2,484), per FN episode. The factors associated with a higher total hospital cost were longer length of stay, severe sepsis, and lymphoma as underlying cancer. The out-of-pocket patient payment was positively associated with longer length of stay, severe sepsis, lymphoma diagnosed as underlying cancer, the therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), the private ward class, and younger patients.ConclusionsThe total hospital cost and out-of-pocket patient payments of FN management in lymphoma cases were substantial compared with other solid tumors. Factors associated with a higher FN management cost may be useful for developing appropriate strategies to reduce the cost of FN for cancer patients

Institutional Experience with Voriconazole Compared with Liposomal Amphotericin B as Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenia

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90034/1/phco.27.7.970.pd

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is associated with poor survival. Platinum‐based chemotherapy is often a first‐line treatment. Pemetrexed has shown single‐agent activity in SCCHN and in combination with cisplatin for other tumors. This trial examined the efficacy of pemetrexed‐cisplatin for SCCHN. METHODS: In a double‐blind phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease were randomized to pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 ) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ; n = 398) or placebo plus cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ; n = 397) to assess overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Median OS was 7.3 months in the pemetrexed‐cisplatin arm and 6.3 months in the placebo‐cisplatin arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75‐1.02; P = .082). Median progression‐free survival (PFS, months) was similar in both treatment arms (pemetrexed‐cisplatin, 3.6; placebo‐cisplatin, 2.8; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76‐1.03; P = .166). Among patients with performance status 0 or 1, pemetrexed‐cisplatin (n = 347) led to longer OS and PFS than placebo‐cisplatin (n = 343; 8.4 vs 6.7 months; HR, 0.83; P = .026; 4.0 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.84; P = .044, respectively). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancers, pemetrexed‐cisplatin (n = 86) resulted in longer OS and PFS than placebo‐cisplatin (n = 106; 9.9 vs 6.1 months; HR, 0.59; P = .002; 4.0 vs 3.4 months; HR, 0.73; P = .047, respectively). Pemetrexed‐cisplatin toxicity was consistent with studies in other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed‐cisplatin compared with placebo‐cisplatin did not significantly improve survival for the intent‐to‐treat population. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, pemetrexed‐cisplatin showed OS and PFS advantage for patients with performance status 0 or 1 or oropharyngeal cancers. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society. In a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trial, patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are randomized to pemetrexed plus cisplatin or placebo plus cisplatin to assess overall survival and secondary endpoints. Pemetrexed‐cisplatin does not significantly improve survival for the intention‐to‐treat population. However, in a preplanned subgroup analysis, pemetrexed‐cisplatin leads to longer overall survival and progression‐free survival for patients with performance status 0 or 1 and patients with oropharyngeal cancers.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93741/1/27449_ftp.pd

Reversible Proximal Renal Tubular Dysfunction after One-Time Ifosfamide Exposure

The alkylating agent ifosfamide is an anti-neoplastic used to treat various pediatric and adult malignancies. Its potential urologic toxicities include glomerulopathy, tubulopathy and hemorrhagic cystitis. This report describes a case of proximal renal tubular dysfunction and hemorrhagic cystitis in a 67-year-old male given ifosfamide for epitheloid sarcoma. He was also receiving an oral hypoglycemic agent for type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a baseline glomerular filtration rate of 51.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. Despite mesna prophylaxis, the patient experienced dysuria and gross hematuria after a single course of ifosfamide plus adriamycin. The abrupt renal impairment and serum/urine electrolyte imbalances that ensued were consistent with Fanconi's syndrome. However, normal renal function and electrolyte status were restored within 14 days, simply through supportive measures. A score of 8 by Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated these complications were most likely treatment-related, although they developed without known predisposing factors. The currently undefined role of diabetic nephropathy in adult ifosfamide nephrotoxicity merits future investigation