8 research outputs found
How Image Degradations Affect Deep CNN-based Face Recognition?
Face recognition approaches that are based on deep convolutional neural
networks (CNN) have been dominating the field. The performance improvements
they have provided in the so called in-the-wild datasets are significant,
however, their performance under image quality degradations have not been
assessed, yet. This is particularly important, since in real-world face
recognition applications, images may contain various kinds of degradations due
to motion blur, noise, compression artifacts, color distortions, and occlusion.
In this work, we have addressed this problem and analyzed the influence of
these image degradations on the performance of deep CNN-based face recognition
approaches using the standard LFW closed-set identification protocol. We have
evaluated three popular deep CNN models, namely, the AlexNet, VGG-Face, and
GoogLeNet. Results have indicated that blur, noise, and occlusion cause a
significant decrease in performance, while deep CNN models are found to be
robust to distortions, such as color distortions and change in color balance.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure
Surgical Phase Recognition: From Public Datasets to Real-World Data
Automated recognition of surgical phases is a prerequisite for computer-assisted analysis of surgeries. The research on phase recognition has been mostly driven by publicly available datasets of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap Chole) videos. Yet, videos observed in real-world settings might contain challenges, such as additional phases and longer videos, which may be missing in curated public datasets. In this work, we study (i) the possible data distribution discrepancy between videos observed in a given medical center and videos from existing public datasets, and (ii) the potential impact of this distribution difference on model development. To this end, we gathered a large, private dataset of 384 Lap Chole videos. Our dataset contained all videos, including emergency surgeries and teaching cases, recorded in a continuous time frame of five years. We observed strong differences between our dataset and the most commonly used public dataset for surgical phase recognition, Cholec80. For instance, our videos were much longer, included additional phases, and had more complex transitions between phases. We further trained and compared several state-of-the-art phase recognition models on our dataset. The models’ performances greatly varied across surgical phases and videos. In particular, our results highlighted the challenge of recognizing extremely under- represented phases (usually missing in public datasets); the major phases were recognized with at least 76 percent recall. Overall, our results highlighted the need to better understand the distribution of the video data phase that recognition models are trained on
Comparative validation of machine learning algorithms for surgical workflow and skill analysis with the HeiChole benchmark
Purpose: Surgical workflow and skill analysis are key technologies for the next generation of cognitive surgical assistance systems. These systems could increase the safety of the operation through context-sensitive warnings and semi-autonomous robotic assistance or improve training of surgeons via data-driven feedback. In surgical workflow analysis up to 91% average precision has been reported for phase recognition on an open data single-center video dataset. In this work we investigated the generalizability of phase recognition algorithms in a multicenter setting including more difficult recognition tasks such as surgical action and surgical skill.
Methods: To achieve this goal, a dataset with 33 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from three surgical centers with a total operation time of 22 h was created. Labels included framewise annotation of seven surgical phases with 250 phase transitions, 5514 occurences of four surgical actions, 6980 occurences of 21 surgical instruments from seven instrument categories and 495 skill classifications in five skill dimensions. The dataset was used in the 2019 international Endoscopic Vision challenge, sub-challenge for surgical workflow and skill analysis. Here, 12 research teams trained and submitted their machine learning algorithms for recognition of phase, action, instrument and/or skill assessment.
Results: F1-scores were achieved for phase recognition between 23.9% and 67.7% (n = 9 teams), for instrument presence detection between 38.5% and 63.8% (n = 8 teams), but for action recognition only between 21.8% and 23.3% (n = 5 teams). The average absolute error for skill assessment was 0.78 (n = 1 team).
Conclusion: Surgical workflow and skill analysis are promising technologies to support the surgical team, but there is still room for improvement, as shown by our comparison of machine learning algorithms. This novel HeiChole benchmark can be used for comparable evaluation and validation of future work. In future studies, it is of utmost importance to create more open, high-quality datasets in order to allow the development of artificial intelligence and cognitive robotics in surgery
Surgical Phase Recognition: From Public Datasets to Real-World Data
Automated recognition of surgical phases is a prerequisite for computer-assisted analysis of surgeries. The research on phase recognition has been mostly driven by publicly available datasets of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap Chole) videos. Yet, videos observed in real-world settings might contain challenges, such as additional phases and longer videos, which may be missing in curated public datasets. In this work, we study (i) the possible data distribution discrepancy between videos observed in a given medical center and videos from existing public datasets, and (ii) the potential impact of this distribution difference on model development. To this end, we gathered a large, private dataset of 384 Lap Chole videos. Our dataset contained all videos, including emergency surgeries and teaching cases, recorded in a continuous time frame of five years. We observed strong differences between our dataset and the most commonly used public dataset for surgical phase recognition, Cholec80. For instance, our videos were much longer, included additional phases, and had more complex transitions between phases. We further trained and compared several state-of-the-art phase recognition models on our dataset. The models’ performances greatly varied across surgical phases and videos. In particular, our results highlighted the challenge of recognizing extremely under-represented phases (usually missing in public datasets); the major phases were recognized with at least 76 percent recall. Overall, our results highlighted the need to better understand the distribution of the video data phase recognition models are trained on
Author Correction: Automation of surgical skill assessment using a three-stage machine learning algorithm.
Automation of surgical skill assessment using a three-stage machine learning algorithm
Surgical skills are associated with clinical outcomes. To improve surgical skills and thereby reduce adverse outcomes, continuous surgical training and feedback is required. Currently, assessment of surgical skills is a manual and time-consuming process which is prone to subjective interpretation. This study aims to automate surgical skill assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos using machine learning algorithms. To address this, a three-stage machine learning method is proposed: first, a Convolutional Neural Network was trained to identify and localize surgical instruments. Second, motion features were extracted from the detected instrument localizations throughout time. Third, a linear regression model was trained based on the extracted motion features to predict surgical skills. This three-stage modeling approach achieved an accuracy of 87 ± 0.2% in distinguishing good versus poor surgical skill. While the technique cannot reliably quantify the degree of surgical skill yet it represents an important advance towards automation of surgical skill assessment
Comparative validation of multi-instance instrument segmentation in endoscopy: Results of the ROBUST-MIS 2019 challenge
Intraoperative tracking of laparoscopic instruments is often a prerequisite for computer and roboticassisted interventions. While numerous methods for detecting, segmenting and tracking of medical instruments based on endoscopic video images have been proposed in the literature, key limitations remain to be addressed: Firstly, robustness, that is, the reliable performance of state-of-the-art methods when run on challenging images (e.g. in the presence of blood, smoke or motion artifacts). Secondly, generalization; algorithms trained for a specific intervention in a specific hospital should generalize to other
interventions or institutions.
In an effort to promote solutions for these limitations, we organized the Robust Medical Instrument Segmentation (ROBUST-MIS) challenge as an international benchmarking competition with a specific focus
on the robustness and generalization capabilities of algorithms. For the first time in the field of endoscopic image processing, our challenge included a task on binary segmentation and also addressed multiinstance detection and segmentation. The challenge was based on a surgical data set comprising 10,040
annotated images acquired from a total of 30 surgical procedures from three different types of surgery.
The validation of the competing methods for the three tasks (binary segmentation, multi-instance detection and multi-instance segmentation) was performed in three different stages with an increasing domain
gap between the training and the test data. The results confirm the initial hypothesis, namely that algorithm performance degrades with an increasing domain gap. While the average detection and segmentation quality of the best-performing algorithms is high, future research should concentrate on detection
and segmentation of small, crossing, moving and transparent instrument(s) (parts)