Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify existing outcome measures for functional neurological disorder (FND), to inform the development of recommendations and to guide future research on FND outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND-specific outcome measures and the most common measurement domains and measures in previous treatment studies. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were conducted between January 1965 and June 2019. The findings were discussed during two international meetings of the FND-Core Outcome Measures group. RESULTS: Five FND-specific measures were identified-three clinician-rated and two patient-rated-but their measurement properties have not been rigorously evaluated. No single measure was identified for use across the range of FND symptoms in adults. Across randomised controlled trials (k=40) and observational treatment studies (k=40), outcome measures most often assessed core FND symptom change. Other domains measured commonly were additional physical and psychological symptoms, life impact (ie, quality of life, disability and general functioning) and health economics/cost-utility (eg, healthcare resource use and quality-adjusted life years). CONCLUSIONS: There are few well-validated FND-specific outcome measures. Thus, at present, we recommend that existing outcome measures, known to be reliable, valid and responsive in FND or closely related populations, are used to capture key outcome domains. Increased consistency in outcome measurement will facilitate comparison of treatment effects across FND symptom types and treatment modalities. Future work needs to more rigorously validate outcome measures used in this population

Research, education and capacity building priorities for violence, abuse and mental health in low- and middle-income countries: an international qualitative survey

Purpose Despite the World Health Organization and United Nations recognising violence, abuse and mental health as public health priorities, their intersection is under-studied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). International violence, abuse and mental health network (iVAMHN) members recognised the need to identify barriers and priorities to develop this field. Methods Informed by collaborative discussion between iVAMHN members, we conducted a pilot study using an online survey to identify research, education and capacity building priorities for violence, abuse and mental health in LMICs. We analysed free-text responses using thematic analysis. Results 35 senior (29%) and junior researchers (29%), non-government or voluntary sector staff (18%), health workers (11%), students (11%) and administrators (3%) completed the survey. Respondents worked in 24 LMICs, with 20% working in more than one country. Seventy-four percent of respondents worked in sub-Saharan Africa, 37% in Asia and smaller proportions in Latin America, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Respondents described training, human resource, funding and sensitivity-related barriers to researching violence, abuse and mental health in LMICs and recommended a range of actions to build capacity, streamline research pathways, increase efficiency and foster collaborations and co-production. Conclusion The intersection between violence, abuse and mental health in LMICs is a priority for individuals with a range of expertise across health, social care and the voluntary sector. There is interest in and support for building a strong network of parties engaged in research, service evaluation, training and education in this field. Networks like iVAMHN can act as hubs, bringing together diverse stakeholders for collaboration, co-production and mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and skills

Psychiatric Morbidity and Its Prognosis in Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinically and radiologically diagnosed disorder distinguished by subcortical vasogenic cerebral edema. To date, its presentation has been described through summarized neurological categories, such as seizures, headaches, "confusion," and "altered mental function." This retrospective case series identified all cases of clinically confirmed, radiologically diagnosed PRES resulting in treatment in a large teaching hospital from 2010 to 2019. The authors conducted a search for the term "reversible encephalopathy" in the hospital clinical radiology information system, followed by an audit of scan reports and clinical records. The most common reasons for psychiatric referral were addictions, acute psychosis, depression, suicidality, and treatment refusal. Multidisciplinary staff should consider PRES as a rare, organic differential diagnosis for acute mental state changes. Physicians should be aware of elevated rates of post-PRES psychiatric symptoms and consider whether psychiatric consultation may enhance recovery

De-escalation techniques in various settings

Introduction. Severe mental disorders represent a risk factor for violent episodes. Aggressiveness and violence can be expressed verbally or behaviorally, and aggression events may occur in different clinical settings during any stage of mental disorder’s course. We sought to define a set of communication techniques and guidelines in order to improve prevention and reduce aggressive and violent episodes’ damage risk in mental healthcare. De-escalation is conceived as a process comprising the ability to gradually resolve a potentially violent situation. It consists of different steps of communication, both verbal and nonverbal, aimed to defuse a potentially violent situation. Neurobiological correlates. De-escalation acts on potential aggressive manifestations which are influenced by common neurophysiological underpinnings: these neurobiological correlates involve the HPA axis (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) which is strongly associated with stress reaction, leading to a profound cortisol release and activation of neurotransmitter pathways and hormonal systems. Techniques and methods. Structured procedures involving different communication techniques, based on specific clinical needs, are required. De-escalation is intended to interrupt emotional activation, to establish a relationship with the agitated individual, and to provide the opportunity to resettle a functional emotional management. Conclusions. Dysfunctional conducts and aggressive behaviors may arise from mental health issues. Mental health operators should develop communication techniques and de-escalation abilities aimed to effectively manage critical situations and prevent critical interactions or physical aggression