Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis

Background Appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency worldwide, but its diagnosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to determine whether existing risk prediction models can reliably identify patients presenting to hospital in the UK with acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain who are at low risk of appendicitis. Methods A systematic search was completed to identify all existing appendicitis risk prediction models. Models were validated using UK data from an international prospective cohort study that captured consecutive patients aged 16–45 years presenting to hospital with acute RIF in March to June 2017. The main outcome was best achievable model specificity (proportion of patients who did not have appendicitis correctly classified as low risk) whilst maintaining a failure rate below 5 per cent (proportion of patients identified as low risk who actually had appendicitis). Results Some 5345 patients across 154 UK hospitals were identified, of which two‐thirds (3613 of 5345, 67·6 per cent) were women. Women were more than twice as likely to undergo surgery with removal of a histologically normal appendix (272 of 964, 28·2 per cent) than men (120 of 993, 12·1 per cent) (relative risk 2·33, 95 per cent c.i. 1·92 to 2·84; P < 0·001). Of 15 validated risk prediction models, the Adult Appendicitis Score performed best (cut‐off score 8 or less, specificity 63·1 per cent, failure rate 3·7 per cent). The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score performed best for men (cut‐off score 2 or less, specificity 24·7 per cent, failure rate 2·4 per cent). Conclusion Women in the UK had a disproportionate risk of admission without surgical intervention and had high rates of normal appendicectomy. Risk prediction models to support shared decision‐making by identifying adults in the UK at low risk of appendicitis were identified

Sex differences in (+)-amphetamine- and (+)-methamphetamine-induced behavioral response in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats

(+)-Methamphetamine (METH) and (+)-amphetamine (AMP) are structurally similar drugs that are reported to induce similar pharmacological effects in rats of the same sex. Because pharmacokinetic data suggest female rats should be more affected than males, the current studies sought to test the hypothesis that the behavioral and temporal actions of METH and AMP should be greater in female Sprague-Dawley rats than in males. Using a dosing regimen designed to reduce the possibility of tolerance and sensitization, rats were administered 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg intravenous drug doses. Distance traveled, rearing events and focal stereotypies (e.g., head weaving, sniffing) were measured. Female rats traveled significantly greater distances and displayed a greater number of rearing events than males after both doses. Analysis of stereotypy ratings after 3.0 mg/kg revealed that focal stereotypies were more pronounced and lasted longer in females. The second study compared the potencies of METH and AMP in inducing locomotor activity and focal stereotypies in each sex. No differences in potency were found when METH and AMP effects were compared within males or females. In summary, these studies showed female rats displayed greater and longer-lasting locomotor activity and more stereotypic behaviors, supporting earlier evidence of significant sexual dimorphism in pharmacokinetics

Use of anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibody to significantly alter (+)-methamphetamine and (+)-amphetamine disposition in rats

These studies examined the effects of a high-affinity anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibody (mAb; KD = 11 nM) on (+)-methamphetamine [(+)-METH] and (+)-amphetamine [(+)-AMP] serum and tissue disposition and serum protein binding following i.v. (+)-METH administration. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated with a buffer solution (control rats) or with anti-(+)-METH mAb [equimolar in binding sites to the (+)-METH dose]. The next day, both groups received a 1 mg/kg i.v. (+)-METH dose. At various time points after (+)-METH administration, rats were sacrificed (n = 3 per time point), and serum and tissues were collected. (+)-METH serum protein binding was increased from approximately 5% in controls to approximately 88 to 99% in the mAb-treated rats. The (+)-METH area under the concentration versus time curves from 0 to 4.5 h (AUC0-4.5 h) in mAb-treated rats showed an increase of >6600% for serum and a decrease of >60% for brain, compared with buffer-treated controls. Differential effects of anti-METH mAb on (+)-METH concentrations were observed in other tissues. For example, in the liver, anti-(+)-METH mAb caused significant increases in (+)-METH concentrations. The AUC0-4.5 h for (+)-AMP, a pharmacologically active metabolite, was decreased by approximately 50% in all tissues examined. These data show that pretreatment with an anti-(+)-METH mAb can significantly alter the disposition of (+)-METH and (+)-AMP in rats. Since the mAb has no significant cross-reactivity with (+)-AMP, the data suggest that the mAb reduced (+)-METH metabolic clearance through high-affinity binding to (+)-METH. Finally, rapidly equilibrating tissues, like the brain, appear to be preferentially protected by the mAb

Modulation of the pharmacokinetics of soluble ACE2 decoy receptors through glycosylation

The Spike of SARS-CoV-2 recognizes a transmembrane protease, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), on host cells to initiate infection. Soluble derivatives of ACE2, in which Spike affinity is enhanced and the protein is fused to Fc of an immunoglobulin, are potent decoy receptors that reduce disease in animal models of COVID-19. Mutations were introduced into an ACE2 decoy receptor, including adding custom N-glycosylation sites and a cavity-filling substitution together with Fc modifications, which increased the decoy’s catalytic activity and provided small to moderate enhancements of pharmacokinetics following intravenous and subcutaneous administration in humanized FcRn mice. Most prominently, sialylation of native glycans increases exposures by orders of magnitude, and the optimized decoy is therapeutically efficacious in a mouse COVID-19 model. Ultimately, an engineered and highly sialylated decoy receptor produced using methods suitable for manufacture of representative drug substance has high exposure with a 5- to 9-day half-life. Finally, peptide epitopes at mutated sites in the decoys generally have low binding to common HLA class II alleles and the predicted immunogenicity risk is low. Overall, glycosylation is a critical molecular attribute of ACE2 decoy receptors and modifications that combine tighter blocking of Spike with enhanced pharmacokinetics elevate this class of molecules as viable drug candidates