25 research outputs found
Common dace (Leuciscus leuciscus) - A new host of the myxozoan fish parasite, Myxobolus elegans (Cnidaria: Myxozoa) - Short communication
This paper reports the detection of the myxozoan species Myxobolus elegans Kashkovsky 1966 in common dace (Leuciscus leuciscus) that has not been previously listed as its host. The problem of differentiation of phenotypically similar Myxobolus species is addressed. During parasitological survey of common dace from the desalinated part of the Gulf of Finland at the city of Sestroretsk, Russia, numerous oval-shaped plasmodia, 0.2-0.4 mm in size, filled with Myxobolus spores were found on the gills. Pear-shaped myxospores were 15.4 (14.8-16.0) x 10.2 (9.6-10.9) mu m in size with a rib on each valve. On the basis of spore morphology, the species appeared to be similar to M. elegans and Myxobolus hungaricus Jaczo, 1940. In order to identify the species, molecular genetic analysis was performed, and the species was identified on the basis of morphological characteristics and 18S rDNA data. The results obtained indicate that the Myxobolus species observed on the gills of dace is M. elegans. Thus, common dace is another valid host of M. elegans besides the type host, ide (Leuciscus idus)
Morphological Differentiation, Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Variability Between Geographically Distant Populations of Daphnia galeata and Daphnia cucullata (Anomopoda, Daphniidae)
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Ρ. Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π·Π°ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 ΠΈ Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862
(Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ - ΠΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΠ²Π° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ,
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ) ΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ).
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ². Π‘Π°ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ
Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ. Π Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π°
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 16S ΠΈ 12S Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ITS2 ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ.
ΠΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ D. galeata ΠΈ D. cucullata Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ
Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅.Although members of genus Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) are the most common water
invertebrates and are considered as model organisms for many taxonomic, ecological and
evolutionary studies their systematics remains unresolved. Here, morphological differentiation
and genetic polymorphism between the geographically distant populations of the sister species
Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 and Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862 in the Curonian Lagoon, a large
shallow freshwater lagoon of the Baltic Sea (Russia, Kaliningrad Oblast) and Novosibirsk Reservoir
(Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast) are presented. The divergence between species and their populations
was analyzed based on traditional morphological traits and a large set of morphometric traits
describing the body shape. The traits describing the shape of head and helmet, and spine were the
most variable morphological characters. Phylogenetic relationships between species and populations
were constructed based on variation in mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes and nuclear ITS2
rDNA sequences. The mitochondrial DNA divergence between D. galeata and D. cucullata species
was significant and reflected their monophyletic origin, whereas intraspecific genetic distances are
estimated as insignificant
Evidence of dispersal between the Yenisei and the Lena river basins during the late Pleistocene within the whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus pidschian) complex
The Coregonus lavaretus (Linnaeus, 1758) complex is a morphologically and genetically diverse group of whitefish. Its taxonomic structure has been controversial for almost a century. At least 25 forms of C. lavaretus have been described in Siberia, but there is still no consensus on their intraspecific structure and taxonomy. Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (Gmelin, 1789) was described as a subspecies of C. lavaretus. Recently, it was assumed that this subspecies is also a complex. The purpose of this study was to compare the distributions of pidschian-like whitefish haplotypes in two basins of large Siberian rivers, Yenisei and Lena, and to assess the gene flow between basins of these rivers, which were connected after the last glaciation. The sequence of the following mitochondrial DNA genes, 16S rRNA (partial), tRNA-Leu (full), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (full), tRNA-Ile (full), and tRNA-Gln (partial), were used for the inference of intraspecific genetic structure of C. l. pidschian. Whitefish haplotypes were clustered into two groups according to their distribution between two large Siberian river basins; however, there were shared haplotypes indicating events of migration and hybridization, which could occur when Bolshoi Yenisei and Lena river systems were connected after the last glaciation (the Late Pleistocene).info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersio
Morphological Differentiation, Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Variability Between Geographically Distant Populations of Daphnia galeata and Daphnia cucullata (Anomopoda, Daphniidae)
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Ρ. Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π·Π°ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 ΠΈ Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862
(Anomopoda, Daphniidae) ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ°Π»ΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡ - ΠΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΠ²Π° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ,
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ) ΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° (Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ, ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ).
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ². Π‘Π°ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Ρ, ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ
Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ. Π Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π°
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ 16S ΠΈ 12S Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ITS2 ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ.
ΠΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ D. galeata ΠΈ D. cucullata Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ½Π΄ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ
Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅.Although members of genus Daphnia (Anomopoda, Daphniidae) are the most common water
invertebrates and are considered as model organisms for many taxonomic, ecological and
evolutionary studies their systematics remains unresolved. Here, morphological differentiation
and genetic polymorphism between the geographically distant populations of the sister species
Daphnia galeata Sars, 1864 and Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862 in the Curonian Lagoon, a large
shallow freshwater lagoon of the Baltic Sea (Russia, Kaliningrad Oblast) and Novosibirsk Reservoir
(Russia, Novosibirsk Oblast) are presented. The divergence between species and their populations
was analyzed based on traditional morphological traits and a large set of morphometric traits
describing the body shape. The traits describing the shape of head and helmet, and spine were the
most variable morphological characters. Phylogenetic relationships between species and populations
were constructed based on variation in mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes and nuclear ITS2
rDNA sequences. The mitochondrial DNA divergence between D. galeata and D. cucullata species
was significant and reflected their monophyletic origin, whereas intraspecific genetic distances are
estimated as insignificant
List of conserved miRNAs identified in three Opisthorchiidae species.
<p>List of conserved miRNAs identified in three Opisthorchiidae species.</p
Identification of microRNA Genes in Three Opisthorchiids
<div><p>Background</p><p><i>Opisthorchis felineus</i>, <i>O</i>. <i>viverrini</i>, and <i>Clonorchis sinensis</i> (family Opisthorchiidae) are parasitic flatworms that pose a serious threat to humans in some countries and cause opisthorchiasis/clonorchiasis. Chronic disease may lead to a risk of carcinogenesis in the biliary ducts. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that control gene expression at post-transcriptional level and are implicated in the regulation of various cellular processes during the parasite- host interplay. However, to date, the miRNAs of opisthorchiid flukes, in particular those essential for maintaining their complex biology and parasitic mode of existence, have not been satisfactorily described.</p><p>Methodology/Principal Findings</p><p>Using a SOLiD deep sequencing-bioinformatic approach, we identified 43 novel and 18 conserved miRNAs for <i>O</i>. <i>felineus</i> (miracidia, metacercariae and adult worms), 20 novel and 16 conserved miRNAs for <i>O</i>. <i>viverrini</i> (adult worms), and 33 novel and 18 conserved miRNAs for <i>C</i>. <i>sinensis</i> (adult worms). The analysis of the data revealed differences in the expression level of conserved miRNAs among the three species and among three the developmental stages of <i>O</i>. <i>felineus</i>. Analysis of miRNA genes revealed two gene clusters, one cluster-like region and one intronic miRNA in the genome. The presence and structure of the two gene clusters were validated using a PCR-based approach in the three flukes.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study represents a comprehensive description of miRNAs in three members of the family Opistorchiidae, significantly expands our knowledge of miRNAs in multicellular parasites and provides a basis for understanding the structural and functional evolution of miRNAs in these metazoan parasites. Results of this study also provides novel resources for deeper understanding the complex parasite biology, for further research on the pathogenesis and molecular events of disease induced by the liver flukes. The present data may also facilitate the development of novel approaches for the prevention and treatment of opisthorchiasis/clonorchiasis.</p></div
Genomic organization scheme of cluster-like regions miR-1/miR-133 in five flatworms.
<p>Designations are the same as in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003680#pntd.0003680.g003" target="_blank">Fig 3</a>.</p
Venn diagrams of the miRNAs sets.
<p>(A) conserved miRNAs in three opisthorchiid species, (B) O. <i>felineus</i> conserved miRNAs at different developmental stages, (C) novel miRNAs in the three opisthorchiid species, (D) O. <i>felineus</i> novel miRNAs at different developmental stages.</p
List of conserved miRNAs identified in different samples of <i>O</i>. <i>felineus</i>.
<p>List of conserved miRNAs identified in different samples of <i>O</i>. <i>felineus</i>.</p
Scheme of miRNA gene clusters in Platyhelminthes.
<p>(A) miR-71a/2 cluster group, (B) miR-71b/2 cluster group. Species designations: csiβC. sinensis, smaβS. mansoni, sjaβS. japonicum, smeβS. mediterranea, hmiβH. microstoma, egrβE. granulosus, emuβE. multilocularis, gsa- G. salaris.</p