Improving kidney care for people with severe mental health difficulties: a thematic analysis of twenty-two healthcare providers’ perspectives

IntroductionPeople with severe mental health difficulties (SMHDs) and concurrent kidney disease have less access to quality kidney care and worse clinical outcomes. Our research investigates the barriers and facilitators to effective kidney care for people with SMHDs, and how care might be improved for this underserved population.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty-two physical (n = 14) and mental (n = 8) healthcare professionals with experience working with people with SMHDs and concurrent kidney disease. Interview data were analysed and interpreted using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsFour themes were generated from the data: 1. “It’s about understanding their limitations and challenges, without limiting their rights” describes how some people with SMHDs need additional support when accessing kidney care due to challenges with their mental state, motivation, cognitive difficulties, or mistrust of the healthcare system. 2. “There are people falling through the cracks” describes how the separation of physical and mental healthcare, combined with under-resourcing and understaffing, results in poorer outcomes for people with SMHDs. 3. “Psychiatry is a black spot in our continuing medical education” describes how many renal healthcare providers have limited confidence in their understanding of mental health and their ability to provide care for people with SMHDs. 4. “When they present to a busy emergency department with a problem, the staff tend to go ‘…psych patient”” describes how stigma towards people with SMHDs can negatively impact quality of care.ConclusionHealthcare professionals accounts’ describe how people with SMHDs and kidney disease can have favourable outcomes if they have appropriate hospital, community and social supports. Findings indicate that effective management of kidney disease for people with SMHDs requires integrated physical and mental health care, which takes an individualised “whole person” approach to addressing the interaction between kidney disease and mental health

Postpartum evaluation of cardiovascular disease risk for women with pregnancies complicated by hypertension

Objectives: Postpartum stratification of cardiovascular risk for women with pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia is challenging. Our aim was to identify potential clinical and biomarker predictors of future cardiovascular risk at six weeks postpartum in women with hypertensive pregnancies. Study design: Prospective longitudinal cohort. Main outcome measures: Ten year-Framingham cardiovascular risk scores were calculated for 477 women (94 with gestational hypertension, 288 with pre-eclampsia, 30 with superimposed pre-eclampsia, 51 with chronic hypertension, 14 women with uncomplicated pregnancies). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin (NGAL) and placental growth factor (PlGF) were quantified at six weeks postpartum. Results: Framingham cardiovascular risk scores were not higher in women with pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia than healthy controls, nor were scores higher in women with pre-existing chronic hypertension complicated with superimposed pre-eclampsia compared with those without superimposed pre-eclampsia. Women with gestational hypertension had higher risk scores than women with pre-eclampsia and healthy controls. Established risk factors of cardiovascular disease including diastolic blood pressure and previously diagnosed chronic hypertension were associated with higher scores, and African ethnicity, parity and estimated glomerular filtration rate also were independently associated with higher Framingham risk scores at six weeks postpartum. PlGF, BNP and NGAL concentrations were not associated with Framingham cardiovascular risk scores after adjustment for independent variables. Conclusions: A history of pre-eclampsia or superimposed pre-eclampsia in most recent pregnancy was not associated with elevated Framingham risk score at six weeks postpartum. Established clinical predictors may enable risk stratification at six weeks postpartum, which are not enhanced by the biomarkers included in this study

Urinary congophilia in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preexisting proteinuria or hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Congophilia indicates the presence of amyloid protein, which is an aggregate of misfolded proteins, that is implicated in the pathophysiologic condition of preeclampsia. Recently, urinary congophilia has been proposed as a test for the diagnosis and prediction of preeclampsia. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether urine congophilia is present in a cohort of women with preeclampsia and in pregnant and nonpregnant women with renal disease. STUDY DESIGN: With the use of a preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, renal disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus cohort, we analyzed urine samples from healthy pregnant control subjects (n = 31) and pregnant women with preeclampsia (n = 23), gestational hypertension (n = 10), chronic hypertension (n = 14), chronic kidney disease; n = 28), chronic kidney disease with superimposed preeclampsia (n = 5), and chronic hypertension and superimposed preeclampsia (n = 12). Samples from nonpregnant control subjects (n = 10) and nonpregnant women with either systemic lupus erythematosus with (n = 25) and without (n = 14) lupus nephritis were analyzed. For each sample, protein concentration was standardized before it was mixed with Congo Red, spotted to nitrocellulose membrane, and rinsed with methanol. The optical density of the residual Congo Red stain was determined; Congo red stain retention was calculated, and groups were compared with the use of the Mann-Whitney test or Kruskal-Wallis analysis of Variance test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Congophilia was increased in urine from women with preeclampsia (median Congo red stain retention, 47%; interquartile range, 22-68%) compared with healthy pregnant control subjects (Congo red stain retention: 16%; interquartile range, 13-21%; P = .002), women with gestational hypertension (Congo red stain retention, 20%; interquartile range, 13-27%; P = .008), or women with chronic hypertension (Congo red stain retention, 17%; interquartile range, 12-28%; P = .01). There were no differences in Congo red retention between pregnant women with chronic hypertension and normal pregnant control subjects (Congo red stain retention, 17% [interquartile range, 12-28%] vs 16% [interquartile range, 13-21%], respectively; P = .72). Congophilia was present in pregnant women with chronic kidney disease (Congo red stain retention, 32%; interquartile range, 14-57%), being similar to values found in women with preeclampsia (P = .22) and for women with chronic kidney disease and superimposed preeclampsia (Congo red stain retention, 57%; [interquartile range, 29-71%; P = .18). Nonpregnant women with lupus nephritis had higher congophilia levels compared with nonpregnant female control subjects (Congo red stain retention, 38% [interquartile range, 17-73%] vs 9% [7-11%], respectively; P < .001) and nonpregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus without nephritis (Congo red stain retention, 38% [interquartile range, 17-73%] vs 13% [interquartile range, 11-17%], respectively; P = .001). A significant positive correlation was observed between congophilia and protein:creatinine ratio (Spearman rank correlations, 0.702; 95% confidence interval, 0.618-0.770; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that women with preeclampsia and chronic kidney disease without preeclampsia have elevated urine congophilia levels compared with healthy pregnant women. Nonpregnant women with lupus nephritis also have elevated urine congophilia levels compared with healthy control subjects. An elevated Congo Red stain retention may not be able to differentiate between these conditions; further research is required to explore the use of congophilia in clinical practice.National Institute for Health ResearchThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.04

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in women of reproductive age and observed birth rates

INTRODUCTION: Women of reproductive age with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are recognised to have decreased fertility and a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. How often CKD afflicts women of reproductive age is not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the burden of CKD and associated birth rates in an entire region.METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including women of childbearing age in Stockholm during 2006-2015. We estimated the prevalence of "probable CKD" by the presence of an ICD-10 diagnosis of CKD, a single estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or history of maintenance dialysis. By linkage with the Swedish Medical Birth Register we identified births during the subsequent three years from study inclusion and evaluated birth rates.RESULTS: We identified 817,730 women in our region, of whom 55% had at least one creatinine measurement. A total of 3938 women were identified as having probable CKD, providing an age-averaged CKD prevalence of 0.50%. Women with probable CKD showed a lower birth rate 3 years after the index date (35.7 children per 1000 person years) than the remaining women free from CKD (46.5 children per 1000 person years).CONCLUSION: As many as 0.50% of individuals in this cohort had probable CKD, defined on the basis of at least one eGFR&lt;60 ml/min1.73 m2 test result, dialysis treatment (i.e. CKD stages 3-5) or an ICD-10 diagnosis of CKD. This prevalence is lower than previous estimates. Women with probable CKD, according to a study mainly capturing CKD 3-5, had a lower birth rate than those without CKD, illustrating the challenges of this population to successfully conceive.</p

Pregnancy outcomes in liver and cardiothoracic transplant recipients:a UK national cohort study

There are an increasing number of reports of pregnancy in transplant recipients but many questions remain regarding the effect of the transplant on pregnancy outcome, the pregnancy on the graft and the medication on the fetus. The majority of studies reporting outcomes in transplant recipients have focused on women with kidney transplants, and have included retrospective, voluntary registries or single centre studies.The UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) was used to prospectively identify all pregnant women with a liver or cardiothoracic transplant in the United Kingdom, between January 2007 and January 2012. Data were collected on demographics, transplant characteristics, immunosuppression regimens, antenatal care, maternal, graft and neonatal outcomes. In an exploratory analysis, we tested for associations between "poor fetal outcome" and medications used before or during pregnancy.We report 62 pregnancies in 56 liver transplant recipients and 14 pregnancies in 14 cardiothoracic transplant recipients (including 10 heart, three lung and one heart-lung recipient). Liver transplant recipients, in comparison to cardiothoracic, had similar livebirth rates (92% vs. 87%) but better fetal outcomes (median gestational age 38 weeks vs. 35 weeks; median birthweight 2698 g vs. 2365 g), fewer caesarean deliveries (47% vs. 62%), fewer maternal intensive care (ICU) admissions (19% vs. 29%) and fewer neonatal ICU admissions (25% vs. 54%). Nine women (12%) were taking mycophenolate mofetil at conception, which was associated with adverse fetal outcomes. Pregnancy in transplant recipients may have successful outcomes, but complication rates are high, emphasising the role of pre-conception counselling and further research into the long-term effect on maternal and graft survival rates

The rapid development of a novel kidney-specific digital intervention for self-management of physical activity and emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Kidney Beam

King's College Hospital; Kidney Research UK; Beam; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under (NIHR301893), (NIHR301593), and (ICA-CL-2017-03-020)