Natural Order, Social Order, Political Legitimacy, and the Sacred City: The Architecture of Teotihuacan

In this collection, prominent scholars provide new interpretations and useful syntheses of many of the most significant Mesoamerican architectural traditions from the Preclassic to the Postclassic periods. The essays examine the built environment as a carrier of cultural meanings. The many pyramid-temples, palaces, and ballcourts comprising Mesoamerican centers were constructed in the context of hierarchical societies, and provided monumental expressions of elite authority. The design of individual buildings, as well as the layout of site plans, often embodied Mesoamerican beliefs about the structure of the cosmos, natural forces, or the numinous power of landscape forms, thus providing sanction for the sociopolitical order

Structure 16, Tulum, Quintana Roo

In this collection, prominent scholars provide new interpretations and useful syntheses of many of the most significant Mesoamerican architectural traditions from the Preclassic to the Postclassic periods. The essays examine the built environment as a carrier of cultural meanings. The many pyramid-temples, palaces, and ballcourts comprising Mesoamerican centers were constructed in the context of hierarchical societies, and provided monumental expressions of elite authority. The design of individual buildings, as well as the layout of site plans, often embodied Mesoamerican beliefs about the structure of the cosmos, natural forces, or the numinous power of landscape forms, thus providing sanction for the sociopolitical order

O período Epiclássico na Mesoamérica: implicações para a questão tolteca e o sítio arqueológico de Chichén Itz The Epiclassic period in Mesoamerica: implications to the toltec question and the archaeologycal site of Chichén Itzá

A Arqueologia de Chichén Itzá sugere que sua construção data fundamentalmente do período Clássico Terminal ou Epiclássico (700-950 d.C.), ao invés do Pós-Clássico Inicial (950-1100 d.C.). Esta afirmação chama a atenção para as implicações de cronologia para o muito conhecido problema tolteca. Estamos trabalhando com a premissa que a ocupação de Chichén Itzá é, em sua maior parte, anterior à fase Tollán de Tula (900-1200 d.C.), o que nos leva a crer que o que geralmente é identificado como iconografia tolteca e, portanto, de origem das terras altas centro-mexicanas, de fato data do horizonte Epiclássico.<br>The Archaeology of Chichén Itzá suggests that its construction fundamentally date of the period Classic Terminal or Epiclassic (700-950 AD), instead of the Post-Classic Periodo (950-1100 AD). This draws attention to the implications of chronology for the well known problem tolteca. We are working with the assumption that the occupation of Chichén Itzá is, in the most part, prior to the stage Tollán of Tula (900-1200 AD), which leads us to believe that what is usually identified as tolteca iconography and therefore uplands of origin of the center-Mexican, in fact date Epiclassic horizon