Matrix-comparative genomic hybridization from multicenter formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissue blocks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The identification of genomic signatures of colorectal cancer for risk stratification requires the study of large series of cancer patients with an extensive clinical follow-up. Multicentric clinical studies represent an ideal source of well documented archived material for this type of analyses.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To verify if this material is technically suitable to perform matrix-CGH, we performed a pilot study using macrodissected 29 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples collected within the framework of the EORTC-GI/PETACC-2 trial for colorectal cancer. The scientific aim was to identify prognostic genomic signatures differentiating locally restricted (UICC stages II-III) from systemically advanced (UICC stage IV) colorectal tumours.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The majority of archived tissue samples collected in the different centers was suitable to perform matrix-CGH. 5/7 advanced tumours displayed 13q-gain and 18q-loss. In locally restricted tumours, only 6/12 tumours showed a gain on 13q and 7/12 tumours showed a loss on 18q. Interphase-FISH and high-resolution array-mapping of the gain on 13q confirmed the validity of the array-data and narrowed the chromosomal interval containing potential oncogenes.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Archival, paraffin-embedded tissue samples collected in multicentric clinical trials are suitable for matrix-CGH analyses and allow the identification of prognostic signatures and aberrations harbouring potential new oncogenes.</p

Pooled Safety and Efficacy Analysis Examining the Effect of Performance Status on Outcomes in Nine First-Line Treatment Trials Using Individual Data From Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Performance status (PS) is a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical trials typically enroll less than 10% of patients with a PS of 2 (PS2); thus, the benefit of systemic chemotherapy in PS2 patients is uncertain

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Testing prior to Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil, Capecitabine, and Tegafur: A Consensus Paper

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2–1.0%. Summary: Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitorin

Palliative Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms

Die zytostatische Chemotherapie ist wesentlicher Bestandteil der palliativen Therapie von Patienten mit metastasiertem kolorektalen Karzinom. Gegenüber einer rein supportiven Behandlung verbessert eine auf 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) basierende Chemotherapie die Lebensqualität und verlängert das Überleben der Patienten. 5- FU-Dauerinfusion moduliert mit Folinsäure ist die beste Grundlage für die Kombination mit Irinotecan oder Oxaliplatin. Randomisierte Studien zum Einsatz von Irinotecan zeigten signifikante Vorteile im Hinblick auf die Remissionsrate, das progressionsfreie Überleben und auch die mediane Überlebenszeit. Randomisierte Studien zum Einsatz von Oxaliplatin zeigten ebenfalls höhere Remissionsraten und ein verlängertes progressionsfreies Überleben ohne eine verlängerte Überlebenszeit nachweisen zu können. Heutzutage sollten alle Patienten mit einer Kombinationschemotherapie behandelt werden und im Verlauf ihrer Erkrankung, soweit möglich, alle zur Verfügung stehenden Medikamente erhalten. Nur dadurch können mediane Überlebenszeiten von über 20 Monaten erreicht werden. Der Einsatz oraler Fluoropyrimidine statt einer 5-FU-Dauerinfusion in Kombination mit Irinotecan und Oxaliplatin ist viel versprechend, jedoch Gegenstand laufender Studien. Monoklonale Antikörper gegen den EGF-Rezeptor bzw. gegen VEGF haben ebenfalls viel versprechende Ergebnisse gezeigt und werden wahrscheinlich die Behandlungsmöglichkeiten in der Zukunft wesentlich verbessern.Systemic chemotherapy has a key role in the palliative treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Compared to best supportive care, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy prolongs survival and improves quality of life. 5-FU continuous infusion modulated by Leukovorin (LV) is the optimal basis for a combination therapy with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Randomized trials investigating the role of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/LV relative to 5-FU/LV alone demonstrated a significant improvement in the response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Randomized studies using oxaliplatin/ 5-FU/LV vs. FU/LV alone resulted in a higher response rate and longer progression-free survival while the overall survival was not significantly different. Today, all patients should receive combination treatment in first line and should be offered all active compounds during the course of their disease. Hereby, median survival times of more than 20 months are achievable. The use of oral fluoropyrimidines as a substitute of infusional 5-FU in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin is promising and subject of clinical trials. Monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGF-receptor or against VEGF have demonstrated interesting results and may be a treatment option in the future.Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich

Vinflunine in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer: clinical evidence and experience

Vinflunine (VFL) has been approved in Europe for second-line treatment of metastatic and advanced urothelial cancer after failure of platin-containing therapy. Since approval, the drug has been investigated in few clinical trials. Most of the currently available reports describe experiences with VFL in a daily clinical setting. This review gives a short overview on clinical experiences and clinical trials involving VFL since the approval of this drug in 2009

Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms

Purpose!#!Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).!##!Methods!#!Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years.!##!Results!#!The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC.!##!Conclusion!#!In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial

Expert opinion on management of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-gastrointestinal cancer group

A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for patients with gastric cancer. Patients should be managed by an experienced team of physicians. The outcome of patients is related to the experience of the multidisciplinary team. Surgery is the cornerstone of the management of patients with resectable gastric cancer. The standard recommendations for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma are free-margin surgery with at least D1 resection combined to removal of a minimum of 15 lymph nodes. It has been shown that the outcome of patients with resectable gastric cancer can be improved by a strategy of perioperative (pre- and postoperative) chemotherapy or by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. The evidence comes from large randomised phase 3 studies. In the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, no chemotherapy combination was accepted as the gold standard. Cisplatin/5-FU (CF) and ECF (epirubicin plus CF) regimens have been investigated widely in clinical studies and were until recently presented as the reference regimens. Despite a relative chemosensitivity of gastric cancer, a low rate of complete response was obtained, the response duration was short and patients' outcomes remained poor. Recently, new options have been introduced in the management of advanced gastric cancer. It has been shown that capecitabine is at least as good as 5-FU and that oxaliplatin at least as good as cisplatin in these combinations. It has also been demonstrated that the addition of docetaxel to CF resulted in statistically significant improved efficacy endpoints (including patient's quality of life), but also in an increased toxicity. The DCF regimen (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU) has become, therefore, a new active option in advanced gastric cancer in selected patients in good condition. Further randomised trials are therefore to be designed to further improve chemotherapy by modifying and optimising the chemotherapy regimens, and investigating novel treatment combinations. The addition of biological agents to the optimal chemotherapy regimen may achieve further improvements in efficacy