Refractory and relapsed paediatric ACC in the MET studies – a challenging situation necessitating novel diagnostic and therapeutic concepts

Background Paediatric adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are highly aggressive malignancies with a dismal prognosis in advanced and metastatic disease. Little is known about outcome of patients with refractory and relapsed (r/r) disease. Procedure National retrospective multicentre study including r/r ACC diagnosed in patients aged <18 years registered in the MET studies between January 1997 and December 2021 Results A total of 16 patients (5 male; median age 12.9 years) with refractory disease were included. Median time to progression was 0.6 years [0.0-1.3]. Site of progression was locoregional (n=1), distant (n=3), and combined (n=12). 3-year overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were both 0%. Thirty patients with relapse (11 male; median age 7.3 years) were identified. Median time to relapse was 0.7 years [0.1-3.2]. Site of relapse was locoregional (n=8), distant (n=15), and combined (n=7). At last follow-up, 20 patients had died of disease or complications or were alive with disease, 10 patients were in second complete remission (median follow-up: 6.8 years [0-10.5]). 3-year OS and PFS following relapse were 39.1% and 31.9%. Survival was superior in patients with distant relapse (59.6%) compared to locoregional (28.6%) and combined (14.3%) (p=0.028) and in patients with complete surgical resection of all sites of recurrence (70.0%) compared to incomplete (21.4%) and no surgery (0%) (p=0.003). Conclusions For patients nonresponsive to first-line therapy or who experience relapse, prognosis is dismal and options are scarce. Site of relapse and resectability define prognosis. Novel therapeutic concepts are needed to improve the outcome of paediatric patients with r/r ACC

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries