Trends in Gliosis in Obesity, and the Role of Antioxidants as a Therapeutic Alternative

Obesity remains a global health problem. Chronic low-grade inflammation in this pathology has been related to comorbidities such as cognitive alterations that, in the long term, can lead to neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroinflammation or gliosis in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus has been related to the effect of adipokines, high lipid levels and glucose, which increase the production of free radicals. Cerebral gliosis can be a risk factor for developing neurodegenerative diseases, and antioxidants could be an alternative for the prevention and treatment of neural comorbidities in obese patients. Aim: Identify the immunological and oxidative stress mechanisms that produce gliosis in patients with obesity and propose antioxidants as an alternative to reducing neuroinflammation. Method: Advanced searches were performed in scientific databases: PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, and the Science Citation index for research on the physiopathology of gliosis in obese patients and for the possible role of antioxidants in its management. Conclusion: Patients with obesity can develop neuroinflammation, conditioned by various adipokines, excess lipids and glucose, which results in an increase in free radicals that must be neutralized with antioxidants to reduce gliosis and the risk of long-term neurodegeneration

Effect of Norelgestromin and Ethinylestradiol in Transdermal Patches on the Clinical Outcomes and Biochemical Parameters of COVID-19 Patients: A Clinical Trial Pilot Study

The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 is still considered a global pandemic. Transdermal patches (TP) with immunoregulators such as estrogen and progesterone compounds could be a feasible option to treat COVID-19 because of their accessibility and relative safety. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the additional treatment with norelgestromin and ethinylestradiol in TP on the clinical and biochemical evolution of COVID-19 patients. The present is a clinical-trial pilot study that included subjects diagnosed with COVID-19, randomized into two groups; the experimental Evra® TP (norelgestromin 6 mg and ethinylestradiol 0.60 mg) was administered such that it was applied on arrival and replaced at day 8 and day 15. The control continued with the conventional COVID-19 treatment protocol. A blood sample was taken each week in order to evaluate relevant biochemical parameters, clinical signs, and evolution. In total, 44 subjects participated in this study, 30 in the experimental group and 14 in the control group. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of age and comorbidities. The experimental group had a significantly lower hospital stay (p = 0.01), high flow supplemental oxygen (p = 0.001), mechanical ventilation (p = 0.003), and intubation (p = 0.01), and the oxygen saturation significantly increased (p = 0.01) in comparison with control group when patients were exposed to room air. A decrease in ferritin (p < 0.05) was observed, with no significant increase in ESR (p > 0.05), D dimer (p > 0.05) and platelets (p > 0.05) in an auto-controlled analysis in the experimental group. Norelgestromin and ethinylestradiol TP could be a safe and effective treatment for moderate and severe COVID-19 patients

Valuación de inmuebles.

El INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL es una institución educativa laica, gratuita del Estado, rectora de la educación tecnológica pública en México, líder en la generación, aplicación, difusión y transferencia del conocimiento científico y tecnológico, creada para contribuir al desarrollo económico, social y político de la nación. Para lograrlo, el Instituto y su comunidad forman integralmente profesionales en los niveles medio superior, superior y posgrado, realiza investigación y extiende a la sociedad sus resultados, con calidad, responsabilidad, ética, tolerancia y compromiso social. La Escuela Superior de Ingeniería y Arquitectura Unidad Zacatenco, es una de las once escuelas superiores en el área de Ingeniería y Ciencias Físico-Matemáticas, del INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AimThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.MethodsThis was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.ResultsOverall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P ConclusionOne in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease