Teamwork enables high level of early mobilization in critically ill patients

Additional file 2. Physiological responses of physiotherapy session. Values expressed as mean ± standard deviation; IB = In bed, IC = In chair, * different from baseline, ≈ different from 0 min

Impact of additional HEPA filter on APAP performance and CPAP pressure level in simulated sleep apnea events

BackgroundCPAP is the first line treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Recently, the use of added filters has been debated following the field safety notice of Philips Respironics™ on potential health risks due to foam degradation used in their ventilators. However, the added resistance of filters has never been analyzed.ObjectivesThe primary aim was to investigate the impact of four different filters on APAP mode performance with and without added unintentional air leaks (UIAL) with two simulated respiratory events. The secondary aim was to assess the pressure drop due to the increased filter resistance at different fixed CPAP pressure levels.MethodThis is a bench study. Performance tests were performed on a breathing simulator (ASL 5000™) with a DreamStation™ device. To assess the combined effect of UIAL, a controlled valve was added to the setup.ResultsWithout UIAL, the algorithm was able to detect respiratory events and increase pressure level consequently. In the presence of UIAL, the device's response to simulated events was affected. In fixed CPAP mode, the median measured end-expiratory pressure was 6.2 to 10.0% (p < 0.001) below the set pressure with the additional filters. Additional UIAL severely impacted the delivered pressure with a median reduction up to 28.3% (p < 0.001) to the set pressure.ConclusionDespite a slight pressure drop, the APAP algorithm still performed with additional filters when UIAL were avoided. However, the combined effect of added filter resistance and UIAL severely impacted APAP performance and effectively delivered set pressure

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Aerosol delivery during invasive ventilation : an in vitro analysis and in vivo radioisotopic investigation

The objective of the thesis was to evaluate the aerosol delivery to the lungs with two ventilation modes (volume control vs pressure support mode) during invasive ventilation considering that the inspiratory flow pattern differ between both modes (constant vs decelerating flow pattern). Aerosol delivery with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer was assessed in vitro using the residual gravimetric method and in vivo using planar scintigraphy. Volume controlled ventilation was associated to higher lung doses of radiolabel delivered to ventilated patients (15 vs 10% of the initial dose) in comparison pressure support ventilation (lower and uncontrolled respiratory rate, higher inspiratory flow). It confirmed the interest to apply a constant inspiratory flow of 30 L/min to increase aerosol delivery suggested in vitro in comparison to a decelerating flow (peak of 60 L/min). There is a benefit to control the breathing pattern during the nebulization. However, a systematic review reported a lung deposition inferior to 20% of the initial dose in invasive ventilation. Further studies are needed to improve the administration technique.(MOTR - Sciences de la motricité) -- UCL, 201

Nasal High-Flow Nebulization for Lung Drug Delivery: Theoretical, Experimental, and Clinical Application.

The use of nasal high-flow (NHF) therapy is rapidly spreading across acute care facilities. This raises the question of optimal delivery of inhaled medication to patients undergoing this noninvasive ventilatory support consisting in delivering heated and humidified high gas flow rates through nasal cannulas. In this article, we review experimental and clinical work evaluating the delivery of inhaled medication within the NHF circuit to target the lung without interrupting the ventilatory support. Using vibrating mesh nebulizers placed immediately upstream or downstream of the humidification chamber, with flow rates of 30-45 L/min in adults and 2-6 L/min in children and infants, about 1%-10% of the drug charged in the nebulizer may be delivered to the lungs. Compared with conventional facemask aerosol interfaces, this amount is significantly lower than amounts delivered to adults (i.e., up to 25% of the nominal dose), but similar to amounts delivered to children and infants, the latter having a predominantly nasal breathing. However, significant clinical effects have been shown in both populations when delivering bronchodilators through NHF. This interface is particularly well tolerated and may be useful to improve aerosol therapy tolerance in the pediatric setting. Thus, among patients undergoing NHF therapy, bronchodilators may be delivered through this route. Whereas other drugs may be delivered this way or if there is a patient-centered benefit to specifically use NHF for aerosol therapy among patients without ongoing ventilatory support, requires further evaluation and technological development

Aerosolized Antibiotics

Aerosolized antibiotics potentially enable delivery of drugs directly at the site of lung infection with limited systemic side effects. Progress in understanding determinants of pharmacokinetics and drug deposition in the lung enable delivery of high antibiotic concentrations in the lung. The present review summarizes experimental and clinical pharmacokinetic and scintigraphic deposition studies evaluating aerosolized antibiotics. Practical implementation of different aerosolization devices is reviewed for delivery to patients breathing spontaneously or undergoing mechanical ventilation. Current clinical indications among patients suffering from cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, and ventilator-associated pneumonia are presented as well as further perspectives for development for this appealing modality of antibiotic therapy

Influence of inspiratory flow pattern and nebulizer position on aerosol delivery with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation: An in vitro analysis

Background: Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) depends on nebulizer type, placement of the nebulizer and ventilator settings. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of two inspiratory flow patterns on amikacin delivery with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer placed at different positions on an adult lung model of IMV equipped with a proximal flow sensor (PFS). Methods: IMV was simulated using a ventilator connected to a lung model through an 8-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tube. The impact of a decelerating and a constant flow pattern on aerosol delivery was evaluated in volume-controlled mode (tidal volume 500 mL, 20 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1 sec, bias flow of 10 L/min). An amikacin solution (250 mg/3 mL) was nebulized with Aeroneb Solo® placed at five positions on the ventilator circuit equipped with a PFS: connected to the endotracheal tube (A), to the Y-piece (B), placed at 15 cm (C) and 45 cm upstream of the Y-piece (D), and placed at 15 cm of the inspiratory outlet of the ventilator (E). The four last positions were also tested without PFS. Deposited doses of amikacin were measured using the gravimetric residual method. Results: Amikacin delivery was significantly reduced with a decelerating inspiratory flow pattern compared to a constant flow (p<0.05). With a constant inspiratory flow pattern, connecting the nebulizer to the endotracheal tube enabled similar deposited doses than these obtained when connecting the nebulizer close to the ventilator. The PFS reduced deposited doses only when the nebulizer was connected to the Y-piece with both flow patterns or placed at 15 cm of the Y-piece with a constant inspiratory flow (p<0.01). Conclusions: Using similar tidal volume and inspiratory time, a constant flow pattern (30 L/min) delivers a higher amount of amikacin through an endotracheal tube compared to a decelerating inspiratory flow pattern (peak inspiratory flow around 60 L/min). The optimal nebulizer position depends on the inspiratory flow pattern and the presence of a PFS