Estructura familiar no informativa y fenotipo tumoral triple-negativo como variables predictivas de mutaciones germinales en "BRCA1/2" en mujeres jóvenes con cáncer de mama esporádico

Un porcentaje no desdeñable de mujeres jóvenes con cáncer de mama esporádico son portadoras de mutaciones germinales en BRCA1/2. Esta prevalencia está estrechamente condicionada por otras variables como el tipo de población, fenotipo tumoral y edad de diagnóstico de cáncer de mama. La presencia de una estructura familiar no informativa es una variable predictiva de la presencia de mutaciones en BRCA1/2 en estas pacientes, pero este hallazgo no ha sido debidamente validado en cohortes independientes. Existe una fuerte asociación entre las mutaciones en BRCA1 y los tumores mamarios de tipo triple negativo (TN). En el presente trabajo analizamos la utilidad de las variables estructura familiar no informativa y fenotipo TN como variables predictivas de mutaciones germinales en BRCA1/2 en una cohorte de mujeres jóvenes ( 35 años) con cáncer de mama esporádico previamente remitidas (1998-2012) a unidades de asesoramiento genético españolas (n = 341). Retrospectivamente, la estructura familiar fue clasificada en informativa, no informativa o no clasificable mediante la revisión centralizada de los pedigrees disponibles en el momento de realizarse los respectivos estudios genéticos. Asimismo, los tumores de mama fueron clasificados en TN, no-TN y no clasificables mediante la revisión de las historias clínicas. Veinticuatro pacientes (7.12 %) fueron portadoras de mutaciones patogénicas, 14 en BRCA1 y 10 en BRCA2. Tanto la estructura familiar no informativa (OR = 3.61, p = 0.027) como el subtipo TN (OR = 3.14, p = 0.013) fueron variables independientes de la presencia de mutaciones germinales en BRCA1/2. La prevalencia de mutaciones en el subgrupo de mujeres con al menos un factor predictivo (estructura familiar no informativa, subtipo TN o ambos) fue del 13.5 %, frente al 2.8 % en aquellas mujeres con estrucutra familiar informativa y tumores no-TN (OR = 5.31, p = 0.006). Demostramos, con la información disponible en un contexto de práctica clínica rutinaria, la utilidad de la estructura familiar y el fenotipo TN como modelo predictivo de mutaciones germinales en BRCA1/2 en mujeres jóvenes con cáncer de mama esporádico. Nuestro estudio sugiere que restringir el análisis tan solo a aquellas mujeres con al menos un factor predicitivo podría ser una estrategia válida para optimizar la realización de estudios genéticos en este subgrupo de mujeres

Estudio de CD44 como un posible nuevo biomarcador indicativo de sensibilidad al bloqueo del eje PD-1 en cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas (CPCNP) avanzado

CD44 es una glicoproteína de superficie expresada en diversos tipos de tumores, incluido el CPCNP. Esta proteína aporta ventajas en la progresión tumoral, participando en procesos como la transición epiteliomesénquima (EMT) y, como biomarcador, su expresión ha sido relacionada en la mayoría de casos con un peor pronóstico. Sin embargo, tras los resultados obtenidos en las investigaciones realizadas por Moutafi, Molero et al, en este estudio se han iniciado los experimentos pertinentes para vislumbrar los mecanismos moleculares que causan sensibilidad a la inhibición del eje PD-1 en CPCNP. A través de RTPCR se ha identificado la isoforma CD44s en cinco líneas celulares de cáncer de pulmón murino (UNCSCC679, UNCSCC680, KLN205, Lacun2 y Lacun3). Además, con el diseño de cuatro sgRNA y mediante la técnica de CRISPR/Cas9 se han conseguido crear tres líneas celulares knock-out para CD44 (UNCSCC679, KLN205 y Lacun3) con el fin de inducir tumores en ratones inmunocompetentes para evaluar los efectos de la inmunoterapia anti-PD1. Los hallazgos de este trabajo son imprescindibles para el desarrollo de modelos murinos que ayuden a conocer el comportamiento de tumores de CPCNP y el descubrimiento de una terapia eficaz contra ellos

Nivolumab Monotherapy and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CheckMate 032 Randomized Cohort

Abstract Introduction Nivolumab monotherapy is approved in the United States for third-line or later metastatic small cell lung cancer based on pooled data from nonrandomized and randomized cohorts of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of nivolumab ± ipilimumab (CheckMate 032; NCT01928394). We report updated results, including long-term overall survival (OS), from the randomized cohort. Methods Patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression after one to two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 3:2 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by number of prior chemotherapy regimens and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Results Overall, 147 patients received nivolumab and 96 nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Minimum follow-up for ORR/progression-free survival/safety was 11.9 months (nivolumab) and 11.2 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). ORR increased with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (21.9% versus 11.6% with nivolumab; odds ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.06–4.26; p = 0.03). For long-term OS, minimum follow-up was 29.0 months (nivolumab) versus 28.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab); median (95% confidence interval) OS was 5.7 (3.8–7.6) versus 4.7 months (3.1–8.3). Twenty-four–month OS rates were 17.9% (nivolumab) and 16.9% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 12.9% (nivolumab) versus 37.5% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and treatment-related deaths were n =1 versus n = 3, respectively. Conclusions Whereas ORR (primary endpoint) was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, OS was similar between groups. In each group, OS remained encouraging with long-term follow-up. Toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy

Spatially resolved proteomic profiling identifies tumor cell CD44 as a biomarker associated with sensitivity to PD-1 axis blockade in advanced non-small- cell lung cancer

Most patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) fail to derive significant benefit from programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) axis blockade, and new biomarkers of response are needed. In this study, we aimed to discover and validate spatially resolved protein markers associated with sensitivity to PD-1 axis inhibition in NSCLC

Severe perirenal hematoma in a patient with a single kidney treated with sunitinib for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

A better understanding of the angiogenic process has markedly expanded the use of antiangiogenic therapy in many solid tumors. It is known that there is a close relationship between cancer disease, vascular homeostasis, angiogenesis and coagulation cascade. In this setting, antiangiogenic therapy could interfere and potentially increase the risk of bleeding or thromboembolic events. Sunitinib is an orally available smallmolecule multikinase inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic, well-differenciated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with disease progression in adults. Here we present the first case of a severe perirenal hematoma in a patient treated with sunitinib for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Limited family structure and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype as predictors of BRCA mutations in a genetic counseling cohort of early-onset sporadic breast cancers

Early-onset diagnosis is an eligibility criterion for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) testing in sporadic breast cancer patients. Limited family structure has been proposed as a predictor of BRCA mutation status in this group of patients. An overwhelming amount of data supports a strong association between BRCA1 mutations and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we analyze the feasibility of using limited family structure and TNBC as predictors of BRCA mutation status in early-onset breast cancer patients attending genetic counseling units. We have conducted the study in a cohort of sporadic early-onset (≤35 years) breast cancer patients (N = 341) previously selected for BRCA genetic testing in Academic Hereditary Cancer Clinics from Spain. A retrospective review of medical records available at the time of risk assessment allowed us classifying patients according to family structure and TNBC. In addition, BRCAPRO score was calculated for all patients. Association between categorical variables was investigated using the Fisher’s exact test. Binary Logistic Regression Analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Limited family structure (OR 3.61, p = 0.013) and TNBC (OR 3.14, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of BRCA mutation status. Mutation prevalence in the subgroup of patients with at least one positive predictor was 14 %, whereas it dropped to 3 % in non-TNBCs with adequate family history (OR 5.31, 95 % CI 1.38–23.89, p = 0.006). BRCAPRO correctly discerned between limited and adequate family structures. Limited family structure and TNBC are feasible predictors of BRCA mutation status in sporadic early-onset (≤35 years) breast cancer patients attending genetic counseling units. The low prevalence of mutations observed in non-TNBCs with adequate family structure suggests that this subgroup of patients might be excluded from genetic testing.This work was supported by research Grants (PI12/00539) to M. de la Hoya, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation & Eurpean Regional Development Fund (ERDF) ‘‘A way to make Europe’’, research grants (RD06/0020/1051 and RD12/0036/008) from Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer (RTICC) to E. Diaz-Rubio, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation & Eurpean Regional Development Fund (ERDF) ‘‘A way to make Europe’’, research Grant (10PXIB 9101297PR), Xunta de Galicia, and research grant FMM Foundation to A. Vega.Peer Reviewe

Future Perspectives in the Second Line Therapeutic Setting for Non-Oncogene Addicted Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Blocking the anti-PD-1 axis represents the current standard of care in the first-line setting, with drugs administered either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Despite notable successes achieved with ICIs, most of their long-term benefits are restricted to approximately 20% of patients. Consequently, the post-failure treatment landscape after failure to first-line treatment remains a complex challenge. Currently, docetaxel remains the preferred option, although its benefits remain modest as most patients do not respond or progress promptly. In recent times, novel agents and treatment combinations have emerged, offering fresh opportunities to improve patient outcomes. ICIs combined either with antiangiogenic or other novel immunotherapeutic compounds have shown promising preliminary activity. However, more mature data concerning specific combinations do not support their benefit over standard of care. In addition, antibody–drug conjugates seem to be the most promising alternative among all available compounds according to already-published phase I/II data that will be confirmed in soon-to-be-published phase III trial data. In this report, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current second-line treatment options and discuss future therapeutic perspectives

Future Perspectives in the Second Line Therapeutic Setting for Non-Oncogene Addicted Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Despite the use of novel agents in the first-line therapeutic setting, such as PD- 1/PDL1 axis blockers for non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer, most patients with advanced disease experience progression will succumb to the illness within a short period of time. Currently, the standard second-line treatment consists primarily of systemic cytotoxic therapies, which typically yield poor outcomes. Recently, several novel therapeutic strategies have emerged that may improve patient outcomes. This article reviews current state-of-the-art treatments in this scenario and highlights potential future options.Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Blocking the anti-PD-1 axis represents the current standard of care in the first-line setting, with drugs administered either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Despite notable successes achieved with ICIs, most of their longterm benefits are restricted to approximately 20% of patients. Consequently, the post-failure treatment landscape after failure to first-line treatment remains a complex challenge. Currently, docetaxel remains the preferred option, although its benefits remain modest as most patients do not respond or progress promptly. In recent times, novel agents and treatment combinations have emerged, offering fresh opportunities to improve patient outcomes. ICIs combined either with antiangiogenic or other novel immunotherapeutic compounds have shown promising preliminary activity. However, more mature data concerning specific combinations do not support their benefit over standard of care. In addition, antibody–drug conjugates seem to be the most promising alternative among all available compounds according to already-published phase I/II data that will be confirmed in soon-to-bepublished phase III trial data. In this report, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current second-line treatment options and discuss future therapeutic perspectives.Depto. de MedicinaFac. de MedicinaTRUEpubDescuento UC

Multiplex Quantitative Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts, and CD200 in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is marked by a desmoplastic tumor microenvironment and low tumor immunogenicity, making it difficult for immunotherapy drugs to improve outcomes for patients. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are seen in the tumor microenvironment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this work, we sought to characterize the expression levels and potential prognostic value of TILs (CD4, CD8, and CD20) and CAFs (Thy-1, FAP, and SMA) in a large retrospective cohort of PDAC patients. Additionally, we investigated the expression levels and prognostic significance of CD200, an immunoinhibitory protein that has shown interest as a potential target for immune checkpoint blockade. We measured the expression levels of these seven proteins with multiplexed immunofluorescence staining and quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF). We found CD8 and FAP to be independent predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. CD200 was found to be heterogeneously expressed in both the tumor and stromal compartments of PDAC, with the majority of patients having positive stromal expression and negative tumor expression. This work demonstrates the potential clinical utility of CD8 and FAP in PDAC patients, and it sheds light on the expression patterns of CD200 in pancreatic cancer as the protein is being tested as a target for immune checkpoint blockade

Association of PD-1/PD-L1 Co-location with Immunotherapy Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) interaction suppresses local T-cell responses and promotes peripheral tolerance. In the current study, we focus on PD-1/PD-L1 co-location as a surrogate for this interaction and assess its association with immunotherapy outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Experimental Design: Pretreatment biopsies from a retrospective cohort of 154 immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced NSCLC were analyzed. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was assessed by multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and PD-1 expression in the same pixels as PD-L1 (called a co-location score) was measured using an algorithm to define overlapping expression areas. Co-location scores were correlated with immunotherapy outcomes and PD-L1 tumor proportion score. Results: PD-1/PD-L1 co-location score was associated with best overall response (P= 0.0012), progression-free survival (P = 0.0341), and overall survival after immunotherapy (P = 0.0249). The association was driven by patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors in the second or subsequent line of treatment. PD-L1 tumor proportion score by IHC was also correlated with best overall response and progression-free survival. PD-L1 measured within the tumor compartment by QIF did not show any significant association with either best overall response or overall survival. Finally, co-location score was not associated with PD-L1 expression by either method. Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, co-location score shows promise as a biomarker associated with outcome after immunotherapy. With further validation, it could have value as a predictive biomarker for the selection of patients with NSCLC receiving treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors