34 research outputs found

    Induction of epigenetic variation in Arabidopsis by over-expression of DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1 (MET1)

    Get PDF
    Epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and histone modification can vary among plant accessions creating epi-alleles with different levels of expression competence. Mutations in epigenetic pathway functions are powerful tools to induce epigenetic variation. As an alternative approach, we investigated the potential of over-expressing an epigenetic function, using DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1 (MET1) for proof-of-concept. In Arabidopsis thaliana, MET1 controls maintenance of cytosine methylation at symmetrical CG positions. At some loci, which contain dense DNA methylation in CG- and non-CG context, loss of MET1 causes joint loss of all cytosines methylation marks. We find that over-expression of both catalytically active and inactive versions of MET1 stochastically generates new epi-alleles at loci encoding transposable elements, non-coding RNAs and proteins, which results for most loci in an increase in expression. Individual transformants share some common phenotypes and genes with altered gene expression. Altered expression states can be transmitted to the next generation, which does not require the continuous presence of the MET1 transgene. Long-term stability and epigenetic features differ for individual loci. Our data show that over-expression of MET1, and potentially of other genes encoding epigenetic factors, offers an alternative strategy to identify epigenetic target genes and to create novel epi-alleles

    Influenza A Virus Inhibits Type I IFN Signaling via NF-κB-Dependent Induction of SOCS-3 Expression

    Get PDF
    The type I interferon (IFN) system is a first line of defense against viral infections. Viruses have developed various mechanisms to counteract this response. So far, the interferon antagonistic activity of influenza A viruses was mainly observed on the level of IFNβ gene induction via action of the viral non-structural protein 1 (NS1). Here we present data indicating that influenza A viruses not only suppress IFNβ gene induction but also inhibit type I IFN signaling through a mechanism involving induction of the suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) protein. Our study was based on the observation that in cells that were infected with influenza A virus and subsequently stimulated with IFNα/β, phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription protein 1 (STAT1) was strongly reduced. This impaired STAT1 activation was not due to the action of viral proteins but rather appeared to be induced by accumulation of viral 5′ triphosphate RNA in the cell. SOCS proteins are potent endogenous inhibitors of Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT signaling. Closer examination revealed that SOCS-3 but not SOCS-1 mRNA levels increase in an RNA- and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-dependent but type I IFN-independent manner early in the viral replication cycle. This direct viral induction of SOCS-3 mRNA and protein expression appears to be relevant for suppression of the antiviral response since in SOCS-3 deficient cells a sustained phosphorylation of STAT1 correlated with elevated expression of type I IFN-dependent genes. As a consequence, progeny virus titers were reduced in SOCS-3 deficient cells or in cells were SOCS-3 expression was knocked-down by siRNA. These data provide the first evidence that influenza A viruses suppress type I IFN signaling on the level of JAK/STAT activation. The inhibitory effect is at least in part due to the induction of SOCS-3 gene expression, which results in an impaired antiviral response

    The zymogen granule protein 2 (GP2) binds to scavenger receptor expressed on endothelial cells I (SREC-I)

    Get PDF
    The pancreatic zymogen granule membrane protein (GP2) is expressed by pancreatic acinar cells and M cells of the ileum. GP2 is the closest related homologue of the urine resident Tamm–Horsfall protein (THP). Recently, it was shown that THP is a ligand of various scavenger receptors (SRs). Therefore, we were interested, if GP2 has similar properties

    Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction in Hemodialysis Patients: Prevalence, Disease Prediction and Prognosis

    No full text
    Background/Aims: Heart failure (HF) is a main cause of mortality of hemodialysis (HD) patients. While HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is known to only affect a minority of patients, little is known about the prevalence, associations with clinical characteristics and prognosis of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We included 105 maintenance HD patients from the Medical University of Vienna into this prospective single-center cohort study and determined the prevalence of HFpEF (per the 2013 criteria of the European Society of Cardiology) and HFrEF (EF <45%), using standardized post-HD transthoracic echocardiography. We also assessed clinical, laboratory and volume status parameters (by bioimpedance spectroscopy). These parameters served to calculate prediction models for both disease entities, while clinical outcomes (frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations and/or cardiac death) were assessed prospectively over 274 months of follow-up. Results: All but 4 patients (96%) had evidence of diastolic dysfunction. 70% of the entire cohort fulfilled HF criteria (81% HFpEF, 19% HFrEF). Age, female sex, body mass index, blood pressure and dialysis vintage were predictive of HFpEF (sensitivity 86%, specificity 63%; AUC 0.87), while age, female sex, NT pro-BNP, history of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were predictive of HFrEF (sensitivity 85%, specificity 90%; AUC 0.95). Compared to patients without HF, those with HFpEF and HFrEF had a higher risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular reason and/or cardiac death (adjusted HR 4.31, 95% CI 0.46-40.03; adjusted HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.08-9.75, respectively). Conclusion: Diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF are highly prevalent in HD patients while HFrEF only affects a minority. Distinct patient-specific characteristics predict diagnosis of either entity with good accuracy.(VLID)486423

    Molecular remodeling of the renin-angiotensin system after kidney transplantation

    No full text
    Objective: We aimed at assessing the molecular adaptation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) after successful kidney transplantation (KTX). Materials and methods: In this prospective, exploratory study we analyzed 12 hemodialysis (HD) patients, who received a KTX and had excellent graft function six to 12 months thereafter. The concentrations of plasma Angiotensin (Ang) peptides (Ang I, Ang II, Ang-(17), Ang-(15), Ang-(28), Ang-(38)) were simultaneously quantified with a novel mass spectrometry-based method. Further, renin and aldosterone concentrations were determined by standard immunoassays. Results: Ang values showed a strong inter-individual variability among HD patients. Yet, despite a continued broad dispersion of Ang values after KTX, a substantial improvement of the renin/Ang II correlation was observed in patients without RAS blockade or on angiotensin receptor blocker (HD: renin/Ang II R2 = 0.660, KTX: renin/Ang II R2 = 0.918). Ang-(17) representing the alternative RAS axis was only marginally detectable both on HD and after KTX. Conclusions: Following KTX, renin-dependent Ang II formation adapts in non-ACE inhibitor-treated patients. Thus, a largely normal RAS regulation is reconstituted after successful KTX. However, individual Ang concentration variations and a lack of potentially beneficial alternative peptides after KTX call for individualized treatment. The long-term post-transplant RAS regulation remains to be determined.(VLID)456375

    Bemerkungen zu Papyri XXXI: 855–885

    No full text
    &lt;Korr. Tyche&gt; 855–885&lt;Korr. Tyche&gt; 855–88

    Effects of direct renin inhibition versus angiotensin II receptor blockade on angiotensin profiles in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease

    No full text
    <p><b>Background:</b> Direct renin inhibition (DRI) is clinically inferior to other blockers of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS). Thus far, the underlying molecular causes of this finding remain unknown.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> Twenty four patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages III–IV and albuminuria were randomized to DRI or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Employing a novel mass-spectrometry method, the concentrations of renin, aldosterone and plasma angiotensin peptides [Ang I, Ang II, Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-5), Ang-(2-8), Ang-(3-8)] were quantified before and after an 8-week treatment.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> While blood pressure, renal function and albuminuria decreased comparably in both groups, profound RAS component differences were observed: DRI led to a massive renin increase, while suppressing both vasoconstrictive (Ang I and Ang II) and vasodilatory RAS metabolites (Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-5)). In contrast, ARB led to a four-fold increase of Ang I and Ang II, while Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-5) increased moderately but significantly. With ARB treatment, a decreased aldosterone-to-Ang II ratio suggested efficacy in blocking AT1 receptor.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> DRI therapy abolishes all RAS effector peptides. ARB increases both vasoconstrictive and vasodilative angiotensins, while this is accompanied by efficient blockade of vasoconstrictive effects. These differential molecular regulations should be considered when selecting optimal antihypertensive and disease-modifying therapy in CKD patients.Key messages</p><p>Direct renin inhibition leads to a complete and lasting abolition of both classical and alternative RAS components.</p><p>Angiotensin receptor blockade leads to effective receptor blockade and up-regulation of alternative RAS components.</p><p>Differential molecular regulations of the RAS should be considered when selecting optimal antihypertensive and disease-modifying therapy in CKD patients.</p><p></p> <p>Direct renin inhibition leads to a complete and lasting abolition of both classical and alternative RAS components.</p> <p>Angiotensin receptor blockade leads to effective receptor blockade and up-regulation of alternative RAS components.</p> <p>Differential molecular regulations of the RAS should be considered when selecting optimal antihypertensive and disease-modifying therapy in CKD patients.</p
    corecore