9 research outputs found
Isaac Newton learns Hebrew: Samuel Johnson's Nova cubi HebrĂŠi tabella
This article concerns the earliest evidence for Isaac Newtonâs use of Hebrew: a manuscript copy by Newton of part of a work intended to provide a reader of the Hebrew alphabet with the ability to identify or memorize more than 1000 words and to begin to master the conjugations of the Hebrew verb. In describing the content of this unpublished manuscript and establishing its source and original author for the first time, we suggest how and when Newton may have initially become acquainted with the language. Finally, basing our discussion in part on an examination of the reading marks that Newton left in the surviving copies of Hebrew grammars and lexicons that he owned, we will argue that his interest in Hebrew was not intended to achieve linguistic proficiency but remained limited to particular theological queries of singular concern.Michael Joallandâs work was supported by the University of Suwon, 2013. The images are reproduced courtesy of the Syndics of The Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, and of the Syndics of the Cambridge University Library
Isaac Newton and the Disenchantment of the Cosmos : iconoclasm and Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century
Isaac Newton remarqua dans la conclusion de ses fameux Principes mathĂ©matiques de la philosophie naturelle (1687) : « Les idolĂątres sâimaginaient que le soleil, la lune, les astres, les Ăąmes des hommes et toutes les autres parties du monde Ă©taient des parties du Dieu suprĂȘme et que, par consĂ©quent, on devait leur rendre un culte, mais câĂ©tait une erreur. » Le mathĂ©maticien observait de façon similaire en concluant son TraitĂ© dâoptique : « A la vĂ©ritĂ©, si les paĂŻens nâeussent pas Ă©tĂ© aveuglĂ©s par le culte des faux dieux, ils auraient poussĂ© leur philosophie morale bien au-delĂ de ce quâils nommaient les quatre vertus cardinales ; et au lieu dâenseigner la transmigration des Ăąmes, le culte du soleil et de la lune, et des hĂ©ros dĂ©cĂ©dĂ©s, ils auraient enseignĂ© la raison suprĂȘme pour laquelle notre souverain Bienfaiteur et vĂ©ritable Auteur doit ĂȘtre adorĂ©. » Une question se pose au lecteur contemporain : comment rendre compte de lâinsertion de ces considĂ©rations thĂ©ologiques en conclusion de deux traitĂ©s de nature essentiellement mathĂ©matique ?Des Ă©lĂ©ments de rĂ©ponse se trouvent dans un manuscrit inachevĂ© de Newton intitulĂ© « Les origines philosophiques de la thĂ©ologie paĂŻenne » (TheologiĂŠ gentilis origines philosophicĂŠ), un traitĂ© dâhistoire des religions comportant plus de 130.000 mots rĂ©partis sur quelque 200 folios. Newton y soutient notamment que la cosmologie des Anciens Ă©tait de nature thĂ©ologique du fait quâelle procĂ©dait en partie de la projection sur les Ă©lĂ©ments du cosmos des Ăąmes des ancĂȘtres de lâhumanitĂ© dĂ©ifiĂ©s. Câest ainsi que Newton voit dans la catastĂ©risation des premiers hommes lâorigine de lâanimisme astral, de lâastrolĂątrie et de lâastrologie. A ses yeux, la chute originelle de lâhomme dans lâidolĂątrie aurait corrompu aussi bien la vraie religion que la connaissance de la philosophie naturelle, lâanimisme propre aux cosmologies des anciens peuples orientaux formant le pendant philosophique de lâastrolĂątrie paĂŻenne. Il importait dĂšs lors de dĂ©sacraliser les Ă©lĂ©ments du cosmos afin de rĂ©tablir aussi bien le culte pur que la science vĂ©ritable.AprĂšs avoir identifiĂ© les sources et dĂ©crit les principes exĂ©gĂ©tiques qui sous-tendent le traitĂ© des Origines, nous examinerons lâhistoriographie newtonienne des origines et de la diffusion de la physico-thĂ©ologie paĂŻenne, depuis la naissance du culte des astres en Egypte ancienne jusquâaux doctrines Ă©manationnistes enseignĂ©es par les scolastiques. Nous montrerons ensuite en quoi le systĂšme du monde proposĂ© par Newton se prĂ©sentait comme une alternative dĂ©sacralisĂ©e aux conceptions cosmologiques animistes des Anciens. Nous nous interrogerons finalement sur la provenance de lâanimus iconoclaste qui caractĂ©rise les Ă©crits thĂ©ologiques et philosophiques de Newton. Il sâagira de discerner les sources dâinfluence qui marquĂšrent sa formation intellectuelle et religieuse au travers de lâexamen des polĂ©miques qui divisĂšrent le milieu rĂ©formĂ© au sein duquel il grandit. Il en ressortira que lâauteur des Principes entendait bien dĂ©senchanter le cosmos afin de satisfaire les exigences dâun monothĂ©isme austĂšre et intransigeant.Isaac Newton stated in his conclusion to the Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1687) : âIdolaters imagined that the sun, moon, and stars, the souls of men, and other parts of the world were parts of the supreme God, and so were to be worshipped, but they were mistaken.â The famed mathematician correspondingly observed in the conclusion of his treatise on Opticks : âAnd no doubt, if the worship of false gods had not blinded the heathen, their moral philosophy would have gone farther than to the four cardinal virtues; and instead of teaching the transmigration of souls, and to worship the sun, and moon, and dead heroes, they would have taught us to worship our true Author and Benefactor.â The modern reader may ask : Why conclude two treatises that are fundamentally mathematical in nature with these theological considerations?Part of the answer lays in an uncompleted manuscript by Newton titled âThe Philosophical Origins of Pagan Theologyâ (TheologiĂŠ gentilis origines philosophicĂŠ), a treatise on the history of religions comprising more than 130.000 words on about 200 folios. Newtonâs claim therein is that the cosmology of the Ancients was in essence theological since it partly proceeded from the belief that the souls of the deified ancestors of mankind had been projected into elements of the cosmos. This catasterisation of early men was, in Newtonâs eyes, the actual origin of stellar animism, star worship, and astrology. Thus, the original fall of man into idolatry corrupted both true religion and the right understanding of natural philosophy, as the intrinsic animism of oriental cosmologies was the philosophical counterpart of pagan astrolatry. Restoring pure worship and true science required, therefore, that elements of the cosmos be first desacralized.In this work, I will first identify the sources and characterize the exegetical principles behind the treatise on Origins. I will then examine the Newtonian historiography of the origins and dissemination of pagan physicotheology, from the beginning of star worship in ancient Egypt to the emanationist doctrines taught by Medieval schoolmen. I will then show how Newtonâs own system of the world presented itself as a disenchanted alternative to the animistic cosmological beliefs of the Ancients. I will eventually trace the roots of Newtonsâs iconoclastic ethos which characterizes much of his theological and philosophical writings. To this end, I will consider the sources of influence that bore upon Newtonâs upbringing in relation to the religious contentions which divided the Reformed milieu he grew up in. I will eventually argue that the author of the Principia meant indeed to desacralize the cosmos to meet the demands of an austere and uncompromising monotheism
Isaac Newton learns Hebrew: Samuel Johnson's Nova cubi HebrĂŠi tabella
This article concerns the earliest evidence for Isaac Newtonâs use of Hebrew: a manuscript copy by Newton of part of a work intended to provide a reader of the Hebrew alphabet with the ability to identify or memorize more than 1000 words and to begin to master the conjugations of the Hebrew verb. In describing the content of this unpublished manuscript and establishing its source and original author for the first time, we suggest how and when Newton may have initially become acquainted with the language. Finally, basing our discussion in part on an examination of the reading marks that Newton left in the surviving copies of Hebrew grammars and lexicons that he owned, we will argue that his interest in Hebrew was not intended to achieve linguistic proficiency but remained limited to particular theological queries of singular concern.Michael Joallandâs work was supported by the University of Suwon, 2013. The images are reproduced courtesy of the Syndics of The Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, and of the Syndics of the Cambridge University Library
Cosmic anions in the laboratory
International audienc
Elusive anion growth in Titanâs atmosphere: low temperature kinetics of the C3Nââ + HC3N reaction
International audienceIon chemistry appears to be deeply involved in the formation of heavy molecules in the upper atmosphere of Titan. These large species form the seeds of the organic aerosols responsible for the opaque haze surrounding the biggest satellite of Saturn. The chemical pathways involving individual anions remain however mostly unknown. The determination of the rates of the elementary reactions with ions and the identification of the products are essential to the progress in our understanding of Titanâs upper atmosphere. We have taken steps in that direction through the investigation of the low temperature reactivity of C3Nâ,â, which was tentatively identified in the spectra measured by the CAPS-ELS instrument of the Cassini spacecraft during its high altitude flybys. The reaction of this anion with HC3N, one of the most abundant trace organics in the atmosphere, has been studied over the 49â294 K temperature range in uniform supersonic flows using the CRESU technique. The proton transfer is found to be the main exit channel ( > 91%) of the CView the MathML source315Nââ + HC3N reaction. It remains however indistinguishable with the non-isotopically labeled CView the MathML source314Nââ reactant. The Tâ1/2Tâ1/2 temperature dependence of this proton transfer reaction and its global rate are reasonably well reproduced theoretically using an average dipole orientation model. A minor exit channel, reactive detachment ( < 9%), has also been uncovered, although the nature of the neutral products has not been determined. It is concluded that the CView the MathML source314Nââ + HC3N reaction cannot contribute to the growth of molecular anions in the upper atmosphere of Titan. Due to the low branching into the neutral exit channel, it cannot contribute either to the growth of neutrals even assuming a complete mass transfer