Stimulus-Dependent Adjustment of Reward Prediction Error in the Midbrain

Previous reports have described that neural activities in midbrain dopamine areas are sensitive to unexpected reward delivery and omission. These activities are correlated with reward prediction error in reinforcement learning models, the difference between predicted reward values and the obtained reward outcome. These findings suggest that the reward prediction error signal in the brain updates reward prediction through stimulus–reward experiences. It remains unknown, however, how sensory processing of reward-predicting stimuli contributes to the computation of reward prediction error. To elucidate this issue, we examined the relation between stimulus discriminability of the reward-predicting stimuli and the reward prediction error signal in the brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Before main experiments, subjects learned an association between the orientation of a perceptually salient (high-contrast) Gabor patch and a juice reward. The subjects were then presented with lower-contrast Gabor patch stimuli to predict a reward. We calculated the correlation between fMRI signals and reward prediction error in two reinforcement learning models: a model including the modulation of reward prediction by stimulus discriminability and a model excluding this modulation. Results showed that fMRI signals in the midbrain are more highly correlated with reward prediction error in the model that includes stimulus discriminability than in the model that excludes stimulus discriminability. No regions showed higher correlation with the model that excludes stimulus discriminability. Moreover, results show that the difference in correlation between the two models was significant from the first session of the experiment, suggesting that the reward computation in the midbrain was modulated based on stimulus discriminability before learning a new contingency between perceptually ambiguous stimuli and a reward. These results suggest that the human reward system can incorporate the level of the stimulus discriminability flexibly into reward computations by modulating previously acquired reward values for a typical stimulus

Cooperative Transport between NukFEG and NukH in Immunity against the Lantibiotic Nukacin ISK-1 Produced by Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1▿

Nukacin ISK-1 is a lantibiotic produced by Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1. Previous studies have reported that the self-protection system of the nukacin ISK-1 producer involves the cooperative function of the ABC transporter NukFEG and the lantibiotic-binding immunity protein NukH. In this study, the cooperative mechanism between NukFEG and NukH was characterized by using fluorescein-4-isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled nukacin ISK-1 (FITC-nuk) to clarify the localization of nukacin ISK-1 in the immunity process. Lactococcus lactis recombinants expressing nukFEGH, nukFEG, or nukH showed immunity against FITC-nuk, suggesting that FITC-nuk was recognized by the self-protection system against nukacin ISK-1. Analysis of the interaction between FITC-nuk and energy-deprived cells of the L. lactis recombinants showed that FITC-nuk specifically bound to cells expressing nukH. The interaction between FITC-nuk and nukH-expressing cells was inhibited by the addition of unlabeled nukacin ISK-1 and its derivatives with deletions of the N-terminal tail region, but not by the addition of a synthesized N-terminal tail region. This suggests that the NukH protein recognizes the C-terminal ring region of nukacin ISK-1. The addition of glucose to nukFEGH-expressing cells treated with FITC-nuk resulted in a time-dependent decrease in fluorescence intensity, indicating that FITC-nuk was transported from the cell membrane by the NukFEG protein. These results revealed that after being captured by NukH in an energy-independent manner, nukacin ISK-1 was transported to the extracellular space by NukFEG in an energy-dependent manner

Determination of the InvE Binding Site Required for Expression of IpaB of the Shigella sonnei Virulence Plasmid: Involvement of a ParB BoxA-Like Sequence

The InvE protein positively regulates the expression of virulence genes ipaBCD in Shigella sonnei. The InvE has significant homology with ParB of plasmid P1, which is known as a plasmid partitioning factor with DNA binding ability. Although the DNA binding activity of InvE has been predicted, it is not known whether the DNA binding activity is necessary for type III secretion system-associated gene expression. In this study, we determined the transcription start site of the icsB-ipaBCD operon (ipa operon) and constructed a series of deletions of the icsB promoter region in the Escherichia coli K-12 background. The deletion study revealed that an 86-bp region upstream of the icsB transcription start site was essential for expression of the ipa operon, where the ParB binding motif (ParB BoxA-like sequence) was observed. Purified glutathione S-transferase-InvE fusion protein bound directly to the −93 to −54 region (designating the icsB transcription start site as nucleotide +1) containing the ParB BoxA-like sequence. These results indicated that InvE bound directly to the promoter region

How Sound Symbolism Is Processed in the Brain: A Study on Japanese Mimetic Words

<div><p>Sound symbolism is the systematic and non-arbitrary link between word and meaning. Although a number of behavioral studies demonstrate that both children and adults are universally sensitive to sound symbolism in mimetic words, the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have not yet been extensively investigated. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how Japanese mimetic words are processed in the brain. In Experiment 1, we compared processing for motion mimetic words with that for non-sound symbolic motion verbs and adverbs. Mimetic words uniquely activated the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS). In Experiment 2, we further examined the generalizability of the findings from Experiment 1 by testing another domain: shape mimetics. Our results show that the right posterior STS was active when subjects processed both motion and shape mimetic words, thus suggesting that this area may be the primary structure for processing sound symbolism. Increased activity in the right posterior STS may also reflect how sound symbolic words function as both linguistic and non-linguistic iconic symbols.</p></div

Model simulation of predicted reward values for Gabor patch stimuli.

<p>(a) Changes of <i>Vr</i>(<i>t</i>) and (b) changes in percentage of trials in which <i>Vr</i>(<i>t</i>) was higher than <i>Vn</i>(<i>t</i>). Results obtained using three representative values of <i>α</i> (0.01, 0.05, and 0.1) are depicted. <i>Vr</i>(<i>t</i>) decreased faster in the WITHOUT model than WITH model. Error bars represent ±1 s.e.m.</p