39 research outputs found

    Can environmental or occupational hazards alter the sex ratio at birth? A systematic review

    Get PDF
    More than 100 studies have examined whether environmental or occupational exposures of parents affect the sex ratio of their offspring at birth. For this review, we searched Medline and Web of Science using the terms ‘sex ratio at birth’ and ‘sex ratio and exposure’ for all dates, and reviewed bibliographies of relevant studies to find additional articles. This review focuses on exposures that have been the subject of at least four studies including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, pesticides, lead and other metals, radiation, boron, and g-forces. For paternal exposures, only dioxins and PCBs were consistently associated with sex ratios higher or lower than the expected 1.06. Dioxins were associated with a decreased proportion of male births, whereas PCBs were associated with an increased proportion of male births. There was limited evidence for a decrease in the proportion of male births after paternal exposure to DBCP, lead, methylmercury, non-ionizing radiation, ionizing radiation treatment for childhood cancer, boron, or g-forces. Few studies have found higher or lower sex ratios associated with maternal exposures. Studies in humans and animals have found a reduction in the number of male births associated with lower male fertility, but the mechanism by which environmental hazards might change the sex ratio has not yet been established

    Politics ahead of patients: The battle between medical and chiropractic professional associations over the inclusion of chiropractic in the American Medicare System

    Get PDF
    Health care professions struggling for legitimacy, recognition, and market share can become disoriented to their priorities. Health care practitioners are expected to put the interests of patients first. Professional associations represent the interests of their members. So when a professional association is composed of health care practitioners, its interests may differ from those of patients, creating a conflict for members. In addition, sometimes practitioners’ perspectives may be altered by indoctrination in a belief system, or misinformation, so that a practitioner could be confused about the reality of patient needs. Politicians, in attempting to find an expedient compromise, can value a “win” in the legislative arena over the effects of that legislation. These forces all figure into the events that led to the acceptance of chiropractic into the American Medicare system. Two health care systems in a political fight lost sight of their main purpose: to provide care to patients without doing harm. Dans leur recherche de lĂ©gitimitĂ©, de reconnaissance et d’une juste part sur le marchĂ© de la santĂ©, les professionnels de la santĂ© peuvent perdre de vue leurs prioritĂ©s. Ces praticiens doivent donner prĂ©sĂ©ance aux intĂ©rĂȘts des patients tandis que les associations professionnelles reprĂ©sentent ceux de leurs membres. Lorsqu’une association professionnelle regroupe des praticiens de la santĂ© cependant, ses intĂ©rĂȘts s’opposent parfois Ă  ceux des patients, crĂ©ant ainsi un conflit pour les membres. De plus, les praticiens peuvent ĂȘtre endoctrinĂ©s par un systĂšme de valeurs ou mal informĂ©s, au point de se tromper dans l’évaluation des besoins rĂ©els des patients. De leur cĂŽtĂ©, les politiciens peuvent prĂ©fĂ©rer une « victoire » dans l’arĂšne lĂ©gislative Ă  une juste apprĂ©ciation des impacts d’une loi. Ces forces ont toutes participĂ© aux Ă©vĂšnements qui ont menĂ© Ă  l’acceptation de la chiropraxie par le systĂšme amĂ©ricain Medicare. Dans cette bataille politique, deux systĂšmes de santĂ© ont nĂ©gligĂ© leur principal objectif : soigner des patients sans leur nuire

    Orthodoxy and 'The Other Man's Doxy': Medical Licensing and Medical Freedom in the Gilded Age

    No full text
    corecore