4 research outputs found
Usefulness of Body Composition CT Analysis in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Pilot Study
International audiencePURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a chest CT-based body composition analysis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and to investigate the respective contribution of lung and muscle CT quantitative analyses to the prognosis of IPF. METHOD: A total of 71 IPF patients were recruited at diagnosis. All patients underwent a standard chest CT-scan and a bioelectrical impedance analysis considered as reference standard for estimating malnutrition through the use of the fat-free mass index (FFMI). The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured on chest-CT at the level of the first lumbar vertebra by two radiologists. Lung fibrosis extent was quantified by three radiologists in consensus. The extent of emphysema, the pulmonary artery to aorta (PA/AO) diameter ratio and lymph node enlargement were also reported. Mortality and hospitalization over a 14-month follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: A low FFMI defining malnutrition was identified in 26.8% of patients. SMI was significantly lower in these patients (p<0.001) and was correlated with FFMI (r=0.637, p<0.001). Interobserver agreement of SMI measurement was very good (ICC=0.91). For diagnosing malnutrition, SMI showed a 0.79 sensitivity, a 0.69 specificity, a 0.48 PPV and a 0.90 NPV. In univariate analysis, fibrosis extent was significantly associated with death, while SMI did not reach significance. In multivariate analysis, fibrosis extent and PA/AO ratio were independently associated with hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: SMI measured on chest CT could be a reliable tool to exclude malnutrition in IPF. A quantitative analysis of both fibrosis and skeletal muscle may allow holistic management of IPF patients
Study of Thoracic CT in COVID-19: The STOIC Project
International audienc
Strategies to safely rule out pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 outpatients: a multicenter retrospective study
International audienceObjectives: The objective was to define a safe strategy to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 outpatients, without performing CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA).Methods: COVID-19 outpatients from 15 university hospitals who underwent a CTPA were retrospectively evaluated. D-Dimers, variables of the revised Geneva and Wells scores, as well as laboratory findings and clinical characteristics related to COVID-19 pneumonia, were collected. CTPA reports were reviewed for the presence of PE and the extent of COVID-19 disease. PE rule-out strategies were based solely on D-Dimer tests using different thresholds, the revised Geneva and Wells scores, and a COVID-19 PE prediction model built on our dataset were compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), failure rate, and efficiency were calculated.Results: In total, 1369 patients were included of whom 124 were PE positive (9.1%). Failure rate and efficiency of D-Dimer > 500 µg/l were 0.9% (95%CI, 0.2–4.8%) and 10.1% (8.5–11.9%), respectively, increasing to 1.0% (0.2–5.3%) and 16.4% (14.4–18.7%), respectively, for an age-adjusted D-Dimer level. D-dimer > 1000 µg/l led to an unacceptable failure rate to 8.1% (4.4–14.5%). The best performances of the revised Geneva and Wells scores were obtained using the age-adjusted D-Dimer level. They had the same failure rate of 1.0% (0.2–5.3%) for efficiency of 16.8% (14.7–19.1%), and 16.9% (14.8–19.2%) respectively. The developed COVID-19 PE prediction model had an AUC of 0.609 (0.594–0.623) with an efficiency of 20.5% (18.4–22.8%) when its failure was set to 0.8%.Conclusions:The strategy to safely exclude PE in COVID-19 outpatients should not differ from that used in non-COVID-19 patients. The added value of the COVID-19 PE prediction model is minor