94 research outputs found
The Medical Research Council Myeloma IX trial: the impact on treatment paradigms*
Osteolytic bone disease is a hallmark of symptomatic multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates have been the mainstay of treatment to preserve skeletal integrity and prevent skeletal-related events in patients with myeloma-related bone disease. Recently, the MRC Myeloma IX trial demonstrated for the first time improved survival and delayed disease progression with the use of an intravenous amino-bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, vs. an oral agent, clodronate, with intensive and non-intensive anti-myeloma treatment regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These results validate a large body of preclinical, translational and other clinical data suggesting anti-myeloma effects of amino-bisphosphonates. In addition, this trial also provided the first head-to-head evidence for superiority of one bisphosphonate over another (zoledronic acid vs. clodronate) for reducing skeletal morbidity in patients with multiple myeloma, as well as a prospective comparison of toxicities. Despite the use of non-bortezomib containing anti-myeloma treatment regimens in the MRC Myeloma IX trial, these results are encouraging and provide an impetus to continue to evaluate current treatment guidelines for myeloma-associated bone disease
Association between response kinetics and outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis from TOURMALINE-MM1
© The Author(s) 2018.The association between depth of response in multiple myeloma (MM) and long-term outcomes is well recognized [1,2,3]. Thus, clinicians and patients are often encouraged by a rapid decrease of M-protein when treatment is initiated, and achieving ≥very-good partial response (VGPR) by 4 months of initial diagnosis has been associated with decreased mortality [4]. However, little is known about the association between response kinetics and outcomes. While some reports suggest that early responders may have compromised long-term outcomes compared with late responders [5, 6], these studies were limited, confined to frontline setting only, and based in the era prior to novel-agent availability.TOURMALINE-MM1 was sponsored by Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. Writing assistance for this manuscript was provided by Jane Saunders, FireKite (an Ashfield Company, part of UDG Healthcare PLC) and was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc
Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting
Substantial improvements in survival have been seen in multiple myeloma (MM) over recent years, associated with the
introduction and widespread use of multiple novel agents and regimens, as well as the emerging treatment paradigm
of continuous or long-term therapy. However, these therapies and approaches may have limitations in the community
setting, associated with toxicity burden, patient burden, and other factors including cost. Consequently, despite
improvements in efficacy in the rigorously controlled clinical trials setting, the same results are not always achieved in
real-world practice. Furthermore, the large number of different treatment options and regimens under investigation in
various MM settings precludes the feasibility of obtaining head-to-head clinical trial data, and there is a temptation to
use cross-trial comparisons to evaluate data across regimens. However, multiple aspects, including patient-related,
disease-related, and treatment-related factors, can influence clinical trial outcomes and lead to differences between
studies that may confound direct comparisons between data. In this review, we explore the various factors requiring
attention when evaluating clinical trial data across available agents/regimens, as well as other considerations that may
impact the translation of these findings into everyday MM management. We also investigate discrepancies between
clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness through a literature review of non-clinical trial data in relapsed/
refractory MM on novel agent−based regimens and evaluate these data in the context of phase 3 trial results for
recently approved and commonly used regimens. We thereby demonstrate the complexity of interpreting data across
clinical studies in MM, as well as between clinical studies and routine-care analyses, with the aim to help clinicians
consider all the necessary issues when tailoring individual patients’ treatment approaches
Patient-reported outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with melflufen plus dexamethasone : analyses from the Phase II HORIZON study
Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is known to have a high burden of disease and complications associated with refractoriness to prior lines of therapy. Severe pain and fatigue symptoms and impairments in physical and emotional functioning have been strongly linked to reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with RRMM. Assessment of patient reported-outcome measures from the pivotal, Phase II HORIZON study (OP-106; NCT02963493) in patients with RRMM (n = 64) demonstrated that melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone treatment preserved HRQoL. Patients had clinically meaningful improvements, even after eight treatment cycles, in relevant scales such as global health status/QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, pain, and fatigue. Patients with triple-class-refractory disease (n = 50) displayed similar improvements. Patient-reported outcome deterioration was delayed for a substantial amount of time in patients who experienced a response to melflufen plus dexamethasone treatment relative to patients who did not experience a response. These findings support the notion that treatment with melflufen plus dexamethasone may sustain or improve HRQoL over time in patients with RRMM, including in patients with triple-class-refractory disease for whom outcomes are generally worse. The clinical benefits observed in patients from the HORIZON trial are encouraging and supportive of translation into real-world practice
Melflufen and dexamethasone in heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
Clinical trial information: NCT02963493Altres ajuts: Oncopeptides A
The non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag stimulates megakaryopoiesis in bone marrow cells from patients with relapsed multiple myeloma
Addition of elotuzumab to lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed, transplantation ineligible multiple myeloma (ELOQUENT-1): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
Bortezomib in the management of multiple myeloma
Jacob P Laubach, Constantine S Mitsiades, Teru Hideshima, Robert Schlossman, Dharminder Chauhan, Nikhil Munshi, Irene Ghobrial, Nicole Carreau, Kenneth C Anderson, Paul G RichardsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USAAbstract: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by clonal expansion of plasma cells within the bone marrow, the presence of a serum and/or urine monoclonal protein, lytic bone lesions, and anemia. On a cellular level, the disease is characterized by complex interactions between tumor cells and the surrounding bone marrow microenvironment. Understanding of the relationship between malignant plasma cells and the microenvironment has sparked ongoing efforts to develop targeted therapeutic agents for treatment of this disease. The successful development of the first-in-class small-molecule proteasome inhibitor bortezomib occurred as a result of these efforts. This review focuses on the rationale for bortezomib therapy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed MM, important treatment-related side effects, and future directions for use of bortezomib and other, emerging proteasome inhibitors.Keywords: multiple myeloma, bortezomib, stem cell transplantation, peripheral neuropath
- …