13 research outputs found
Proxy Measures of Fitness Suggest Coastal Fish Farms Can Act as Population Sources and Not Ecological Traps for Wild Gadoid Fish
Background: Ecological traps form when artificial structures are added to natural habitats and induce mismatches between
habitat preferences and fitness consequences. Their existence in terrestrial systems has been documented, yet little evidence suggests they occur in marine environments. Coastal fish farms are widespread artificial structures in coastal ecosystems and are highly attractive to wild fish. Methodology/Principal Findings: To investigate if coastal salmon farms act as ecological traps for wild Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and saithe (Pollachius virens), we compared proxy measures of fitness between farm-associated fish and control fish caught distant from farms in nine locations throughout coastal Norway, the largest coastal fish farming industry in the world. Farms modified wild fish diets in both quality and quantity, thereby providing farm-associated wild fish with a strong trophic subsidy. This translated to greater somatic (saithe: 1.06–1.12 times; cod: 1.06–1.11 times) and liver condition indices (saithe: 1.4–1.8 times; cod: 2.0–2.8 times) than control fish caught distant from farms. Parasite loads of farm-associated wild fish were modified from control fish, with increased external and decreased internal parasites, however the strong effect of the trophic subsidy overrode any effects of altered loads upon condition. Conclusions and Significance: Proxy measures of fitness provided no evidence that salmon farms function as ecological traps for wild fish. We suggest fish farms may act as population sources for wild fish, provided they are protected from fishing while resident at farms to allow their increased condition to manifest as greater reproductive output.Funding was provided by the Norwegian Research Council Havet og kysten program to the CoastACE project (no: 173384)
Relative Impacts of Adult Movement, Larval Dispersal and Harvester Movement on the Effectiveness of Reserve Networks
Movement of individuals is a critical factor determining the effectiveness of
reserve networks. Marine reserves have historically been used for the management
of species that are sedentary as adults, and, therefore, larval dispersal has
been a major focus of marine-reserve research. The push to use marine reserves
for managing pelagic and demersal species poses significant questions regarding
their utility for highly-mobile species. Here, a simple conceptual
metapopulation model is developed to provide a rigorous comparison of the
functioning of reserve networks for populations with different admixtures of
larval dispersal and adult movement in a home range. We find that adult movement
produces significantly lower persistence than larval dispersal, all other
factors being equal. Furthermore, redistribution of harvest effort previously in
reserves to remaining fished areas (‘fishery squeeze’) and fishing
along reserve borders (‘fishing-the-line’) considerably reduce
persistence and harvests for populations mobile as adults, while they only
marginally changes results for populations with dispersing larvae. Our results
also indicate that adult home-range movement and larval dispersal are not simply
additive processes, but rather that populations possessing both modes of
movement have lower persistence than equivalent populations having the same
amount of ‘total movement’ (sum of larval and adult movement spatial
scales) in either larval dispersal or adult movement alone