43 research outputs found
Managing Wicked Herbicide-Resistance: Lessons from the Field
Herbicide resistance is âwickedâ in nature; therefore, results of the many educational efforts to encourage diversification of weed control practices in the United States have been mixed. It is clear that we do not sufficiently understand the totality of the grassroots obstacles, concerns, challenges, and specific solutions needed for varied crop production systems. Weed management issues and solutions vary with such variables as management styles, regions, cropping systems, and available or affordable technologies. Therefore, to help the weed science community better understand the needs and ideas of those directly dealing with herbicide resistance, seven half-day regional listening sessions were held across the United States between December 2016 and April 2017 with groups of diverse stakeholders on the issues and potential solutions for herbicide resistance management. The major goals of the sessions were to gain an understanding of stakeholders and their goals and concerns related to herbicide resistance management, to become familiar with regional differences, and to identify decision maker needs to address herbicide resistance. The messages shared by listening-session participants could be summarized by six themes: we need new herbicides; there is no need for more regulation; there is a need for more education, especially for others who were not present; diversity is hard; the agricultural economy makes it difficult to make changes; and we are aware of herbicide resistance but are managing it. The authors concluded that more work is needed to bring a community-wide, interdisciplinary approach to understanding the complexity of managing weeds within the context of the whole farm operation and for communicating the need to address herbicide resistance
Managing Herbicide Resistance: Listening to the Perspectives of Practitioners. Procedures for Conducting Listening Sessions and an Evaluation of the Process
Seven half-day regional listening sessions were held between December 2016 and April 2017 with groups of diverse stakeholders on the issues and potential solutions for herbicide-resistance management. The objective of the listening sessions was to connect with stakeholders and hear their challenges and recommendations for addressing herbicide resistance. The coordinating team hired Strategic Conservation Solutions, LLC, to facilitate all the sessions. They and the coordinating team used in-person meetings, teleconferences, and email to communicate and coordinate the activities leading up to each regional listening session. The agenda was the same across all sessions and included small-group discussions followed by reporting to the full group for discussion. The planning process was the same across all the sessions, although the selection of venue, time of day, and stakeholder participants differed to accommodate the differences among regions. The listening-session format required a great deal of work and flexibility on the part of the coordinating team and regional coordinators. Overall, the participant evaluations from the sessions were positive, with participants expressing appreciation that they were asked for their thoughts on the subject of herbicide resistance. This paper details the methods and processes used to conduct these regional listening sessions and provides an assessment of the strengths and limitations of those processes
Managing Wicked Herbicide-Resistance: Lessons from the Field
Herbicide resistance is âwickedâ in nature; therefore, results of the many educational efforts to encourage diversification of weed control practices in the United States have been mixed. It is clear that we do not sufficiently understand the totality of the grassroots obstacles, concerns, challenges, and specific solutions needed for varied crop production systems. Weed management issues and solutions vary with such variables as management styles, regions, cropping systems, and available or affordable technologies. Therefore, to help the weed science community better understand the needs and ideas of those directly dealing with herbicide resistance, seven half-day regional listening sessions were held across the United States between December 2016 and April 2017 with groups of diverse stakeholders on the issues and potential solutions for herbicide resistance management. The major goals of the sessions were to gain an understanding of stakeholders and their goals and concerns related to herbicide resistance management, to become familiar with regional differences, and to identify decision maker needs to address herbicide resistance. The messages shared by listening-session participants could be summarized by six themes: we need new herbicides; there is no need for more regulation; there is a need for more education, especially for others who were not present; diversity is hard; the agricultural economy makes it difficult to make changes; and we are aware of herbicide resistance but are managing it. The authors concluded that more work is needed to bring a community-wide, interdisciplinary approach to understanding the complexity of managing weeds within the context of the whole farm operation and for communicating the need to address herbicide resistance
Impact of TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles on Growth, Biofilm Formation, and Flavin Secretion in <i>Shewanella oneidensis</i>
Understanding of nanoparticle impacts
on critical bacteria functions
allows us to gain a mechanistic understanding of toxicity and guides
us toward design rules for creating safe nanomaterials. Herein, biofilm
formation, a general bacteria function, and riboflavin secretion,
a species-specific function, were monitored in <i>Shewanella
oneidensis</i>, a metal reducing bacterium, following exposure
to a variety of TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticle types (synthesized, Aeroxide
P25, and T-Eco). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images show
that dosed nanoparticles are in close proximity to the bacteria, but
they are not internalized. Using quartz crystal microbalance (QCM),
it was revealed that <i>S. oneidensis</i> biofilm formation
is slowed in the presence of nanoparticles. Though <i>S. oneidensis</i> grows more slowly in the presence of TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles,
riboflavin secretion, a function related to the <i>S. oneidensis</i> metal reducing capacity, was increased significantly in a nanoparticle
dose-dependent manner. Both changes in biofilm formation and riboflavin
secretion are supported by changes in gene expression in nanoparticle-exposed <i>S. oneidensis</i>. This broad study of bacterial nanotoxicity,
including use of sensitive analytical tools for functional assessments
of biofilm formation, riboflavin secretion, and gene expression, has
implications for total ecosystem health as the use of engineered nanoparticles
grows