10 research outputs found

    Commit* to change? A call to end the publication of the phrase โ€˜commit* suicideโ€™

    Get PDF
    Background: Countering stigma is a fundamental facet of suicide prevention efforts. Integral to this is the promotion of accurate and sensitive language. The phrase โ€˜commit* suicideโ€™ has prompted marked opposition primarily due to the connotations of immorality and illegality. Methods: The study investigated the frequency of the use of the wordstem โ€˜commitโ€™, in relation to self-harm and suicidal behaviours, in the three leading suicide-specific academic journals between 2000 and 2015. Results: One third (34%) of articles published since the year 2000 used the word โ€˜commit*โ€™ when describing an act of self-harm or suicide. Over half of these articles (57%) used the phrase on more than one occasion, with 6% using it more than 10 times in the same manuscript. The percentage of papers utilising the word โ€˜commit*โ€™ has fluctuated over time, but there is a promising downward trend in the use of this phrase from 33% in 2000 to 13% in 2015 (p < 0.001). Discussion: We advocate for the implementation of publication requirements regarding the language used when discussing suicide. Whilst we call for collective responsibility amongst academics and clinicians, editors hold a unique position in ensuring that outdated, inaccurate and stigma-laden terms are expunged from the scientific literature

    The Moderating Effects of Permissive Attitude toward Suicide and Experience of Suicide Loss on the Relationship between Depression and Suicidality

    No full text

    Factors Affecting Stigma against Older Adults: A Comparison of Two Age Groups

    No full text
    corecore