Allogamy-Autogamy Switch Enhance Assortative Mating in the Allotetraploid Centaurea seridis L. Coexisting with the Diploid Centaurea aspera L. and Triggers the Asymmetrical Formation of Triploid Hybrids

[EN] Hybridization between tetraploids and its related diploids is generally unsuccessful in Centaurea, hence natural formation of triploid hybrids is rare. In contrast, the diploid Centaurea aspera and the allotetraploid C. seridis coexist in several contact zones where a high frequency of triploid hybrids is found. We analyzed the floral biology of the three taxa to identify reproductive isolation mechanisms that allow their coexistence. Flowering phenology was recorded, and controlled pollinations within and between the three taxa were performed in the field. Ploidy level and germination of progeny were also assessed. There was a 50% flowering overlap which indicated a phenological shift. Diploids were strictly allogamous and did not display mentor effects, while tetraploids were found to be highly autogamous. This breakdown of self-incompatibility by polyploids is first described in Centaurea. The asymmetrical formation of the hybrid was also found: all the triploid intact cypselae came from the diploid mothers pollinated by the pollen of tetraploids. Pollen and eggs from triploids were totally sterile, acting as a strong triploid block. These prezygotic isolation mechanisms ensured higher assortative mating in tetraploids than in diploids, improving its persistence in the contact zones. However these mechanisms can also be the cause of the low genetic diversity and high genetic structure observed in C. seridis.Ferriol Molina, M.; Garmendia, A.; Ana Gonzalez; Merle Farinós, HB. (2015). Allogamy-Autogamy Switch Enhance Assortative Mating in the Allotetraploid Centaurea seridis L. Coexisting with the Diploid Centaurea aspera L. and Triggers the Asymmetrical Formation of Triploid Hybrids. PLoS ONE. 10(10):1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140465S1131010Jiao, Y., Wickett, N. J., Ayyampalayam, S., Chanderbali, A. S., Landherr, L., Ralph, P. E., … dePamphilis, C. W. (2011). Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature, 473(7345), 97-100. doi:10.1038/nature09916Wood, T. E., Takebayashi, N., Barker, M. S., Mayrose, I., Greenspoon, P. B., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2009). The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(33), 13875-13879. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811575106ROMASCHENKO, K., ERTUǦRUL, K., SUSANNA, A., GARCIA-JACAS, N., UYSAL, T., & ARSLAN, E. (2004). New chromosome counts in the Centaurea Jacea group (Asteraceae, Cardueae) and some related taxa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 145(3), 345-352. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00292.xHardy, O. J., de Loose, M., Vekemans, X., & Meerts, P. (2001). Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea. Heredity, 87(2), 136-145. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00862.xKOUTECKÝ, P., BAĎUROVÁ, T., ŠTECH, M., KOŠNAR, J., & KARÁSEK, J. (2011). Hybridization between diploidCentaurea pseudophrygiaand tetraploidC. jacea(Asteraceae): the role of mixed pollination, unreduced gametes, and mentor effects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104(1), 93-106. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01707.xKoutecký, P. (2012). A diploid drop in the tetraploid ocean: hybridization and long-term survival of a singular population of Centaurea weldeniana Rchb. (Asteraceae), a taxon new to Austria. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298(7), 1349-1360. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0641-5Mráz, P., Španiel, S., Keller, A., Bowmann, G., Farkas, A., Šingliarová, B., … Müller-Schärer, H. (2012). Anthropogenic disturbance as a driver of microspatial and microhabitat segregation of cytotypes of Centaurea stoebe and cytotype interactions in secondary contact zones. Annals of Botany, 110(3), 615-627. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs120Olšavská, K., & Löser, C. J. (2013). Mating System and Hybridization of the Cyanus triumfetti and C. montanus Groups (Asteraceae). Folia Geobotanica, 48(4), 537-554. doi:10.1007/s12224-013-9155-3Španiel, S., Marhold, K., Hodálová, I., & Lihová, J. (2008). Diploid and Tetraploid Cytotypes of Centaurea stoebe (Asteraceae) in Central Europe: Morphological Differentiation and Cytotype Distribution Patterns. Folia Geobotanica, 43(2), 131-158. doi:10.1007/s12224-008-9008-7HARDY, O. J., VANDERHOEVEN, S., DE LOOSE, M., & MEERTS, P. (2000). Ecological, morphological and allozymic differentiation between diploid and tetraploid knapweeds (Centaurea jacea) from a contact zone in the Belgian Ardennes. New Phytologist, 146(2), 281-290. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00631.xFerriol, M., Garmendia, A., Ruiz, J. J., Merle, H., & Boira, H. (2012). Morphological and molecular analysis of natural hybrids between the diploidCentaurea asperaL. and the tetraploidC. seridisL. (Compositae). Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 146(sup1), 86-100. doi:10.1080/11263504.2012.727878Ferriol, M., Merle, H., & Garmendia, A. (2014). Microsatellite evidence for low genetic diversity and reproductive isolation in tetraploidCentaurea seridis(Asteraceae) coexisting with diploidCentaurea asperaand triploid hybrids in contact zones. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 176(1), 82-98. doi:10.1111/boj.12194Garmendia, A., Ferriol, M., Juarez, J., Zając, A., Kałużny, K., & Merle, H. (2015). A rare case of a natural contact zone in Morocco between an autopolyploid and an allopolyploid ofCentaurea asperawith sterile tetraploid hybrids. Plant Biology, 17(3), 746-757. doi:10.1111/plb.12284Petit, C., Bretagnolle, F., & Felber, F. (1999). Evolutionary consequences of diploid–polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(8), 306-311. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01608-0Thorsson, A. T., Palsson, S., Sigurgeirsson, A., & Anamthawat-Jonsson, K. (2007). Morphological Variation among Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their Triploid Hybrids in Iceland. Annals of Botany, 99(6), 1183-1193. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm060Husband And, B. C., & Schemske, D. W. (2000). Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploidChamerion angustifolium. Journal of Ecology, 88(4), 689-701. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00481.xKruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple Comparisons among Means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52-64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090HARVILLE, D. A. (1974). Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts. Biometrika, 61(2), 383-385. doi:10.1093/biomet/61.2.383McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1269547Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307. doi:10.2307/1912557Ferriol, M., Llorens, L., Gil, L., & Boira, H. (2008). Influence of phenological barriers and habitat differentiation on the population genetic structure of the balearic endemic Rhamnus ludovici-salvatoris Chodat and R. alaternus L. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 277(1-2), 105-116. doi:10.1007/s00606-008-0110-3Colas, B., Olivieri, I., & Riba, M. (2001). Spatio-temporal variation of reproductive success and conservation of the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation, 99(3), 375-386. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00229-9Felber, F., & Bever, J. D. (1997). Effect of triploid fitness on the coexistence of diploids and tetraploids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 60(1), 95-106. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01485.xPeckert, T., & Chrtek, J. (2006). Mating interactions between coexisting dipoloid, triploid and tetraploid cytotypes ofHieracium Echioides (Asteraceae). Folia Geobotanica, 41(3), 323-334. doi:10.1007/bf02904945HUSBAND, B. C. (2004). The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 82(4), 537-546. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00339.xStebbins, G. L. (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. doi:10.7312/steb94536Barringer, B. C. (2007). Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany, 94(9), 1527-1533. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.9.1527Borges, L. A., Souza, L. G. R., Guerra, M., Machado, I. C., Lewis, G. P., & Lopes, A. V. (2012). Reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Libidibia ferrea (= Caesalpinia ferrea) (Leguminosae): ecological and taxonomic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298(7), 1371-1381. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0643-3Greiner, R., & Oberprieler, C. (2012). The role of inter-ploidy block for reproductive isolation of the diploid Leucanthemum pluriflorum Pau (Compositae, Anthemideae) and its tetra- and hexaploid relatives. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 207(9), 629-635. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2012.07.001Ferrer, M. M., & Good-Avila, S. V. (2006). Macrophylogenetic analyses of the gain and loss of self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae. New Phytologist, 173(2), 401-414. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01905.xSun, M., & Ritland, K. (1998). Mating system of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a successful colonizer in North America. Heredity, 80(2), 225-232. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00290.xHusband, B. C., & Sabara, H. A. (2003). Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytologist, 161(3), 703-713. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2004.00998.xAwadalla, P., & Ritland, K. (1997). Microsatellite variation and evolution in the Mimulus guttatus species complex with contrasting mating systems. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14(10), 1023-1034. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025708Reinartz, J. A., & Les, D. H. (1994). Bottleneck-Induced Dissolution of Self-Incompatibility and Breeding System Consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany, 81(4), 446. doi:10.2307/2445494Hiscock, S. J. (2000). Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species. Heredity, 85(1), 10-19. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00692.xNIELSEN, L. R., SIEGISMUND, H. R., & PHILIPP, M. (2003). Partial self-incompatibility in the polyploid endemic species Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from the Galápagos: remnants of a self-incompatibility system? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 142(1), 93-101. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00168.xSonnleitner, M., Weis, B., Flatscher, R., García, P. E., Suda, J., Krejčíková, J., … Hülber, K. (2013). Parental Ploidy Strongly Affects Offspring Fitness in Heteroploid Crosses among Three Cytotypes of Autopolyploid Jacobaea carniolica (Asteraceae). PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078959Cui, C., Ge, X., Gautam, M., Kang, L., & Li, Z. (2012). Cytoplasmic and Genomic Effects on Meiotic Pairing inBrassicaHybrids and Allotetraploids from Pair Crosses of Three Cultivated Diploids. Genetics, 191(3), 725-738. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140780Comai, L. (2005). The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(11), 836-846. doi:10.1038/nrg1711Mráz, P. (2003). Mentor effects in the genusHieracium S.STR. (Compositae, Lactuceae). Folia Geobotanica, 38(3), 345-350. doi:10.1007/bf02803204Husband, B. C., Schemske, D. W., Burton, T. L., & Goodwillie, C. (2002). Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1509), 2565-2571. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2196Baldwin, S. J., & Husband, B. C. (2010). Genome duplication and the evolution of conspecific pollen precedence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 2011-2017. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.220

Expression and trans-specific polymorphism of self-incompatibility RNases in Coffea (Rubiaceae)

Self-incompatibility (SI) is widespread in the angiosperms, but identifying the biochemical components of SI mechanisms has proven to be difficult in most lineages. Coffea (coffee; Rubiaceae) is a genus of old-world tropical understory trees in which the vast majority of diploid species utilize a mechanism of gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI). The S-RNase GSI system was one of the first SI mechanisms to be biochemically characterized, and likely represents the ancestral Eudicot condition as evidenced by its functional characterization in both asterid (Solanaceae, Plantaginaceae) and rosid (Rosaceae) lineages. The S-RNase GSI mechanism employs the activity of class III RNase T2 proteins to terminate the growth of "self" pollen tubes. Here, we investigate the mechanism of Coffea GSI and specifically examine the potential for homology to S-RNase GSI by sequencing class III RNase T2 genes in populations of 14 African and Madagascan Coffea species and the closely related self-compatible species Psilanthus ebracteolatus. Phylogenetic analyses of these sequences aligned to a diverse sample of plant RNase T2 genes show that the Coffea genome contains at least three class III RNase T2 genes. Patterns of tissue-specific gene expression identify one of these RNase T2 genes as the putative Coffea S-RNase gene. We show that populations of SI Coffea are remarkably polymorphic for putative S-RNase alleles, and exhibit a persistent pattern of trans-specific polymorphism characteristic of all S-RNase genes previously isolated from GSI Eudicot lineages. We thus conclude that Coffea GSI is most likely homologous to the classic Eudicot S-RNase system, which was retained since the divergence of the Rubiaceae lineage from an ancient SI Eudicot ancestor, nearly 90 million years ago.United States National Science Foundation [0849186]; Society of Systematic Biologists; American Society of Plant Taxonomists; Duke University Graduate Schoolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

The Environmental Dependence of Inbreeding Depression in a Wild Bird Population

BACKGROUND: Inbreeding depression occurs when the offspring produced as a result of matings between relatives show reduced fitness, and is generally understood as a consequence of the elevated expression of deleterious recessive alleles. How inbreeding depression varies across environments is of importance for the evolution of inbreeding avoidance behaviour, and for understanding extinction risks in small populations. However, inbreeding-by-environment (IxE) interactions have rarely been investigated in wild populations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We analysed 41 years of breeding events from a wild great tit (Parus major) population and used 11 measures of the environment to categorise environments as relatively good or poor, testing whether these measures influenced inbreeding depression. Although inbreeding always, and environmental quality often, significantly affected reproductive success, there was little evidence for statistically significant I x E interactions at the level of individual analyses. However, point estimates of the effect of the environment on inbreeding depression were sometimes considerable, and we show that variation in the magnitude of the I x E interaction across environments is consistent with the expectation that this interaction is more marked across environmental axes with a closer link to overall fitness, with the environmental dependence of inbreeding depression being elevated under such conditions. Hence, our analyses provide evidence for an environmental dependence of the inbreeding x environment interaction: effectively an I x E x E. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, our analyses suggest that I x E interactions may be substantial in wild populations, when measured across relevant environmental contrasts, although their detection for single traits may require very large samples, or high rates of inbreeding

Transcriptome characterization and polymorphism detection between subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Big sagebrush (<it>Artemisia tridentata</it>) is one of the most widely distributed and ecologically important shrub species in western North America. This species serves as a critical habitat and food resource for many animals and invertebrates. Habitat loss due to a combination of disturbances followed by establishment of invasive plant species is a serious threat to big sagebrush ecosystem sustainability. Lack of genomic data has limited our understanding of the evolutionary history and ecological adaptation in this species. Here, we report on the sequencing of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and detection of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in subspecies of big sagebrush.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>cDNA of <it>A. tridentata </it>sspp. <it>tridentata </it>and <it>vaseyana </it>were normalized and sequenced using the 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencing technology. Assembly of the reads resulted in 20,357 contig consensus sequences in ssp. <it>tridentata </it>and 20,250 contigs in ssp. <it>vaseyana</it>. A BLASTx search against the non-redundant (NR) protein database using 29,541 consensus sequences obtained from a combined assembly resulted in 21,436 sequences with significant blast alignments (≤ 1e^-15). A total of 20,952 SNPs and 119 polymorphic SSRs were detected between the two subspecies. SNPs were validated through various methods including sequence capture. Validation of SNPs in different individuals uncovered a high level of nucleotide variation in EST sequences. EST sequences of a third, tetraploid subspecies (ssp. <it>wyomingensis</it>) obtained by Illumina sequencing were mapped to the consensus sequences of the combined 454 EST assembly. Approximately one-third of the SNPs between sspp. <it>tridentata </it>and <it>vaseyana </it>identified in the combined assembly were also polymorphic within the two geographically distant ssp. <it>wyomingensis </it>samples.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have produced a large EST dataset for <it>Artemisia tridentata</it>, which contains a large sample of the big sagebrush leaf transcriptome. SNP mapping among the three subspecies suggest the origin of ssp. <it>wyomingensis </it>via mixed ancestry. A large number of SNP and SSR markers provide the foundation for future research to address questions in big sagebrush evolution, ecological genetics, and conservation using genomic approaches.</p

On the origin of the invasive olives (Olea europaea L., Oleaceae).

The olive tree (Olea europaea) has successfully invaded several regions in Australia and Pacific islands. Two olive subspecies (subspp. europaea and cuspidata) were first introduced in these areas during the nineteenth century. In the present study, we determine the origin of invasive olives and investigate the importance of historical effects on the genetic diversity of populations. Four invasive populations from Australia and Hawaii were characterized using eight nuclear DNA microsatellites, plastid DNA markers as well as ITS-1 sequences. Based on these data, their genetic similarity with native populations was investigated, and it was determined that East Australian and Hawaiian populations (subsp. cuspidata) have originated from southern Africa while South Australian populations (subsp. europaea) have mostly derived from western or central Mediterranean cultivars. Invasive populations of subsp. cuspidata showed significant loss of genetic diversity in comparison to a putative source population, and a recent bottleneck was evidenced in Hawaii. Conversely, invasive populations of subsp. europaea did not display significant loss of genetic diversity in comparison to a native Mediterranean population. Different histories of invasion were inferred for these two taxa with multiple cultivars introduced restoring gene diversity for europaea and a single successful founder event and sequential introductions to East Australia and then Hawaii for cuspidata. Furthermore, one hybrid (cuspidata x europaea) was identified in East Australia. The importance of hybridizations in the future evolution of the olive invasiveness remains to be investigated

Conservation genetics of the annual hemiparasitic plant Melampyrum sylvaticum (Orobanchaceae) in the UK and Scandinavia

Melampyrum sylvaticum is an endangered annual hemiparasitic plant that is found in only 19 small and isolated populations in the United Kingdom (UK). To evaluate the genetic consequences of this patchy distribution we compared levels of diversity, inbreeding and differentiation from ten populations from the UK with eight relatively large populations from Sweden and Norway where the species is more continuously distributed. We demonstrate that in both the UK and Scandinavia, the species is highly inbreeding (global F IS = 0.899). Levels of population differentiation were high (F’ST = 0.892) and significantly higher amongst UK populations (F’ST = 0.949) than Scandinavian populations (F’ST = 0.762; P < 0.01). The isolated populations in the UK have, on average, lower genetic diversity (allelic richness, proportion of loci that are polymorphic, gene diversity) than Scandinavian populations, and this diversity difference is associated with the smaller census size and population area of UK populations. From a conservation perspective, the naturally inbreeding nature of the species may buffer the species against immediate effects of inbreeding depression, but the markedly lower levels of genetic diversity in UK populations may represent a genetic constraint to evolutionary change. In addition, the high levels of population differentiation suggest that gene flow among populations will not be effective at replenishing lost variation. We thus recommend supporting in situ conservation management with ex situ populations and human-mediated seed dispersal among selected populations in the UK

Variation of selfing rate and inbreeding depression among individuals and across generations within an admixed Cedrus population

[EN] We investigated the variation and short-term evolution of the selfing rate and inbreeding depression (ID) across three generations within a cedar forest that was established from admixture ca 1860. The mean selfing rate was 9.5%, ranging from 0 to 48% among 20 seed trees (estimated from paternally inherited chloroplast DNA). We computed the probability of selfing for each seed and we investigated ID by comparing selfed and outcrossed seeds within progenies, thus avoiding maternal effects. In all progenies, the germination rate was high (88-100%) and seedling mortality was low (0-12%). The germination dynamics differed significantly between selfed and outcrossed seeds within progenies in the founder gene pool but not in the following generations. This transient effect of selfing could be attributed to epistatic interactions in the original admixture. Regarding the seedling growth traits, the ID was low but significant: 8 and 6% for height and diameter growth, respectively. These rates did not vary among generations, suggesting minor gene effects. At this early stage, outcrossed seedlings outcompeted their selfed relatives, but not necessarily other selfed seedlings from other progenies. Thus, purging these slightly deleterious genes may only occur through within-family selection. Processes that maintain a high level of genetic diversity for fitness-related traits among progenies also reduce the efficiency of purging this part of the genetic load. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved. Guardar / Salir Siguiente >This work has been partially supported by Grant PPI-00-04 from the Polytechnic University of Valencia (Spain). We thank B Fady and E Klein as well as two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on a previous version of the paper. We acknowledge B Jouaud, W Brunetto, F Jean and H Picot for seed collection and processing and laboratory assistance, as well as P Brahic and staff from the Experimental Nursery of Aix-Les Milles for nursery cares.Ferriol Molina, M.; Pichot, C.; Lefevre, F. (2011). Variation of selfing rate and inbreeding depression among individuals and across generations within an admixed Cedrus population. Heredity. 106(1):146-157. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.451461571061Barret SH, Eckert CG (1990). Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In: Kawano S (ed). Biological Approaches and Evolutionary Trends in Plants. Academic Press: London. pp 230–254.Benton TG, Plaistow SJ, Coulson TN (2006). Complex population dynamics and complex causation: devils, details and demography. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273: 1173–1181.Bower AD, Aitken SN (2007). Mating system and inbreeding depression in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.). Tree Genet Genomes 3: 379–388.Byers DL, Waller DM (1999). Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 479–513.Cointat M (1996). Le roman du cèdre. Revue Forestière Française 48: 503–526.Collevatti RG, Grattapaglia D, Duvall J (2001). High resolution microsatellite based analysis of the mating system allows the detection of significant biparental inbreeding in Caryocar brasiliense, an endangered tropical tree species. Heredity 86: 60–67.Cottrell JE, White IMS (1995). The use of isozyme genetic markers to estimate the rate of outcrossing in a Sitka pruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) seed orchard in Scotland. New Forests 10: 111–122.Coulson T, Benton TG, Lundberg P, Dall SRX, Kendall BE (2006). Putting evolutionary biology back in the ecological theatre: a demographic framework mapping genes to communities. Evol Ecol Res 8: 1155–1171.Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996). Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92: 347–356.Eriksson E (2006). Thinning operations and their impact on biomass production in stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine. Biomass Bioenergy 30: 848–854.Fady B, Lefèvre F, Reynaud M, Vendramin GG, Bou Dagher-Karrat M, Anzidei M et al. (2003). Gene flow among different taxonomic units: evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers in Cedrus plantation forests. Theor Appl Genet 107: 1132–1138.Farris MA, Mitton JB (1984). Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygote superiority in ponderosa pine. Evolution 38: 1151–1154.Favre-Duchartre M (1970). Des Ovules Aux Graines. Monographie 8. Masson et Cie.: Paris.Franklin EC (1969). Inbreeding Depression in Metrical Traits of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) as a Result of Self-pollination. North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC. Technical report No 40, School of Forest Resources.Gregorius HR, Ziehe M, Ross MD (1987). Selection caused by self-fertilization I. Four measures of self-fertilization and their effects on fitness. Theor Popul Biol 31: 91–115.Hamrick JL, Godt MJ (1989). Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Al Kahler MC, Weir BS (eds). Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA. pp 43–63.Holsinger KE (1991). Mass-action models of plant mating systems—the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. Am Nat 138: 606–622.Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996). Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54–70.Jones FA, Hamrick JL, Peterson CJ, Squiers ER (2006). Inferring colonization history from analyses of spatial genetic structure within populations of Pinus strobus and Quercus rubra. Mol Ecol 15: 851–861.Kärkkäinen K, Savolainen O (1993). The degree of early inbreeding depression determines the selfing rate at the seed stage: model and results from Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine). Heredity 71: 160–166.Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230–241.Klein EK, Lavigne C, Gouyon PH (2006). Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing an exponential tail to an exponential. BMC Ecol 6: 3.Knowles P, Furnier GR, Aleksiuk MK, Perry DJ (1987). Significant levels of self-fertilization in natural populations of tamarack. Can J Bot 65: 1087–1091.Koelewijn HP, Koski V, Savolainen O (1999). Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Evolution 53: 758–768.Kremer A (1994). Genetic diversity and phenotypic variability of forest trees. Genet Sel Evol 26: s105–s123.Krouchi F, Derridj A, Lefèvre F (2004). Year and tree effect on reproductive organisation of Cedrus atlantica in a natural forest. For Ecol Manage 197: 181–189.Lande R (1988). Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455–1460.Ledig FT (1986). Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. In: Soulé ME (ed). Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Ass: Sunderland. pp 77–104.Lee JK, Nordheim EV, Kang H (1996). Inference for lethal gene estimation with application in plants. Biometrics 52: 451–462.Lefèvre F, Fady B, Fallour-Rubio D, Ghosn D, Bariteau M (2004). Impact of founder population, drift and selection on the genetic diversity of a recently translocated tree population. Heredity 93: 542–550.Marquardt PE, Epperson BK (2004). Spatial and population genetic structure of microsatellites in white pine. Mol Ecol 13: 3305–3315.Morgante M, Vendramin GG, Rossi P (1991). Effects of stand density on outcrossing rate in two Norway spruce (Picea abies) populations. Can J Bot 69: 2704–2708.Mosseler A, Major JE, Simpson JD, Daigle B, Lange K, Park YS et al. (2000). Indicators of population viability in red spruce, Picea rubens. I. Reproductive traits and fecundity. Can J Bot 78: 928–940.Naydenov KD, Tremblay FM, Alexandrov A, Fenton NJ (2005). Structure of Pinus sylvestris L. populations in Bulgaria revealed by chloroplast microsatellites and terpenes analysis : provenance tests. Biochem Syst Ecol 33: 1226–1245.Neale DB, Adams WT (1985). The mating system in natural and shelterwood stands of Douglas-fir. Theor Appl Genet 71: 201–207.Notivol E, Garcia-Gil MR, Alia R, Savolainen O (2007). Genetic variation of growth rhythm traits in the limits of a latitudinal cline in Scots pine. Can J For Res 37: 540–551.O’Connell LM, Russell J, Ritland K (2004). Fine-scale estimation of outcrossing in western redcedar with microsatellite assay of bulked DNA. Heredity 93: 443–449.Parducci L, Szmidt AE, Madaghiele A, Anzidei M, Vendramin GG (2001). Genetic variation at chloroplast microsatellites (CpSSRs) in Abies nebrodensis (Lojac.) Mattei and three neighboring Abies species. Theor Appl Genet 102: 733–740.Parraguirre-Lezama C, Vargas-Hernández JJ, Ramirez-Vallejo P, Ramirez Herrera C (2004). Mating system in four natural populations of Pinus greggii Engelm. Agrociencia 38: 107–119.Petit RJ, Hampe A (2006). Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 187–214.Pichot C, Bastien C, Courbet F, Demesure-Musch B, Dreyfus P, Fady B et al. (2006). Déterminants et conséquences de la qualité génétique des graines et semis lors de la phase initiale de régénération naturelle des peuplements forestiers. In: 6e Colloque National du BRG ; La Rochelle 2006/10/02-04. Les Actes du Bureau des Ressources Génétiques 6: 277–297.Remington DL, O’Malley DM (2000a). Whole-genome characterization of embryonic stage inbreeding depression in a selfed loblolly pine family. Genetics 155: 337–348.Remington DL, O’Malley DM (2000b). Evaluation of major genetic loci contributing to inbreeding depression for survival and early growth in a selfed family of Pinus taeda. Evolution 54: 1580–1589.Restoux G, Silva DE, Sagnard F, Torre F, Klein E, Fady B (2008). Life at the margin: the mating system of Mediterranean conifers. Web Ecol 8: 94–102.Ribeiro MM, Mariette S, Vendramin GG, Szmidt AE, Plomion C, Kremer A (2002). Comparison of genetic diversity estimates within and among populations of maritime pine using chloroplast simple-sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data. Mol Ecol 11: 869–877.Ritland K, El-Kassaby YA (1985). The nature of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Douglas fir as shown by an efficient multi-locus model. Theor Appl Genet 71: 375–384.Ritland K, Travis S (2004). Inferences involving individual coefficients of relatedness and inbreeding in natural populations of Abies. For Ecol Manage 197: 171–180.Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Alia R, Gil L (2004). Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol 13: 2567–2577.Rouault G, Turgeon J, Candau JN, Roques A, Aderkas P (2004). Oviposition strategies of conifer seed chalcids in relation to host phenology. Naturwissenschaften 91: 472–480.Savolainen O, Kärkkäinen K, Kuittinen H (1992). Estimating numbers of embryonic lethals in conifers. Heredity 69: 308–314.Scofield DG, Schultz ST (2006). Mitosis, stature and evolution of plant mating systems: low-Phi and high-Phi plants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273: 275–282.Shaw DV, Allard RW (1982). Estimation of outcrossing rates in douglas-fir using isoenzyme markers. Theor Appl Genet 62: 113–120.Skrøppa T (1996). Diallel crosses in Picea abies. II. Performance and inbreeding depression of selfed families. For Genet 3: 69–79.Sorensen FC (1997). Effects of sib mating and wind pollination on nursery seedling size, growth components, and phenology of Douglas-fir seed-orchard progenies. Can J For Res 27: 557–566.Sorensen FC (1999). Relationship between self-fertility, allocation of growth, and inbreeding depression in three coniferous species. Evolution 53: 417–425.Sorensen FC (2001). Effect of population outcrossing rate on inbreeding depression in Pinus contorta var. murrayana seedlings. Scand J For Res 16: 391–403.Sorensen FC, Adams WT (1993). Self fertility and natural selfing in three Oregon Cascade populations of lodgepole pine. In: Lindgren D (ed). Pinus contorta—From Untamed Forest to Domesticated Crop. Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Sweden University of Agricultural Science: Umea, Sweden. Report 11, pp 358–374.Sorensen FC, Miles RS (1974). Self-pollination effects on Douglas fir and ponderosa pine seeds and seedlings. Silvae Genet 23: 135–138.Sorensen FC, Miles RS (1982). Inbreeding depression in height, height growth, and survival of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, and noble fir to 10 years of age. For Sci 28: 283–292.Terrab A, Paun O, Talavera S, Tremetsberger K, Arista M, Stuessy TF (2006). Genetic diversity and population structure in natural populations of Moroccan Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica; Pinaceae) determined with cpSSR markers. Am J Bot 93: 1274–1280.Vendramin GG, Lelli L, Rossi P, Morgante M (1996). A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Mol Ecol 5: 595–598.White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007). Forest Genetics. CABI Publisher: Cambridge, MA. pp 149–186.Wilcox MD (1983). Inbreeding depression and genetic variances estimated from self- and cross- pollinated families of Pinus radiata. Silvae Genet 32: 89–96.Williams CG (2007). Re-thinking the embryo lethal system within the Pinaceae. Can J Bot 85: 667–677.Williams CG (2008). Selfed embryo death in Pinus taeda: a phenotypic profile. New Phytol 178: 210–222.Williams CG, Auckland LD, Reynolds MM, Leach KA (2003). Overdominant lethals as part of the conifer embryo lethal system. Heredity 91: 584–592.Wilson R (1923). Life history of Cedrus atlantica. Bot Gaz 75: 203–208.Yazdani R, Muona O, Rudin D, Szmidt AE (1985). Genetic structure of a Pinus sylvestris L. seed-tree stand and naturally regenerated understory. For Sci 31: 430–436

The evolutionary significance of polyploidy

Polyploidy, or the duplication of entire genomes, has been observed in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, and in somatic and germ cells. The consequences of polyploidization are complex and variable, and they differ greatly between systems (clonal or non-clonal) and species, but the process has often been considered to be an evolutionary 'dead end'. Here, we review the accumulating evidence that correlates polyploidization with environmental change or stress, and that has led to an increased recognition of its short-term adaptive potential. In addition, we discuss how, once polyploidy has been established, the unique retention profile of duplicated genes following whole-genome duplication might explain key longer-term evolutionary transitions and a general increase in biological complexity