The “minimal boundary curve for endothermy” as a predictor of heterothermy in mammals and birds: a review

According to the concept of the “minimal boundary curve for endothermy”, mammals and birds with a basal metabolic rate (BMR) that falls below the curve are obligate heterotherms and must enter torpor. We examined the reliability of the boundary curve (on a double log plot transformed to a line) for predicting torpor as a function of body mass and BMR for birds and several groups of mammals. The boundary line correctly predicted heterothermy in 87.5% of marsupials (n = 64), 94% of bats (n = 85) and 82.3% of rodents (n = 157). Our analysis shows that the boundary line is not a reliable predictor for use of torpor. A discriminate analysis using body mass and BMR had a similar predictive power as the boundary line. However, there are sufficient exceptions to both methods of analysis to suggest that the relationship between body mass, BMR and heterothermy is not a causal one. Some homeothermic birds (e.g. silvereyes) and rodents (e.g. hopping mice) fall below the boundary line, and there are many examples of heterothermic species that fall above the boundary line. For marsupials and bats, but not for rodents, there was a highly significant phylogenetic pattern for heterothermy, suggesting that taxonomic affiliation is the biggest determinant of heterothermy for these mammalian groups. For rodents, heterothermic species had lower BMRs than homeothermic species. Low BMR and use of torpor both contribute to reducing energy expenditure and both physiological traits appear to be a response to the same selective pressure of fluctuating food supply, increasing fitness in endothermic species that are constrained by limited energy availability. Both the minimal boundary line and discriminate analysis were of little value for predicting the use of daily torpor or hibernation in heterotherms, presumably as both daily torpor and hibernation are precisely controlled processes, not an inability to thermoregulate

Influence of the cranial base flexion on Class I, II and III malocclusions: a systematic review

ABSTRACTObjective:The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the morphological characteristics of the skull base (flexion, anterior length and posterior length) and the concomitant development of malocclusions, by comparing differences in dimorphism, ethnicity and age.Methods: The articles were selected by means of electronic search on BBO, MEDLINE and LILACS databases from 1966 to 2016. A qualitative evaluation of the methodologies used on the articles was also performed.Results: Although the literature on this topic is abundant, only 16 articles were selected for the present systematic review. The cranial base angle itself does not seem to play a significant role in the development of malocclusions. In fact, the cranial base angle is relatively stable at the ages of 5 to 15 years.Conclusions: A more obtuse angle at the skull base, in association or not with a greater anterior length of the cranial base, can contribute to the development of Class II division 1 malocclusions. On the other hand, a more acute angle at the skull base can contribute to a more anterior positioning of the mandible and to the development of Class III malocclusions.RESUMOObjetivo:o objetivo desse estudo foi realizar uma revisão sistemática sobre as características morfológicas da base do crânio (flexão, comprimento anterior e comprimento posterior) e o desenvolvimento concomitante da má oclusão, comparando as diferenças do dimorfismo, etnia e idade.Métodos: os artigos foram selecionados por meio de busca eletrônica nas bases de dados BBO, MEDLINE e LILACS, de 1966 a 2016. Uma avaliação qualitativa da metodologia dos artigos também foi executada.Resultados: ainda que a literatura seja abundante nesse assunto, somente 16 artigos foram selecionados para a presente revisão sistemática. O ângulo da base do crânio, por si só, não parece desempenhar papel significativo no desenvolvimento das más oclusões. De fato, o ângulo da base do crânio é relativamente estável dos 5 aos 15 anos.Conclusões: um ângulo mais obtuso na base do crânio, associado ou não a um comprimento maior, pode contribuir para o desenvolvimento da má oclusão de Classe II, divisão 1. Por outro lado, um ângulo mais agudo na base do crânio pode contribuir para um posicionamento mais anterior da mandíbula e para o desenvolvimento da má oclusão de Classe III