329 research outputs found
FilozĂłfia Ă©s Ă©let. A harmadik felvilĂĄgosodĂĄs
Egy harmadik âfelvilĂĄgosodĂĄsrĂłlâ szeretnĂ©k beszĂ©lni, amely mĂ©g nem törtĂ©nt meg, vagy legalĂĄbb is mĂ©g nem törtĂ©nt meg teljesen, de amely remĂ©lem, megtörtĂ©nek majd, Ă©s amiĂ©rt Ă©rdemes kĂŒzdeni. InkĂĄbb, mint bĂĄrmely mĂĄs gondolkodĂł az elmĂșlt szĂĄzadban, Ășgy vĂ©lem, hogy e felvilĂĄgosodĂĄsnak (pragmatikus felvilĂĄgosodĂĄsnak fogom ezt nevezni) John Dewey a legjobb filozĂłfusa
Localism vs. Individualism for the Scientific Realism Debate
Localism is the view that the unit of evaluation in the scientific realism debate is a single scientific discipline, sub-discipline, or claim, whereas individualism is the view that the unit of evaluation is a single scientific theory. Localism is compatible, while individualism is not, with a local pessimistic induction and a local selective induction. Asay (2016) presents several arguments to support localism and undercut globalism, according to which the unit of evaluation is the set of all scientific disciplines. I argue that some of his arguments clash with localism as well as with globalism and support individualism, and that individualism goes hand in hand, while localism does not, with the basic rule of how to evaluate an argument
Trial and error predicates and the solution of a problem of Mostowski
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Symbolic Logic is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Symbolic Logic
FilozĂłfia Ă©s Ă©let : a harmadik felvilĂĄgosodĂĄs
Egy harmadik âfelvilĂĄgosodĂĄsrĂłlâ szeretnĂ©k beszĂ©lni, amely mĂ©g nem törtĂ©nt meg, vagy legalĂĄbb is mĂ©g nem törtĂ©nt meg teljesen, de amely remĂ©lem, megtörtĂ©nek majd, Ă©s amiĂ©rt Ă©rdemes kĂŒzdeni. InkĂĄbb, mint bĂĄrmely mĂĄs gondolkodĂł az elmĂșlt szĂĄzadban, Ășgy vĂ©lem, hogy e felvilĂĄgosodĂĄsnak (pragmatikus felvilĂĄgosodĂĄsnak fogom ezt nevezni) John Dewey a legjobb filozĂłfusa
FilozĂłfia Ă©s Ă©let : a harmadik felvilĂĄgosodĂĄs
Egy harmadik âfelvilĂĄgosodĂĄsrĂłlâ szeretnĂ©k beszĂ©lni, amely mĂ©g nem törtĂ©nt meg, vagy legalĂĄbb is mĂ©g nem törtĂ©nt meg teljesen, de amely remĂ©lem, megtörtĂ©nek majd, Ă©s amiĂ©rt Ă©rdemes kĂŒzdeni. InkĂĄbb, mint bĂĄrmely mĂĄs gondolkodĂł az elmĂșlt szĂĄzadban, Ășgy vĂ©lem, hogy e felvilĂĄgosodĂĄsnak (pragmatikus felvilĂĄgosodĂĄsnak fogom ezt nevezni) John Dewey a legjobb filozĂłfusa
- âŠ