11 research outputs found

    Asymptotically optimal orthonormal basis functions for LPV system Identification

    Get PDF
    A global model structure is developed for parametrization and identification of a general class of Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) systems. By using a fixed orthonormal basis function (OBF) structure, a linearly parametrized model structure follows for which the coefficients are dependent on a scheduling signal. An optimal set of OBFs for this model structure is selected on the basis of local linear dynamic properties of the LPV system (system poles) that occur for different constant scheduling signals. The selected OBF set guarantees in an asymptotic sense the least worst-case modeling error for any local model of the LPV system. Through the fusion of the Kolmogorov n-width theory and Fuzzy c-Means clustering, an approach is developed to solve the OBF-selection problem for discrete-time LPV systems, based on the clustering of observed sample system poles

    Flexible model structures for LPV identification with static scheduling dependency

    No full text
    A discrete-time linear parameter-varying (LPV) model can be seen as the combination of local LTI models together with a scheduling signal dependent function set, that selects one of the models to describe the continuation of the signal trajectories at every time instant. An identification strategy of LPV models is proposed that consists of the separate approximation of the local model set and the scheduling functions. The local model set is represented as a linear combination (series expansion) of orthonormal basis functions (OBFs). The expansion coefficients are dynamically dependent (weighting) functions of the scheduling parameters (depending on time shifted scheduling). To approximate this dependency class with a static one (non-shifted scheduling), a feedback-based structure of the weighting functions is introduced. The proposed model structure is identified in a two step procedure. First the OBFs, that guarantee the least asymptotic worst-case modeling error for the local models, are selected through the fuzzy Kolmogorov c-Max approach. With the resulting OBFs, the weighting functions are identified through a separable least-squares algorithm. The method is demonstrated by means of simulation examples and analyzed in terms of applicability, convergence, and consistency of the model estimates

    Prediction-error identification of LPV systems : present and beyond

    No full text
    The proposed chapter aims at presenting a unified framework of prediction-error based identification of LPV systems using freshly developed theoretical results. Recently, these methods have got a considerable attention as they have certain advantages in terms of computational complexity, optimality in the stochastic sense and available theoretical tools to analyze estimation errors like bias, variance, etc., and the understanding of consistency and convergence. Beside the introduction of the theoretical tools and the prediction-error framework itself,the scope of the chapter includes a detailed investigation of the LPV extension of the classical model structures like ARX, ARMAX, Box鈥揓enkins, OE, FIR, and series expansion models, like orthonormal basis functions based structures, together with their available estimation approaches including linear regression, nonlinear optimization, and iterative IV methods. Questions of model structure selection and experimental design are also investigated. In this way, the chapter provides a detailed overview about the state-of-the-art of LPV prediction-error identification giving the reader an easy guide to find the right tools of his LPV identification problems

    An LPV identification framework based on orthonormal basis functions

    Get PDF
    Describing nonlinear dynamic systems by Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) models has become an attractive tool for control of complicated systems with regime-dependent (linear) behavior. For the identification of LPV models from experimental data a number of methods has been presented in the literature but a full picture of the underlying identification problem is still missing. In this contribution a solid system theoretic basis for the description of model structures for LPV systems is presented, together with a general approach to the LPV identification problem. Use is made of a series-expansion approach, employing orthogonal basis functions

    LPV system identification using series expansion models

    Get PDF
    This review volume reports the state-of-the-art in Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) system identification. Written by world renowned researchers, the book contains twelve chapters, focusing on the most recent LPV identification methods for both discrete-time and continuous-time models, using different approaches such as optimization methods for input/output LPV models Identification, set membership methods, optimization methods and subspace methods for state-space LPV models identification and orthonormal basis functions methods. Since there is a strong connection between LPV systems, hybrid switching systems and piecewise affine models, identification of hybrid switching systems and piecewise affine systems will be considered as well

    Identification of dynamic models in complex networks with prediction error methods : basic methods for consistent module estimates

    Get PDF
    The problem of identifying dynamical models on the basis of measurement data is usually considered in a classical open-loop or closed-loop setting. In this paper, this problem is generalized to dynamical systems that operate in a complex interconnection structure and the objective is to consistently identify the dynamics of a particular module in the network. For a known interconnection structure it is shown that the classical prediction error methods for closed-loop identification can be generalized to provide consistent model estimates, under specified experimental circumstances. Two classes of methods considered in this paper are the direct method and the joint-IO method that rely on consistent noise models, and indirect methods that rely on external excitation signals like two-stage and IV methods. Graph theoretical tools are presented to verify the topological conditions under which the several methods lead to consistent module estimates. Keywords: System identification; Closed-loop identification; Graph theory; Dynamic networks; Identifiability; Linear system

    Predictor input selection for two stage identification in dynamic networks

    No full text
    \u3cp\u3eRecently, the Two-Stage method has been proposed as a tool to obtain consistent estimates of modules embedded in dynamic networks [1], [2]. However, for this method the variables that are included in the predictor model are currently not considered as a user choice. In this paper it is shown that there is considerable freedom as to which variables can be included in the predictor model as inputs, and still obtain consistent estimates of the module of interest. Conditions that the choice of predictor inputs must satisfy are presented. The conditions could be used to find the smallest number of predictor inputs for instance. Algorithms are presented for checking the conditions and obtaining the estimates.\u3c/p\u3

    Errors-in-variables identification in dynamic networks - consistency results for an instrumental variable approach

    No full text
    In this paper we consider the identification of a linear module that is embedded in a dynamic network using noisy measurements of the internal variables of the network. This is an extension of the errors-in-variables (EIV) identification framework to the case of dynamic networks. The consequence of measuring the variables with sensor noise is that some prediction error identification methods no longer result in consistent estimates. The method developed in this paper is based on a combination of the instrumental variable philosophy and closed-loop prediction error identification methods, and leads to consistent estimates of modules in a dynamic network. We consider a flexible choice of which internal variables need to be measured in order to identify the module of interest. This allows for a flexible sensor placement scheme. We also present a method that can be used to validate the identified model

    Orthonormal basis functions in time and frequency domain:Hambo transform theory

    No full text
    \u3cp\u3eThe class of finite impulse response (FIR), Laguerre, and Kautz functions can be generalized to a family of rational orthonormal basis functions for the Hardy space H \u3csub\u3e2\u3c/sub\u3e of stable linear dynamical systems. These basis functions are useful for constructing efficient parameterizations and coding of linear systems and signals, as required in, e.g., system identification, system approximation, and adaptive filtering. In this paper, the basis functions are derived from a transfer function perspective as well as in a state space setting. It is shown how this approach leads to alternative series expansions of systems and signals in time and frequency domain. The generalized basis functions induce signal and system transforms (Hambo transforms), which have proved to be useful analysis tools in various modelling problems. These transforms are analyzed in detail in this paper, and a large number of their properties are derived. Principally, it is shown how minimal state space realizations of the system transform can be obtained from minimal state space realizations of the original system and vice versa.\u3c/p\u3

    Discrete time LPV I/O and state-space representations, differences of behavior and pitfalls of interpolation

    Get PDF
    A common approach for modeling LPV systems is to interpolate between local LTI models, often obtained by system identification methods. We study the results of interpolating in different domains, the so called I/O domain and the state-space domain. It is shown that significant differences can occur between the interpolated models, due to differences in time propagation of the (scheduling) parameter. We introduce canonical representations for LPV state-space realizations similar to the LTV framework and derive exact formulas for the connection between I/O and state-space based LPV models
    corecore